feat(knowledge): model + effort routing enter the register, dated [skip-docs]
C1: two entries the optimization lens can cite for the model/effort axis, both read out of the primary sources in this session rather than from the plan's 2026-07-14 summary of them. Verifying corrected the plan's own numbers: effort is settable in SIX places, not five (/effort, the /model slider, --effort, CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, settings effortLevel, skill/subagent frontmatter), the default is high on every supporting model EXCEPT Opus 4.7 (xhigh), and the level count is model-dependent (Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 have no xhigh). - BP-MODEL-001: subagent `model` defaults to `inherit`, so a subagent that names no model costs what the session costs; the documented pin is overridable by CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL and per-invocation model - BP-MODEL-002: effort is an axis separate from model choice, and higher is not universally better (`max` "may show diminishing returns and is prone to overthinking") - both carry the 2026-07-07 model/effort blog as a corroborating source with a real `published` date, so B1's evidence-age rule has teeth: measured stale with reasons ['evidence-age'] at a reference date 378 days past publication while their verified stamps are pristine. The docs pages themselves get NO published date — they carry none, and guessing one in the field whose whole job is dating evidence is the lie the rule exists to catch - new blanket guard: every corroborating source must carry a parseable published date. Without it newestEvidenceMs() returns null and the entry stays green on evidence of any age — a silent hole. Seen red against its own defect before it was trusted - knowledge-refresh-cli's stale branch no longer expires on every new entry: its reference date has to sit after every `verified` stamp, was bumped once for BP-SUB-001 and would have needed a third bump now, so it moves to a date no stamp can reach Register 14 -> 16 entries. Frozen v5.0.0 snapshots untouched (no scanner output changes); suite 1579/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NKjojcdYYiCQP5AudUyQ5e
This commit is contained in:
parent
542f983178
commit
e861e63a7b
3 changed files with 103 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -9,19 +9,24 @@ import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
|
|||
const __dirname = fileURLToPath(new URL('.', import.meta.url));
|
||||
const CLI = resolve(__dirname, '../../scanners/knowledge-refresh-cli.mjs');
|
||||
|
||||
// The reference date must sit AFTER the newest entry's `verified` date, so every
|
||||
// entry is at least one day old and both the fresh and stale branches are
|
||||
// reachable deterministically, regardless of the real clock.
|
||||
// A fixed reference date keeps both branches reachable regardless of the real clock.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// It used to be 2026-06-21, on the premise that every seed entry was verified
|
||||
// 2026-06-20. That premise expired when BP-SUB-001 was added with a genuine
|
||||
// 2026-07-31 verification date — an entry verified *after* the reference date has
|
||||
// a negative age and counts as fresh, so `--stale-after 0` no longer emptied the
|
||||
// fresh bucket. Backdating the entry to fit the test would have been a lie about
|
||||
// when its source was checked; moving the reference date is the honest fix.
|
||||
// Bump this again when a newer entry lands.
|
||||
// REF is used by the fresh branch only, and needs no maintenance: an entry verified
|
||||
// after it has a negative age and still counts as fresh.
|
||||
const REF = '2026-08-01';
|
||||
|
||||
// The stale branch needs a date strictly after EVERY entry's `verified` stamp — with
|
||||
// `--stale-after 0` an entry verified later than the reference date has a negative age,
|
||||
// lands in the fresh bucket, and empties nothing.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This was REF itself, bumped 2026-06-21 → 2026-08-01 when BP-SUB-001 landed with a
|
||||
// genuine 2026-07-31 stamp, and it expired a second time when BP-MODEL-001/002 landed
|
||||
// verified 2026-08-10. Backdating an entry to fit the test would lie about when its
|
||||
// source was read, and re-deriving the date from the register would just assert the
|
||||
// register against itself. A date no verification stamp can reach satisfies the
|
||||
// requirement by construction, so no future entry expires it.
|
||||
const REF_AFTER_EVERY_STAMP = '2999-01-01';
|
||||
|
||||
function runCli(extraArgs) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const stdout = execFileSync('node', [CLI, ...extraArgs], { encoding: 'utf-8', timeout: 15000 });
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +46,10 @@ describe('knowledge-refresh-cli — exit codes', () => {
|
|||
|
||||
it('exits 1 (advisory) when one or more entries are stale', () => {
|
||||
// stale-after 0 → anything verified before the reference date is stale.
|
||||
const { status, stdout } = runCli(['--reference-date', REF, '--stale-after', '0']);
|
||||
const { status, stdout } = runCli([
|
||||
'--reference-date', REF_AFTER_EVERY_STAMP,
|
||||
'--stale-after', '0',
|
||||
]);
|
||||
assert.equal(status, 1);
|
||||
const out = JSON.parse(stdout);
|
||||
assert.ok(out.counts.stale > 0);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue