Wave 5 Step 13. Threads the humanizer vocabulary through five audit/
analysis command templates and adds a shape test that locks the
structure in place.
- commands/posture.md, tokens.md, feature-gap.md (findings-renderers):
reference userImpactCategory/userActionLanguage/relevanceContext;
remove hardcoded A/B/C/D/F-to-prose tables (humanizer owns the
grade-context vocabulary now via the stderr scorecard headline).
- commands/manifest.md, whats-active.md (inventory CLIs): add --raw
pass-through for CLI-surface consistency. --raw is a no-op in these
CLIs, but the flag is threaded through so users get uniform behaviour.
- All five files: --raw flag parsed from $ARGUMENTS and passed verbatim
to the underlying scanner CLI when present.
tests/commands/group-a-shape.test.mjs (new, +5 tests, 767 → 772):
- structural: every file has a bash invocation block, Read tool
reference, and --raw/$ARGUMENTS plumbing
- findings-renderers only: at least one humanized field referenced;
no hardcoded "[grade] grade is..." prose tables
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.
New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.
Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.
Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
