feat(scanners): the write gate now runs in code, not in the templates' prose
`write-scope.mjs` has existed since M-BUG-41, but only one writer ever called it. Measured 2026-08-12: 9 files under `scanners/` write to disk, 1 imported the gate; 21 command templates, 17 mention a write, 5 call `write-scope-cli`. Five templates paraphrasing one policy is the shape that put the lever table in five copies (#61) — one level up. The defect was never "8 ungated writers = 8 bugs". Four of them write the plugin's own bookkeeping and must STAY ungated: a gate that fires on every run gets switched off, and then it guards nothing. The defect is that nothing declared WHICH, so the question was answered by reading, and answered differently each time it was asked. `tests/lib/write-gate-coverage.test.mjs` makes the answer structural: every writer either imports the gate or holds an EXEMPT entry naming where the bytes land. Seen RED against today's tree before the fix (4 ungated writers), and each of its four assertions was separately seen red against its own defect. Two premises in the plan text were falsified by measuring them first: - `scan-orchestrator` was carried as "plugin-managed, legitimately exempt". `--save-baseline` derives its path from the SCAN TARGET, so `--global` lands `~/.claude/.config-audit-baseline.json` — user-scope, require-ok. It is gated. `lib/baseline.mjs` is the genuinely exempt one. - the first sweep scored 9 writers with a regex that could not match `writeFileSync(`, so `lib/backup.mjs` — a real writer — read as clean. The guard covers sync and async forms, strips comments before matching, and asserts non-emptiness so a regex that stops matching cannot make every other assertion vacuously green (#63, #64). Gated: fix-engine, rollback-engine, campaign-export-cli, scan-orchestrator. All five call sites share ONE reduction, `evaluateWriteTargets` — four copies of classify/strongestGate/dedup is the drift this exists to prevent. `campaign export` still DISCLOSES rather than refuses: cross-repo is by design there, and tightening it into a refusal would break the feature. A dry run is still not a write, so it is never gated (#63). A refusal is a verdict about a config that WAS examined, so it rides in the payload and keeps the 0/1/2 exit contract (#62) — and the verdict now reaches the success payload too, since stderr is discarded by `2>/dev/null` (F3's class). commands/fix.md carries `--approve-scope` from the answer the user gives, with the rule stated where it can be read: classifying is not approving. Dogfooded end to end: a target outside the session root refuses with zero bytes written, then applies under `--approve-scope`. Suite 1703 -> 1707/0. Frozen v5.0.0 + default-output snapshots: 0 changed files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Pkn22uGCgk6QZA738zNmHL
This commit is contained in:
parent
e60b80978b
commit
749b710de7
16 changed files with 520 additions and 34 deletions
|
|
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ describe('restoreBackup', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('restores files to original content', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId);
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId, { repoRoot: tmpDir });
|
||||
assert.ok(result.restored.length > 0, 'Should restore at least one file');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(result.failed.length, 0, 'No failures');
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,14 +85,14 @@ describe('restoreBackup', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('verifies checksums after restore', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId, { verify: true });
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId, { verify: true, repoRoot: tmpDir });
|
||||
for (const r of result.restored) {
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(r.status, 'restored');
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('dry-run returns plan without writing', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId, { dryRun: true });
|
||||
const result = await restoreBackup(backup.backupId, { dryRun: true, repoRoot: tmpDir });
|
||||
assert.ok(result.restored.length > 0);
|
||||
for (const r of result.restored) {
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(r.status, 'dry-run');
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue