fix(scanners): retire the autoMode GAP dimension, a /doctor duplicate (D1)
CC 2.1.226's /doctor Check 8 covers auto mode with usage-weighted judgement. The binding positioning forbids carrying a feature whose whole value is duplicating a /doctor check, so the "adopt this feature" nudge goes. The deterministic side stays: SET still validates autoMode structure and still flags it as dead config in shared project settings. GAP dimensions 25 -> 24. The title lived in FOUR tables, not the two the removal was scoped against: the dimension list, scoring TITLE_TO_ID, the humanizer's static translations, and the scoring denominators (TIER_COUNTS t3 8->7, TOTAL_DIMENSIONS 25->24, MAX_WEIGHTED 42->41) -- the one that moves a user-visible number. findGapId falls back to 'unknown' silently, so a partial removal would have degraded without failing. A blanket sync invariant now asserts all four against GAP_CHECKS instead of comparing occurrences pairwise; each arm was verified red against its own defect (denominator drift, orphaned humanizer entry, resurrected dimension). Frozen tests/snapshots/v5.0.0/ stays untouched. strip-retired-gap.mjs is the removal twin of strip-added-scanner.mjs: it strips the retired dimension from whichever side still carries it and re-derives GAP IDs, since retiring a dimension from mid-list shifts every later ID by one. Derived utilization figures are dropped from comparison rather than recomputed -- recomputing them in a test helper would assert the new arithmetic against itself, and scoring.test.mjs already pins them exactly. Re-seeding was rejected: it would silently bake in any other drift across every scanner those four files cover. risk_score, risk_band, verdict, overallGrade, maturity and segment are byte-identical across the change (severity info carries zero risk weight; GAP is excluded from the overall grade). Utilization shifts 43 -> 44 on the fixture. D2 (CA-SKL-002) is NOT removed. Verified against the primary source first: the CC changelog carries exactly one budget-fraction statement (L3786, 2.1.32) and nothing supersedes it, so our 2% is current and 002 is not a duplicate with a stale figure. /doctor's ~1% could not be reconciled from the changelog and it discloses its own numbers as disk estimates, so it is recorded, not adopted. Left explicitly unverified in a code note: L3786 says "character budget" while we express tokens -- a 4x difference nobody can settle from the wording. Suite 1531 -> 1535, all green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RsfPGxgwbR3MY54wDC6hat
This commit is contained in:
parent
182a37c1af
commit
4027cdcf54
17 changed files with 368 additions and 75 deletions
|
|
@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ export const DESCRIPTION_CAP = 1536;
|
|||
// The 200k/1M window constants live in context-window.mjs (single source of
|
||||
// truth, shared with the CML CLAUDE.md char-budget check); re-exported here so
|
||||
// existing importers of this module keep working.
|
||||
// D2 re-verification (2026-08-09, CC 2.1.226). CC 2.1.226's /doctor reports a
|
||||
// combined skill+command+agent listing and puts the budget near ~1% (~10,000
|
||||
// tok on a 1M window) — half of ours. Checked against the primary source
|
||||
// before touching the number: the CC changelog contains EXACTLY ONE
|
||||
// budget-fraction statement (L3786, under 2.1.32) and no later entry
|
||||
// supersedes it, so 2% stands and CA-SKL-002 is NOT a /doctor duplicate
|
||||
// carrying a stale figure. /doctor's arithmetic could not be reconciled from
|
||||
// the changelog, and /doctor discloses its own numbers as disk estimates
|
||||
// (chars÷4), so its ~1% is recorded, not adopted.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// NOT VERIFIED, deliberately left alone: L3786 says "skill CHARACTER budget
|
||||
// now scales with context window (2% of context)". We express the budget in
|
||||
// TOKENS (0.02 × 200k = 4000 tok). Whether CC's budget is 2% counted in
|
||||
// characters or in tokens is not resolvable from the changelog wording, and no
|
||||
// primary source settles it — a 4× difference rides on the answer. Changing
|
||||
// the constant on that ambiguity would be a guess; it stays until a primary
|
||||
// source decides it.
|
||||
export const BUDGET_FRACTION = 0.02;
|
||||
export const AGGREGATE_BUDGET_TOKENS = Math.round(BUDGET_FRACTION * CONTEXT_WINDOW_ANCHOR); // 4000
|
||||
export const LARGE_CONTEXT_BUDGET_TOKENS = Math.round(BUDGET_FRACTION * LARGE_CONTEXT_WINDOW); // 20000
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue