§8's floor gate rests on §6.0's classification test, which is a judgment call
rather than a mechanical one. The four named must-survive items ("only Forgejo",
"bash is 3.2", the test command, "~/.claude is not git-tracked") are clear-cut —
any mechanism gets them right, so a fasit built from them proves nothing.
The gate is actually decided by blocks like "Conventional Commits:
type(scope): beskrivelse" (local convention or a nag the model follows anyway?),
"commit ofte med beskrivende meldinger", or the model-routing rubric — local
policy that reads like generic advice. §7.2 now requires 3-5 such blocks in the
fasit deliberately.
Cross-references verified: every section pointer in the brief (§1-§8, §6.0, §5A,
§3.1, §7.2) resolves to an existing heading. Shipping a dead prose reference in
the brief that proposes detecting them would have been an odd artifact — that is
CA-CML's finding class, v5.13 chunk 3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JNrtHo9hKSLKNyMS6b4Zuy
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
31073c2178