Article rule 1 ("give Claude judgement instead of rules") gets its register
entry, and deliberately no detector. `BP-JUDG-001` carries `lensCheck: null`.
The cut between deterministic prefilter and prose judge was the open design
decision. It was settled by measurement, and the measurement declined both
halves:
- 409 real CLAUDE.md files (38488 lines, 8689 prose blocks): the caging class
fires 7 times, and all 7 are false positives ("rendered prose-side",
"naming is a flag on the class"). Verified along an independent grep path
that bypasses block-splitting and sentence-splitting entirely, in both word
orders: 5 lines and 1 line, none an instruction.
- The narrow variant (absolute + form noun + numeric cap) fired 8 times —
one duplicated block seen seven times across plugin caches, precision 0 %.
The pre-committed rule required 90 % over 20 distinct fires.
- Where the shape does occur — 45 lines across 4755 skill/agent/command files
— it is the author's editorial policy (emoji, sentence length, slide
titles). Nothing in the text separates that from a vendor's over-tight
guardrail, and the article's reasoning does not transfer: the model is not
the author of a user's config.
So no CA-OPT-002; finding-codes keeps OPT next-free = 2. The numbers live in
the entry's own `note`, so the next session does not re-derive the question.
Two premises the chunk falsified. The brief justified a separate axis by
saying these blocks sit inside `floor-exclusion`'s floor — but the article's
own canonical line carries no floor marker at all, so "inside the floor"
cannot define the axis (the corpus tendency is 76 %, which is a tendency, not
a mechanism). And the fasit's own form-noun vocabulary was wrong: `name` and
`format` alone drove 97 % of fires.
Not folded into `--subtract`: a third "loosen instead of delete" verdict in
the subtraction judge is the AS#5 mixing STATE forbids, and with the corrected
vocabulary there are 0 collisions to arbitrate anyway.
Guards, both seen red against their own defect first: the entry must exist,
be confirmed, date its source and name NO lensCheck; and every lensCheck in
the register must be backed by a real detector.
No behaviour changed — no new finding, no output change, nothing consumes the
entry yet — hence `docs`, not `feat`. Suite 1701 -> 1703/0; frozen v5.0.0 and
default-output baselines 0 changed files. Fasit:
docs/b2-judgment-lens-fasit.local.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017mCkx9wGywqNQzsXkBMzJ1
Operator decision 2026-08-10 (session #61): the subtraction axis' write half is
wanted in use, so it moves ahead of C3/B2/B3. M-BUG-41 (scope-gate) is promoted
with it as the prerequisite — subtraction-write targets ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md,
which is by definition outside the repo the session stands in, and that is
exactly the gate M-BUG-41 is missing on its two measured arms.
Adds §C6 recording the frames the chunk inherits rather than invents: the
deterministic floor runs before the judge, ~/.claude is archived by mv and never
rm, user level is mandatory in v1, and the honest sizing is ~20% of the file —
not the 80% the framing invites. The apply mechanism is deliberately left open,
to be settled in the chunk's fasit against the gate rather than before it.
Also corrects the release level in the list: MAJOR (v6.0.0), since M-BUG-28
shipped with a BREAKING CHANGE footer that outranks the minor the additions
alone would have implied.
Records the rejection of a sibling /repo-reinit skill so it is not revived: it
would be a third implementation of one judgement alongside this axis and
/doctor Check 3, and regenerating a CLAUDE.md destroys the floor that makes a
mature one valuable. repo-init already owns the fresh-repo case.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Pq3nye21RVYk4pZLeT8pGz
Oppgave A measured (fasit-first, CC 2.1.220): /doctor overlaps our
judgment lenses and alarms, not the deterministic validators. Binding
outcome: 0 whole scanners removed, 2 measured function-duplicates
scheduled for removal (GAP autoMode dimension, CA-SKL-002 alarm role),
5 surfaces repositioned. Plan rewritten with D-chunks + B2-B4 merged
against the existing C-chunks and open dogfood posts; old rejection #5
(prose contradiction detection) superseded by B3 with evidence.
README gains the division-of-labor section vs /doctor; CLAUDE.md gains
the never-duplicate-a-doctor-check invariant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019NeaMRXVGzh9oSwigJDjE9
Batch release of everything since v5.12.5: one new lens mode and 14 real bugs,
all of them dogfooding finds — either from running the plugin against the
maintainer's real machine, or from walking analyze -> plan -> implement ->
rollback end-to-end on a throwaway repo copy.
Minor, not patch. STATE recorded this batch as "fix: only"; the log says
otherwise — e9921d3 ships `optimize --subtract`, a user-facing opt-in flag, so
semver requires a minor. Verified by reading `git log v5.12.5..HEAD` rather than
trusting the note: 11 fix, 1 feat, 8 docs.
Consequence: the planned v5.13 work (model routing, effort awareness, dead
references) now targets v5.14. docs/v5.13-model-routing-effort-deadref-plan.md
keeps its filename so existing references resolve, and says so at the top —
leaving a doc named for a version that shipped something else is exactly the
dead-reference class that plan is about.
Gates, all re-run against ground truth before writing anything:
- node --test 'tests/**/*.test.mjs' -> 1398 pass / 0 fail
- scanners/self-audit.mjs --check-readme -> passed (tests badge 1344 -> 1398;
the path in STATE said scripts/, which does not exist)
- catalog check-versions.mjs -> 0 ERROR
Counts unchanged: scanners 16, agents 7, commands 21, hooks 4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AA5LT1UaDzctNkMi414qzA
Video-derived audit ('The Model Isn't the Moat') cross-checked against
primary sources. Verified: orchestrator+cheap-worker pattern and 5-level
per-agent effort tuning (official docs); rejected: the 'Fable low ≈ Opus
high' chart claim (contradicted by Anthropic's own pages). Five chunks:
register entries BP-MODEL-001/002, fix-engine xhigh hygiene, CA-CML dead
prose references, feature-gap model/effort opportunity, planner-agent
adversarial gate. Sequenced AFTER DEL B pipeline dogfood + batch release.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CTontYwY5JGS4nL2AuiASy
