fix(linkedin-studio): propagate reconciled algorithm numbers, cite-not-restate
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6e2f26913
commit
4700248cc4
32 changed files with 133 additions and 113 deletions
|
|
@ -211,6 +211,6 @@ Use this template to record completed tests:
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Last updated: January 2026*
|
||||
*Last updated: 2026*
|
||||
|
||||
*Methodology adapted from growth marketing A/B testing principles, applied to LinkedIn's sequential posting model with adjustments for platform-specific confounders.*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Your first comment is a strategic tool, not an afterthought. Used correctly, it
|
|||
|
||||
## Why First Comments Matter
|
||||
|
||||
LinkedIn's 360Brew algorithm penalizes external links in post bodies by 25-40% reach suppression. The first comment is the accepted workaround — but it's much more than a link dump.
|
||||
External links in the post body correlate with lower reach (correlational, ~38% in 2026; LinkedIn denies an intentional penalty — see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`). A first comment is a common hedge — but lead with standalone value either way; it's much more than a link dump.
|
||||
|
||||
**First comment benefits:**
|
||||
- Avoids link penalty while still providing resources
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Alphabetical glossary of specialized terminology used across the plugin. Each te
|
|||
|
||||
## 3
|
||||
|
||||
### 360Brew
|
||||
### Profile/topic relevance
|
||||
LinkedIn's 150-parameter foundation model that validates creator profiles before distributing content. Checks expertise alignment across About section, Experience, content history, network quality, and engagement patterns. Content from unvalidated profiles receives limited distribution.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`, `skills/linkedin-studio/SKILL.md`, `agents/content-optimizer.md`
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Engagement priming technique performed 15-20 minutes before posting: identify 5
|
|||
## A
|
||||
|
||||
### Algorithm Penalty
|
||||
Negative signal triggers that reduce post reach. Known penalties: 5+ hashtags (-68%), external links in body (-25-40%), off-topic posts (-40-60%), engagement bait phrases (-30-50%).
|
||||
Signal triggers that correlate with lower reach: excessive hashtags, external links in the post body, off-topic posts (weak profile/topic alignment), and engagement-bait phrases. Magnitudes are directional — see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`, `references/linkedin-formats.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Systematic application of 8 universal thought leadership angles across the same
|
|||
**Used in:** `references/thought-leadership-angles.md`, `agents/content-planner.md`, `agents/trend-spotter.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Authority Score
|
||||
Composite metric measuring a creator's established expertise on a topic, derived from posting consistency, engagement quality, profile alignment (360Brew), and network validation. Higher authority unlocks broader distribution.
|
||||
Composite metric measuring a creator's established expertise on a topic, derived from posting consistency, engagement quality, profile alignment (topic-relevance), and network validation. Higher authority unlocks broader distribution.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `commands/strategy.md` (authority building absorbed in v2.0.0), `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Optimal content type distribution: 70% Educational (teach, frameworks, how-to),
|
|||
**Used in:** `skills/linkedin-studio/SKILL.md`, `agents/content-planner.md`, `references/linkedin-growth-playbook-2025-2026.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Pillars
|
||||
3-5 core expertise areas that define your LinkedIn focus. Used for topic consistency validation, gap analysis in content planning, and 360Brew alignment checks. Example for AI content: News, Implementation, Strategy, Tools.
|
||||
3-5 core expertise areas that define your LinkedIn focus. Used for topic consistency validation, gap analysis in content planning, and topic-relevance alignment checks. Example for AI content: News, Implementation, Strategy, Tools.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `agents/content-planner.md`, `references/ai-content-framework.md`, `skills/linkedin-studio/SKILL.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Posts maintaining relevance and engagement potential beyond the initial publicat
|
|||
**Used in:** `agents/content-repurposer.md`, `references/articles-strategy-guide.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Expertise Verification System
|
||||
LinkedIn's mechanism for validating creator authority: professional history, posting consistency on specific topics, relevant engagement, domain vocabulary usage, and performance track record. Feeds into 360Brew.
|
||||
LinkedIn's mechanism for validating creator authority: professional history, posting consistency on specific topics, relevant engagement, domain vocabulary usage, and performance track record. Feeds into topic-relevance.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `references/linkedin-growth-playbook-2025-2026.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Critical window (0-60 minutes post-publication) determining ~70% of a post's tot
|
|||
**Used in:** `skills/linkedin-studio/SKILL.md`, `references/linkedin-formats.md`, `agents/engagement-coach.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Four-Stage Distribution Model
|
||||
Sequential post distribution: Stage 1 (0-30s: Quality classifier + 360Brew validation) → Stage 2 (0-90min: Test to 6-10% of connections) → Stage 3 (1-24h: Extended if velocity good) → Stage 4 (24-72h+: Evergreen circulation).
|
||||
Sequential post distribution: Stage 1 (0-30s: Quality classifier + profile/topic-relevance validation) → Stage 2 (0-90min: Test to 6-10% of connections) → Stage 3 (1-24h: Extended if velocity good) → Stage 4 (24-72h+: Evergreen circulation).
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ LinkedIn's feature (2025-2026) measuring user interest in specific topics indepe
|
|||
## L
|
||||
|
||||
### Link Penalty
|
||||
Algorithm penalty of -25-40% reach for external links placed in the post body. LinkedIn prioritizes keeping users on-platform. Workaround: place links in the first comment instead, or use native document format.
|
||||
External links in the post body correlate with lower reach (correlational, ~38% in 2026; LinkedIn denies an intentional penalty — see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`). Lead with standalone value; a first comment is a hedge, not a fix, and native document format is the durable answer.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`, `references/first-comment-strategy.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -249,3 +249,4 @@ Deviation from established personal voice profile. Measured across 6 dimensions:
|
|||
Quantified signature of a creator's unique writing style across sentence structure, vocabulary, hook preferences, storytelling approach, tone, and formatting. Updated quarterly. Identity-level traits (avoided words, tone, humor) are protected from automatic modification.
|
||||
|
||||
**Used in:** `agents/voice-trainer.md`, `assets/voice-samples/authentic-voice-samples.md`
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ The 90-day system covers 0-2K followers. This section provides the roadmap from
|
|||
|----------|-----------|---------|
|
||||
| Core expertise posts | 3-5x/week | Algorithm learning |
|
||||
| Strategic commenting | Daily 20 min | Network expansion |
|
||||
| Profile optimization | Monthly review | 360Brew validation |
|
||||
| Profile optimization | Monthly review | profile/topic-relevance validation |
|
||||
| Content experimentation | Ongoing | Finding what works |
|
||||
|
||||
**Growth Levers:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||
- Top 1% of creators: content rose from 15% to 31% of all feeds
|
||||
- Algorithm now prioritizes topical authority over everything else
|
||||
- Dwell time became the golden metric
|
||||
- External links penalized 25-40%
|
||||
- External links in the body correlate with lower reach (see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- Hashtags died as discovery mechanism (late 2024)
|
||||
|
||||
**What This Means for Format Selection:**
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Choosing the right format isn't just about engagement rates—it's about underst
|
|||
- Best for: Frameworks, step-by-step guides, data visualization
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Native documents (PDFs): High engagement (historically 24.42%, likely inflated)**
|
||||
- Note: The 24.42% figure is from 2025 studies that conflated PDF documents with multi-image carousels. Current carousel-specific data shows 1.92% engagement rate (still highest of all formats). PDF documents may still perform higher due to download value.
|
||||
- Note: documents/carousels are the top organic format (~7%; see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`). Cross-study rates (7% / 21.8% / 49.5%) differ by denominator/methodology, not by which format wins — do not treat any single figure as the carousel rate.
|
||||
- Great for frameworks, step-by-step content, detailed insights
|
||||
- Keeps users on platform (no external link penalty)
|
||||
- Downloadable = high perceived value
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Choosing the right format isn't just about engagement rates—it's about underst
|
|||
- Best for: Audience research, engagement spikes, starting conversations
|
||||
|
||||
**7. Link posts: AVOID or use strategically**
|
||||
- External links reduce reach by 25-40%
|
||||
- External links in the body correlate with lower reach (see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- 4.9% more impressions than no-link posts (OLD DATA - now penalized)
|
||||
- Platform wants to keep users on LinkedIn
|
||||
- If must link: Use native LinkedIn article or wait until second-tier comment
|
||||
|
|
@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ Algorithm prioritizes content that keeps users on platform longer.
|
|||
### The External Link Penalty
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical reality:**
|
||||
- External links reduce reach by 25-40%
|
||||
- External links in the body correlate with lower reach (see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- Links in post body get penalized most heavily
|
||||
- First comment links are tracked but acceptable as workaround when necessary
|
||||
- Old strategy of "drive traffic to website" is now algorithmically punished
|
||||
|
|
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ Immediate engagement in first hour is critical for triggering subsequent waves.
|
|||
- Strong first-hour engagement velocity
|
||||
|
||||
**What the algorithm penalizes:**
|
||||
- External links (25-40% reach reduction)
|
||||
- External links (correlate with lower reach — see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- Engagement bait phrases
|
||||
- AI-generated generic comments
|
||||
- Topic inconsistency (confuses your expertise)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Complete reference guide for growing from hundreds to thousands of engaged follo
|
|||
### Engagement Quality Hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
**Comment Value:**
|
||||
- Comments: **15x more reach** than likes
|
||||
- Comments rank above likes in the engagement order (saves > shares > quality comments > reactions; see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- Comments: **5x more effective** than reshares
|
||||
- Comments over 15 words: **2x impact** vs shorter ones
|
||||
- Comments from relevant professionals: Significantly higher weight than generic responses
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ LinkedIn doesn't formally boost new creators, but multiple mechanisms create a d
|
|||
**Why New Creators Get Natural Advantages:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Clean Algorithmic Slate:** No negative history, no low-performing posts dragging down distribution. The algorithm evaluates new creators purely on current content quality.
|
||||
2. **Interest-Based Distribution via 360Brew:** The 2025-2026 interest graph actively seeks diverse voices for each topic. New creators with clear expertise signals get surfaced to relevant audiences immediately.
|
||||
2. **Interest-Based Distribution via topic-relevance:** The 2025-2026 interest graph actively seeks diverse voices for each topic. New creators with clear expertise signals get surfaced to relevant audiences immediately.
|
||||
3. **Feed Diversification:** LinkedIn explicitly increased content from outside users' networks by 40%. New creators benefit disproportionately — they ARE the fresh voices the algorithm seeks.
|
||||
4. **Faster Relative Growth Rates:** Buffer's 2025 data shows accounts with 1K-5K followers grow 40%+ YoY faster than large accounts (100K+). Small accounts compound faster when they post consistently.
|
||||
5. **No Audience Fatigue:** Established creators face diminishing returns with existing followers. New creators present novel perspectives to every viewer.
|
||||
|
|
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ The advantage isn't a formal "boost" with a cliff — it's a window where consis
|
|||
|
||||
**Days 1-30: Signal Establishment**
|
||||
- Algorithm is mapping your expertise areas from profile + content
|
||||
- Every post teaches 360Brew what topics you cover
|
||||
- Every post teaches topic-relevance what topics you cover
|
||||
- Format experiments have low cost (small audience, no expectations)
|
||||
- Priority: Post 4-5x/week to give the algorithm enough data points
|
||||
- Focus: Topical consistency within your 5 expertise areas
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ This isn't vanity metrics—it's market perception of your expertise.
|
|||
**The error:** Constantly driving traffic away from LinkedIn
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it fails:**
|
||||
- 25-40% reach reduction for external links
|
||||
- External links in the body correlate with lower reach (see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`)
|
||||
- Algorithm wants users on platform
|
||||
- Looks desperate for traffic
|
||||
- Breaks the value-first approach
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ LinkedIn users scroll fast. Your visual has 1-2 seconds to communicate its value
|
|||
|
||||
### Carousel (PDF Document)
|
||||
**Best for:** Frameworks, how-to guides, listicles, comparisons, stories
|
||||
**Engagement pattern:** Highest overall engagement rate (6.6%), excellent dwell time
|
||||
**Engagement pattern:** Top-performing organic format (~7%; see `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`), excellent dwell time
|
||||
**Use when:** Content has 5+ distinct points that benefit from visual separation
|
||||
|
||||
**Design pattern per slide:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Before adjusting tactics, identify root causes:
|
|||
|
||||
1. **Consistency gap:** Actual posts/week < weekly goal for 3+ consecutive weeks
|
||||
2. **Topic scatter:** Posts span 6+ topics with no clear pillar dominance
|
||||
3. **Profile-content mismatch:** 360Brew misalignment between headline/about and post topics
|
||||
3. **Profile-content mismatch:** profile/topic misalignment between headline/about and post topics
|
||||
4. **Engagement vacuum:** Average comments < 5 per post, no regular commenters
|
||||
5. **Format stagnation:** 90%+ text-only posts, no carousels/documents
|
||||
6. **Network isolation:** No collaborations in last 60 days, commenting on < 5 creators/day
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Before adjusting tactics, identify root causes:
|
|||
- `/linkedin:audit` -- full strategy review with trajectory overlay
|
||||
- `/linkedin:strategy` -- recalibrate growth plan
|
||||
- `/linkedin:pipeline` -- activate full content pipeline for volume increase
|
||||
- `/linkedin:profile` -- 360Brew profile optimization
|
||||
- `/linkedin:profile` -- profile/topic-relevance optimization
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Understanding how to recover from algorithmic suppression is critical for long-t
|
|||
- Profile views declining despite posting
|
||||
|
||||
**Common causes:**
|
||||
1. **Profile-content mismatch (360Brew failure)** - Algorithm validates profile before distributing content
|
||||
1. **Profile-content mismatch (profile/topic mismatch)** - Algorithm validates profile before distributing content
|
||||
2. **Topic inconsistency** - Confused algorithm about your expertise
|
||||
3. **Engagement pod detection** - Artificial engagement patterns flagged
|
||||
4. **External link overuse** - LinkedIn penalizes directing traffic away
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ Understanding how to recover from algorithmic suppression is critical for long-t
|
|||
- [ ] Update headline with 3-4 topic keywords matching your content
|
||||
- [ ] Rewrite About section with clear expertise areas
|
||||
- [ ] Remove or update irrelevant Featured content
|
||||
- [ ] Check Skills section matches post topics (critical for 360Brew)
|
||||
- [ ] Check Skills section matches post topics (critical for topic-relevance)
|
||||
- [ ] Request 2-3 skill endorsements from connections in your content areas
|
||||
- [ ] Review Experience descriptions for topic alignment
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ Understanding how to recover from algorithmic suppression is critical for long-t
|
|||
|
||||
## Timeline Expectations
|
||||
|
||||
### Mild Suppression (25-40% reach drop)
|
||||
### Moderate Suppression (link / off-topic)
|
||||
|
||||
- Initial improvement: 7-10 days
|
||||
- Recovery to baseline: 14-21 days
|
||||
|
|
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ Maintain these practices to avoid future suppression:
|
|||
- [ ] Avoid engagement pods entirely (easily detected)
|
||||
- [ ] Limit external links to 1x per week maximum
|
||||
- [ ] Monitor reach weekly for early warning signs
|
||||
- [ ] Keep profile and content aligned (360Brew validation)
|
||||
- [ ] Keep profile and content aligned (profile/topic-relevance validation)
|
||||
- [ ] Respond to all comments within first hour
|
||||
- [ ] Engage with others' content daily (10+ substantive comments)
|
||||
- [ ] Use native formats primarily (text, carousels, LinkedIn video)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue