fix: pedagogical review - add expected output, CLAUDE.md, fix consistency

Address findings from pedagogical review simulating a non-expert user:

- Add CLAUDE.md to project root (was referenced but missing)
- Fix README score from 12/9/1 to 13/8/1 (match feature-map.md)
- Add Expected Output sections to examples 01, 02, 05, 09, 10
- Create pipeline-output/ and briefings/ directories
- Add example ordering guidance in README
- Add plan requirements for examples 11/13 in prerequisites
- Add skill frontmatter explanation in GETTING-STARTED.md
- Explain Cowork/Dispatch with links in cowork-integration
- Expand .gitignore with node_modules and generated output files
- Add model override hints in agent frontmatter comments

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/01-agent-runtime/prompt.md

@@ -39,6 +39,35 @@ confirmation between steps unless it hits something ambiguous.
 
 ---
 
+## Expected Output
+
+After 30-60 seconds, you should see a new file `research-output.md` in the
+project root. It will look something like this (content varies by month):
+
+```markdown
+# AI Frameworks Released This Month
+
+## 1. ExampleFramework
+- **Released:** March 12, 2026
+- **GitHub:** https://github.com/example/framework (4,200 stars)
+- **What it solves:** Simplifies multi-agent orchestration for Python developers.
+- **Verdict:** Worth watching. Growing fast with strong community momentum.
+
+## 2. ...
+
+## Verdict
+1. ExampleFramework - most practical for production use
+2. ...
+```
+
+**How you know it worked:**
+- A file called `research-output.md` exists in the project root
+- It contains 3 frameworks with star counts and URLs
+- It ends with a ranked Verdict section
+- You saw WebSearch and WebFetch tool calls streaming in the terminal
+
+---
+
 ## Why This Matters
 
 This is the agent loop in action: plan, execute, observe, repeat. The same