Commands are namespaced (/name:command), so a command name shared by two
differently-named plugins keeps both reachable — it is ambiguity, not a hard
conflict. The check now mirrors COL's plugin-vs-plugin skill finding: severity
LOW (was HIGH), category plugin-hygiene, COL-shaped details.namespaces, and a
group-first shape (one finding per command name listing every namespace, not
pairwise). It keys on the declared namespace (was folder basename) and fires
only across 2+ distinct namespaces — when plugins share a declared name, the
namespace-collision finding (medium) is the right signal, so this stays silent.
Removes the inaccurate "only one wins" humanizer entry. Adds fixtures
(duplicate-command-name; a shared command in duplicate-plugin-name's colliding
namespace) and 4 tests. Suite 932->936. self-audit A 97 / A 100, scanners 13.
Two plugins that declare the same `name` in plugin.json collapse into one
component namespace (/name:command, name:skill, agent "name"). Resolution
between two installed same-name plugins is undocumented, so one plugin's
commands/skills/agents are silently shadowed and unreachable. PLH now flags
this at medium severity, keying on the declared `name` (not folder basename,
via new declaredName on scanSinglePlugin) with a COL-shaped details.namespaces
payload. Name-less plugins are excluded from the collision map.
Search-first (code.claude.com/docs/en/plugins): plugin components are
namespaced by the declared name, so a plugin component can never shadow a
user/project one — only a same-name collision loses components. This refutes
the original "plugin vs user vs project shadowing" framing in the backlog.
Adds humanizer pattern, fixture (duplicate-plugin-name: 2 colliding + 2
name-less), and 3 tests. Suite 929->932. self-audit A 97 / A 100, scanners 13.
Wave 2 / Step 4 of v5.1.0 plain-language UX humanizer rollout. Re-anchors
34 title-string assertions across 4 test files so they survive Wave 3's
title/description/recommendation rewriting at the CLI layer.
Anchoring strategy per scanner:
- GAP findings: scanner + category + recommendation substring (humanizer
preserves stable identifiers like CLAUDE.md, .mcp.json, hook in rec).
Hardcoded CA-GAP-NNN IDs for positive checks.
- HKV findings: scanner + evidence regex (evidence preserved verbatim).
- SET findings: scanner + evidence regex (evidence preserved verbatim).
- PLH findings: scanner + hardcoded CA-PLH-NNN IDs (no evidence on most
PLH findings, so ID is the only stable anchor for specific cases;
negative checks use scanner + title-substring spanning raw + humanized).
Per docs/v5.1.0-test-audit.md classification: only (b) WILL BREAK
assertions modified. (a) shape-only assertions (error-message formatting,
pure existence checks) untouched. tests/lib/output.test.mjs and
tests/lib/diff-engine.test.mjs and tests/scanners/fix-engine.test.mjs
unchanged (synthetic test inputs, not scanner output).
Test count unchanged: 689/689 pass. IDs harvested via deterministic
runtime dump per fixture (resetCounter + scan).
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.
New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.
Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.
Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
