Addendum to plan Step 1, which stays open: the four bullets are still
`ubesvart` and the step's Verify still exits 1. Nothing measured changed.
The previous instruction was one sentence -- "upload via Customize -> Plugins,
run probe-versjon, check whether probe-tools appears" -- which assumed the
reader already knew where each of those lives and what counts as an answer.
The walkthrough now lives in the file the answers get written into, rather than
in a chat message that scrolls away.
Every UI path and caveat is sourced from research/03, not invented: the
install-from-file and drag-into-chat routes, connectors appearing under the
plugin's connectors page rather than as skills, the stale-cache issue (#69020)
that makes the 0.0.1 version check load-bearing, and the upload-does-not-
survive-relaunch report (#65426).
Two distinctions are called out because getting them wrong would produce a
confident wrong answer:
- `- python3:` measures the SANDBOX interpreter, not the host's. Cowork runs
shell commands in the VM or in the cloud. It is still the right thing to
measure, but it says nothing about the virtualenv Step 2 built.
- `- Host-MCP:` does run on the host, since local MCP servers were moved out
of the sandbox in May 2026. A `ja` there is what decision 7 rests on, so it
requires both that the connector is listed and that probe_ping answers --
"present but mute" is recorded as nei with a note, because absent and mute
point at different causes.
Section A is ordered first on purpose: cloud sessions are documented not to run
local MCP servers, so `sky` plus a `ja` on Host-MCP would contradict the
documentation and is a more interesting result than either answer alone.
The verify command in section F was executed as written from the rendered
document, not just pasted in: exit 1, as it must be while the probe is open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Plan Step 1. Builds the probe vehicle and the checklist; does NOT answer it.
The four questions all require the operator in a live Cowork session on this
Mac, and that is a fact about the measurement rather than a caveat: measured
2026-09-04, the session mode is not readable from disk (cowork_settings.json
carries only extraKnownMarketplaces; the desktop config carries
coworkNetworkMode and a trusted-folder list, neither states where a session
runs), and the other three each need a plugin installed in a live session.
The step's Verify is therefore RED on purpose and stays red until the operator
answers:
test "$(grep -cE '...' docs/cowork-probe.md)" = 4 -> exit 1 (0 of 4 matched)
Validated in both directions: a fully answered copy exits 0, a copy with three
of four answered exits 1. The gate can pass, so its failure means something.
Probe vehicle: jobbsok-probe, exactly four files under
tests/fixtures/cowork-probe/ -- manifest, skills/probe-versjon/SKILL.md,
.mcp.json declaring the stdio server probe-tools, and probe_tools.py (standard
library only). Smoke-tested from Claude Code: initialize handshake completes,
tools/list returns probe_ping, tools/call returns an interpreter version, an
unknown tool name is rejected. What is NOT verified is whether Cowork ever
starts it -- that is the question.
Archive is built from an explicit four-file include list, never zip -r over the
repo root; verified to contain no .git, STATE.md, .venv or .claude/ entry.
The degradation branch for each possible nei is written down now, before any
answer is known, so it is not decided under pressure later.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Operatoerbeslutning (b): revider planen foer M1. Ordre
20260904T135502Z-687411640-from-.claude, ti punkter, alle utfoert i
plan.md og brief.md under .claude/projects/ (local-only, gitignored) --
denne seksjonen i revisjonsrapporten er den sporede baereren.
Gater ved levering, kjoert 2026-09-04:
- plan-validator.mjs --strict: valid, 56 steg, 0 errors/warnings
- brief-validator.mjs: valid, 0 errors/warnings
- oekt 2s gate-script (33 grep-kriterier): PASS=33 FAIL=0
- grep -c 'Pass 2' plan.md: 6
- de tolv "Foreldet tekst"-greppene: PASS=12 FAIL=0
Ingen kode skrevet, ingen M1-steg utfoert. 56 steg inn, 56 steg ut.
Tre avvik fra ordreteksten, begrunnet i rapporten: --check i 5 av 6
Cowork-steg (steg 16 er M1, sak_status.py finnes foerst i steg 17);
det tolvte scriptet i avviksnoten er jobbsok_tools.py, ikke
kandidat_schema.py (som allerede sto der); Pass 2-seksjonen staar sist
i fila, der trekplan.md anviser, med peker fra planhodet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measures the two planning sessions and plan.md against docs/build-brief.md:
step traceability (0 of 56 unanchored, 15 derived), blocker closure (5 of 9
closed in step text, 4 partial), review-count discrepancies, dedup false
negative reproduced (Jaccard 0.236/0.404 vs 0.7), session token and cost
profile, and whether /trekplan --brief docs/build-brief.md is a valid input
(it is not: FM_MISSING). Recommendation: revise the listed steps first, then
M1 GO. No change to plan.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
