Two unmarked interpretations in the problem statement, both caught in
post-release verification:
- "but rising" is supported by the source, but it rests on a different
subset (feedback conversations, late 2024 to late 2025) than the
one-week December 2025 sample, and the paper explicitly says it
"can't pinpoint why" — the increase could reflect shifts in the user
base or in who leaves feedback. Rewritten to carry that caveat.
- "the mechanism is the interaction structure, not individual
vulnerability" was an inference from the abstract, not a statement in
it. Replaced with what it actually supports: the vulnerability does
not depend on the user being irrational.
README prose only; SKILL.md is untouched, so this is not a behaviour
change and the plugin stays at v1.2.2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011rtdS8Ufpen419n6R9HyMm
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
4328337688