diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/README.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/README.md
index 2d07cc1..9b1b5b6 100644
--- a/plugins/linkedin-studio/README.md
+++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/README.md
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ For the pieces that build authority — newsletter editions, essays, series arti
 skeleton gate ──▶ voice scrub ──▶ fact-check ──▶ editorial craft gate ──▶
 persona resonance ──▶ cold adversarial review ──▶ visual assets ──▶ LOCK ──▶ hook conversion
    (before prose)      (de-AI)     (sources)        (is it well-made?)
-                                                  (does it land?)   (independent re-read)
+                                                  (does it land?)   (cold, headless)
 ```
 
 Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
 - **Skeleton before prose** — spine errors get caught in 15 minutes at the outline stage instead of a full day post-draft.
 - **Fact-check before lock** — claims after the model's knowledge cutoff *must* be web-searched; the more convincing a draft reads, the more verification, not less.
 - **Editorial craft gate** — an editor (not a reader) judges prose craft and narrative architecture: the blind spots a resonance sweep structurally cannot see.
-- **Cold adversarial review** — three reviewers re-read a frozen draft with *no* drafting-session context, so the version that ships is the version that's actually been independently reviewed.
+- **Cold adversarial review** — before lock, the draft can be frozen and re-read by reviewers carrying *no* drafting-session context (argument integrity, language, facts, and reader-fit), so a cold pass catches what the framing-biased in-session gates miss. Run it inline (Step 6.5) or in a fresh session via `/linkedin:headless-review` for maximum independence.
 
 The cost of fixing an error in a published edition is too high — so the gates run upstream, where fixes are cheap.