BRIEF-vurdering-v2.md tiltak 2: "design for the investigator, not the
validator". The hook alerts stated short conclusions a reader can only
accept or dismiss ("Rapid-fire: N consecutive fast interactions",
"possible stuck/spiral", "Consider a break").
Each alert in tool-tracker.mjs now follows the form the read-dominant
edit-ratio message introduced in 2c9e2de — observation, the counter-signal
that changes how to read it, then what to check:
- burst: names the interval and that edits were among the calls, and asks
whether each change was verified before the next
- edit ratio: carries the read percentage and asks what the remaining
calls are doing and whether the approach is converging
- soft warning: closes on framing instead of prescribing a break
- hard warning: asks the model to name its observations and ask what they
reflect; the required stop action is unchanged
commands/interaction-report.md gains the same rule for Observations and
trend reporting, plus an explicit "investigator, not validator" tone rule
and a "report the difference, not a label for it" rule.
Wording only — thresholds, heuristics, data model and required actions
are untouched. README examples and threshold-basis cells updated to match.
Tests first (Iron Law): 6 new/updated assertions on message text in
tests/tool-tracker.test.mjs and tests/interaction-report.test.mjs, red
before the change. node --test tests/*.test.mjs: 269 pass, 5 fail — the
pre-existing perf wall-clock cases only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013U8ZH25KiMtts89yWRuVWD
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
86c3eae30c