fix(linkedin-studio): S15 — UX finish §6c (B1 onboarding inline-draft + B3 carousel full-deck clipboard)
B2 (router tiering) was already delivered in S14, so S15 = B1 + B3 only. No surface/count/version change -> within-v4.1.0 refinement (S11-S13 precedent). - B1 (commands/onboarding.md): replace the "Run /linkedin:first-post" dead-end hand-off in Phase 3 with the first-post drafting steps embedded inline (3.1 topic -> 3.2 3-line draft -> 3.3 QC -> 3.4 present+clipboard -> 3.5 state-update that sets first_post_date). Wizard now yields a draft in-flow; 0 dead-end strings. Stays within the existing allowed-tools (Read/Bash/AskUserQuestion); UI-brief §12b scope-guard honored (no provider seams / progressive-disclosure added). - B3 (commands/carousel.md): Step 6 now assembles the ENTIRE deck (every slide's copy + the caption) into the clipboard payload, not just the caption; full-deck assembly precedes the clipboard-helper.mjs call. Independent /trekreview (2 Opus reviewers): brief-conformance 0 findings; code-correctness 1 MAJOR that is PRE-EXISTING and out of S15 scope (onboarding Phase 2 saves need Write in allowed-tools; lines 142/157, untouched by the S15 diff) -> DEFERRED to next session per "ekte design-funn -> neste sesjon". Verdict ALLOW for the delivered scope (not a WARN-override). Gate: test-runner.sh 74/0/0; node --test 98/98; commands=29; v4.1.0 unchanged. See docs/remediation/review.md for the full record (ALLOW + 1 deferred MAJOR). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
baca30feb1
commit
8c52bdb2e4
3 changed files with 191 additions and 128 deletions
|
|
@ -188,11 +188,29 @@ Create one slide per page using the content above.
|
|||
Export as PDF and upload directly to LinkedIn.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Auto-copy the carousel caption text to clipboard silently:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
printf '%s' '<CAROUSEL_CAPTION>' | node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/clipboard-helper.mjs
|
||||
**Assemble the entire deck** — every slide's copy (header + body, plus its visual note) followed by the caption — into ONE clipboard payload, so the whole carousel travels in a single copy, not just the caption. A carousel's deliverable is the slide text you paste into your design tool *and* the caption; copying only the caption left the bulk of the work uncopied. Build the payload like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Then confirm: "Caption copied to clipboard."
|
||||
SLIDE 1 of [TOTAL] — [purpose]
|
||||
[HEADER]
|
||||
[BODY line 1]
|
||||
[BODY line 2]
|
||||
...
|
||||
Visual: [visual note]
|
||||
|
||||
SLIDE 2 of [TOTAL] — [purpose]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
— — —
|
||||
CAPTION
|
||||
[caption text]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then auto-copy the full deck to clipboard silently:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
printf '%s' '<FULL_DECK_PAYLOAD>' | node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/clipboard-helper.mjs
|
||||
```
|
||||
Substitute `<FULL_DECK_PAYLOAD>` with the assembled deck above — all slides' copy + the caption. Then confirm: "Full deck — [N] slides + caption — copied to clipboard."
|
||||
|
||||
Offer refinement options as text (no interactive prompt):
|
||||
"Want to refine? Options: adjust slide text / change visual style / regenerate specific slide / different hook / ready for publishing."
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -166,28 +166,76 @@ After setup, recalculate and show updated score.
|
|||
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════╝
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Check `first_post_date` in state file:
|
||||
Check `first_post_date` in state file.
|
||||
|
||||
**If null (no first post yet):**
|
||||
- "You're ready to create your first post! This is the most important step — your first post doesn't need to be perfect, it needs to EXIST."
|
||||
- Use AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
1. **Guided first post** (10 min) — Maximum hand-holding, simple format → routes to `/linkedin:first-post` workflow
|
||||
2. **Quick post** (5 min) — You already know what to say → routes to `/linkedin:quick` workflow
|
||||
3. **Not now** — I'll post later
|
||||
**If first_post_date is set (returning user):**
|
||||
- "You already have your first post (published [date]). Ready for your next one? Use `/linkedin:post` or `/linkedin:quick` whenever you are." Move to Phase 4.
|
||||
|
||||
**If first_post_date is set:**
|
||||
- "You already have your first post (published [date]). Ready to create your next one?"
|
||||
- Use AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
1. **Create a new post** → suggest `/linkedin:post`
|
||||
2. **Quick post** → suggest `/linkedin:quick`
|
||||
3. **Exit onboarding**
|
||||
**If null (no first post yet) — draft it inline, right here:**
|
||||
|
||||
**If user chooses to post (option 1 or 2):** Don't invoke the sub-command directly — instead, tell them:
|
||||
"Run `/linkedin:first-post` to start the guided first-post flow."
|
||||
or
|
||||
"Run `/linkedin:quick` to create a quick post."
|
||||
"This is the most important step — your first post doesn't need to be perfect, it needs to EXIST. Let's write it now, together, in this flow."
|
||||
|
||||
This keeps the onboarding context clean and lets the post commands manage their own workflow.
|
||||
Use AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
1. **Write my first post now** — Draft it inline, ~5 minutes, ready to paste
|
||||
2. **Not now** — I'll post later (you can use `/linkedin:post` or `/linkedin:quick` anytime)
|
||||
|
||||
**If "Not now":** move to Phase 4 and mark the first post Pending.
|
||||
|
||||
**If "Write my first post now":** walk through these steps **inline** — do NOT hand off to another command. The post is produced right here in the wizard.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 — Pick a topic
|
||||
|
||||
Use AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
1. **Something I learned recently** — a specific insight from your work
|
||||
2. **A tool or approach I recommend** — something that made your work better
|
||||
3. **An observation about my industry** — a pattern or trend you've noticed
|
||||
4. **A question I'm genuinely curious about** — start a conversation
|
||||
|
||||
Then ask: "Give me a sentence or two about what you have in mind." If expertise areas are set in the state file, steer the topic toward one of their pillars.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 — Write the post (3-line formula)
|
||||
|
||||
Draft the post using the voice profile from Phase 2 (or the existing `assets/voice-samples/` profile):
|
||||
- **Line 1 — Hook (under 140 chars):** specific to their experience, no generic opening
|
||||
- **Line 2 — Context (1-3 sentences):** the what and why, kept tight
|
||||
- **Line 3 — Insight + question:** their takeaway, ending on a genuine question that invites comments
|
||||
|
||||
Target 150-500 characters (short posts perform well for new accounts). One point, not three. No external links in the post body.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 — Quick quality check
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm 4 things before presenting:
|
||||
- [ ] Hook works in 140 chars?
|
||||
- [ ] ONE clear point (not three)?
|
||||
- [ ] Ends with a question or invitation?
|
||||
- [ ] Sounds like THEM (not corporate/AI)?
|
||||
|
||||
Fix any miss before showing it.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.4 — Present and copy
|
||||
|
||||
Show the post with its character count, the hook highlighted, and one alternative hook. Auto-copy the post text to clipboard silently:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
printf '%s' '<POST_TEXT>' | node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/clipboard-helper.mjs
|
||||
```
|
||||
Then say: "Post copied to clipboard. Go to linkedin.com, click 'Start a post', paste it, and hit Post."
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.5 — Record it
|
||||
|
||||
Update state deterministically (this sets `first_post_date` automatically when null):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
node --input-type=module -e "
|
||||
import { writeState, updatePostTracking } from '${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/state-updater.mjs';
|
||||
writeState(content => updatePostTracking(content, {
|
||||
postDate: 'YYYY-MM-DD',
|
||||
postTopic: 'topic_area',
|
||||
hookText: 'Hook text here...',
|
||||
charCount: NNNN,
|
||||
format: 'post'
|
||||
}));
|
||||
"
|
||||
```
|
||||
Replace the placeholders with the actual post data, then continue to Phase 4.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Summary and Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -201,7 +249,7 @@ Show final status:
|
|||
```
|
||||
Profile: [Optimized / Skipped — run /linkedin:profile later]
|
||||
Personalization: [XX]% [↑ from YY% if improved]
|
||||
First post: [Published DATE / Pending — run /linkedin:first-post]
|
||||
First post: [Published DATE / Pending — create anytime with /linkedin:post or /linkedin:quick]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What's next — your first week:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,145 +1,142 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: trekreview
|
||||
review_version: "1.0"
|
||||
task: "S14 — journey layer over the LinkedIn Studio command surface (operator-reframed from merge/cut after 14a found zero redundancy)"
|
||||
task: "S15 — UX finish §6c on the final 29-command set: B1 onboarding inline-draft + B3 carousel full-deck clipboard (B2 router-tiering already delivered in S14)"
|
||||
slug: remediation
|
||||
project_dir: docs/remediation/
|
||||
brief_path: docs/remediation/brief.md
|
||||
scope_sha_start: 431a893
|
||||
scope_sha_end: 431a893
|
||||
reviewed_files_count: 15
|
||||
scope_sha_start: baca30f
|
||||
scope_sha_end: baca30f
|
||||
reviewed_files_count: 2
|
||||
verdict: ALLOW
|
||||
mode: default
|
||||
effort: high
|
||||
effort: standard
|
||||
profile: premium
|
||||
findings: []
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Review — linkedin-studio S14 (journey layer; merge/cut → add a layer)
|
||||
# Review — linkedin-studio S15 (UX finish §6c: B1 onboarding inline + B3 carousel full-deck)
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict: ALLOW** (post-remediation) — 0 BLOCKER, 0 MAJOR, 0 MINOR, 0 SUGGESTION open.
|
||||
Two independent reviewers (brief-conformance, code-correctness) ran COLD, high-effort,
|
||||
without cross-feeding, on the as-delivered uncommitted working tree (HEAD `431a893` +
|
||||
the S14 delta). **Each returned 2 MAJOR findings; deduped to 3 distinct issues.** All
|
||||
three were **remediated in-session** with deterministic re-verification; the final
|
||||
state that pushes is clean.
|
||||
**Verdict: ALLOW** for S15's delivered scope — 0 BLOCKER, 0 MAJOR, 0 MINOR, 0 SUGGESTION
|
||||
**attributable to the S15 diff**. Two independent reviewers (brief-conformance,
|
||||
code-correctness) ran COLD, without cross-feeding, on the as-delivered uncommitted
|
||||
working tree (HEAD `baca30f` + the S15 delta = two command files).
|
||||
|
||||
S14 was **reframed by operator decision (2026-05-30)**: 14a's cold per-command review
|
||||
(`command-rationalization.md`) found **zero redundancy** across the 27 commands (no
|
||||
defensible merge/cut), so instead of cutting, a **journey layer** was added over the
|
||||
kept atomics. Build contract: `journey-layer-design.md`. Delivered: two new
|
||||
delegate-only front-doors (`/linkedin:create`, `/linkedin:measure`), the router
|
||||
re-tiered into five journeys (Start · Create · Engage · Measure · Grow), `onboarding`/
|
||||
`strategy` elevated as the Start/Grow front-doors; 27 → 29 commands; v4.0.0 → v4.1.0
|
||||
(minor/additive). Two of 14a's honesty nits (router lists `firsthour`; `calendar`
|
||||
cross-links to it) were real and fixed; a third (a `competitive` 1K-gating claim) was
|
||||
withdrawn as unfounded on verification.
|
||||
- **brief-conformance-reviewer:** 0 findings. B1 and B3 both trace to delivered code; the
|
||||
binding §12b scope-guard is honored (no extensibility / provider-seam / progressive-
|
||||
disclosure / detect-and-offer language entered the diff); no version/count drift
|
||||
(19/29/25/6 intact, v4.1.0 untouched); no files outside the two in scope.
|
||||
- **code-correctness-reviewer:** 1 MAJOR — but **pre-existing and outside S15's scope**
|
||||
(see Findings). The S15 changes themselves are correct: branches all terminate, the
|
||||
state-updater + clipboard snippets mirror the established `first-post.md` pattern
|
||||
exactly, `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` is the established path var, and the larger carousel
|
||||
clipboard payload introduces no new failure mode over the uniform plugin pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
**What both reviewers confirmed conformant + correct** (the bulk of the delivery):
|
||||
the two front-doors are delegate-only (no `Write`; route to the contracted targets);
|
||||
the router re-tier preserves **reachability for all 29 commands** (no atomic dropped;
|
||||
`post-feedback-monitor` still mentioned in prose, not orphaned); `EXPECT_COMMANDS`
|
||||
27→29 + `## Commands (29)` + `ls`=29 agree; version 4.1.0 is consistent across
|
||||
plugin.json / README version badge / CLAUDE.md header / CHANGELOG / root docs; SemVer
|
||||
framing is honest (additive, nothing falsely "breaking", nothing removed/renamed);
|
||||
out-of-scope discipline held (no atomic folded; `multiplatform`-develop only recorded,
|
||||
not built; S16/S17/UI-brief-M0 untouched).
|
||||
S15 = **B1 + B3 only**. B2 (router tiering) was already delivered in S14 (the finish-plan
|
||||
S15 body still lists B2, but the S14 amendment + the session-state label supersede it);
|
||||
its absence here is correct, not a gap.
|
||||
|
||||
## Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
Scope: HEAD `431a893` (S13's commit) + the **uncommitted S14 working-tree delta**
|
||||
Scope: HEAD `baca30f` (S14's commit) + the **uncommitted S15 working-tree delta**
|
||||
(annotated `[uncommitted]` — a brief-level contract; the brief's Assumptions allow
|
||||
uncommitted review). 15 files = the operator's own changes; the 3 untracked
|
||||
not-mine files (`docs/linkedin-studio-persona-brief.md`, `…-ui-brief.md`,
|
||||
`docs/voyage-build/progress.json`) are explicitly excluded from scope and from the
|
||||
commit. **No silent skips.**
|
||||
uncommitted review). 2 files = the operator's own changes. The 3 untracked not-mine files
|
||||
(`docs/linkedin-studio-persona-brief.md`, `…-ui-brief.md`, `docs/voyage-build/progress.json`)
|
||||
are explicitly excluded from scope and from the commit. **No silent skips.**
|
||||
|
||||
| Treatment | Count | Notes |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|-------|
|
||||
| `deep-review` | 6 | `commands/create.md` `[new]`, `commands/measure.md` `[new]`, `commands/linkedin.md` (router re-tier), `commands/calendar.md`, `scripts/test-runner.sh`, `README.md` |
|
||||
| `summary-only` | 9 | plugin `CLAUDE.md`/`CHANGELOG.md`/`plugin.json`/`commands/onboarding.md`; root `CLAUDE.md`/`README.md`; `docs/remediation/{finish-plan.md, command-rationalization.md, journey-layer-design.md}` |
|
||||
| `deep-review` | 0 | neither file is under `hooks/**` / `auth/**` / `crypto/**` / `**/security/**` |
|
||||
| `summary-only` | 2 | `commands/onboarding.md` (Phase 3 rewrite + 1 Phase-4 summary line), `commands/carousel.md` (Step 6 clipboard) |
|
||||
| `skip` | 0 | no lockfiles / svg / generated / dist |
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-cutting execution criteria (run by orchestrator):**
|
||||
`scripts/test-runner.sh` → **74 passed / 0 failed / 0 warnings**, exit 0 (was 71;
|
||||
+2 the two new commands' frontmatter checks, +1 a new README commands-badge guard,
|
||||
−1 net rounding of the count-loop — all green). `node --test …/*.test.mjs` → **98/98**
|
||||
(no hook logic changed). `ls commands/*.md` → **29**.
|
||||
**B1/B3 acceptance checks (orchestrator-run greps):**
|
||||
- B1: `grep -E "[Rr]un \`?/linkedin:first-post" commands/onboarding.md` → **0 dead-end strings**;
|
||||
inline draft steps 3.1–3.5 present (topic → 3-line draft → QC → present+clipboard → state-update that sets `first_post_date`).
|
||||
- B3: full-deck assembly block at `carousel.md:191` precedes the `clipboard-helper.mjs` call at `:211`; payload contains slide text; caption-only `<CAROUSEL_CAPTION>` removed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-cutting execution criteria:** `scripts/test-runner.sh` → **74 passed / 0 failed /
|
||||
0 warnings**, exit 0. `node --test hooks/scripts/__tests__/*.test.mjs` → **98/98** (no hook
|
||||
logic changed). `ls commands/*.md` → **29** (no surface-count change; no version bump —
|
||||
consistent with S11–S13 precedent: within-scope refinements stay at the current version).
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
**3 distinct MAJOR findings were raised by the independent reviewers and ALL closed
|
||||
in-session.** No finding remains open; the trailing JSON `findings` is empty because
|
||||
the pushed state carries none.
|
||||
**0 findings attributable to the S15 diff.** One MAJOR was raised by code-correctness; on
|
||||
inspection it is **pre-existing and out of S15's scope**, and is routed to the next session
|
||||
per the finish-plan's locked constraint ("fix-in-next-session for any review finding") and
|
||||
the operator rule "ekte design-funn → neste sesjon" (in-session fix is reserved for the
|
||||
session's *own* lockstep misses). It is recorded below and propagated to STATE.md — **not
|
||||
dropped, not silenced.**
|
||||
|
||||
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] README commands badge stale at `commands-27`
|
||||
*Raised by both reviewers (`COUNT_DRIFT` / `SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET`), `README.md:11`.*
|
||||
The release reconciled the version badge, intro prose, CLAUDE.md header, `EXPECT_COMMANDS`,
|
||||
and rosters to 29, but the shields **commands** badge still read `commands-27-green`. It
|
||||
slipped both the human pass and the gate (the version-consistency grep checks only the
|
||||
*version* badge; the design-doc verification grep searched `"27 command"` with a space,
|
||||
which cannot match `commands-27-green`).
|
||||
**Resolution:** `README.md:11` → `commands-29-green`; **and** a new
|
||||
`test-runner.sh` Section-2 guard now asserts the `badge/commands-${EXPECT_COMMANDS}-`
|
||||
shields badge matches the contract (closing the class, not just the line — the
|
||||
count-badge analogue of the existing version-badge check). Re-verified: lint 74/0/0;
|
||||
`grep commands-27` → 0 hits.
|
||||
### [MAJOR — DEFERRED to next session] onboarding Phase 2 file-saves need `Write`, not in `allowed-tools`
|
||||
|
||||
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] Router self-contradicted on `competitive` gating
|
||||
*Raised by code-correctness (`INTERNAL_CONTRADICTION`), `commands/linkedin.md:140`.*
|
||||
The Grow journey **table** marked `competitive` "Any phase" and the gating-rule note
|
||||
said it is **not** gated, but the **"Ask the User"** menu line still rendered
|
||||
`competitive ⚿` (the file's own ~1K soft-gate marker). An interim erroneous gating
|
||||
(added then reverted in the same pass) had been reverted in the table + the gating note
|
||||
+ the design doc, but the menu line was missed — the exact inconsistency the release
|
||||
claims to fix.
|
||||
**Resolution:** `commands/linkedin.md` Ask-the-User Grow line → `competitive` (no ⚿);
|
||||
re-verified `grep "competitive ⚿"` → 0 hits across commands + the design doc. The router
|
||||
now states competitive ungated consistently in the table, the note, and the menu.
|
||||
*Raised by code-correctness (`PLAN_EXECUTE_DRIFT`), `commands/onboarding.md:142` (and `:157`).*
|
||||
|
||||
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] STATE.md binding count block stale at 27 / v4.0.0
|
||||
*Raised by brief-conformance (`SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET`), `STATE.md:46`.*
|
||||
The design-doc lockstep enumerates the STATE.md count block as a surface to update
|
||||
(27→29, v4.1.0). `STATE.md` is **gitignored** (not part of the pushed commit, so not a
|
||||
push-blocking three-doc violation), but it is a contracted lockstep item and would
|
||||
mislead the next session.
|
||||
**Resolution:** updated to 29 / v4.1.0 as part of the session-close STATE.md overwrite
|
||||
(which also advances the pointer to S15). Not in the pushed artifact (gitignored).
|
||||
`onboarding.md` frontmatter grants `allowed-tools: [Read, Bash, AskUserQuestion]` — no
|
||||
`Write`. **Phase 2** instructs "Save the responses to `assets/voice-samples/authentic-voice-samples.md`"
|
||||
(`:142`, with a REPLACE-vs-append rule) and "Save to `config/user-profile.local.md`" (`:157`).
|
||||
Persisting those profile files is a file write; the plugin's accepted pattern is the `Write`
|
||||
tool, and the sibling `first-post.md` (same voice-save) declares `Write` (`first-post.md:9-14`).
|
||||
With only Read/Bash/AskUserQuestion the agent cannot honor the two "Save to …" instructions
|
||||
(the only scripted Bash writes are the `node -e` state and clipboard snippets). **Real defect.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Why DEFERRED, not fixed in S15:**
|
||||
- **Pre-existing.** The gap exists identically at HEAD `baca30f` *before* the S15 edits —
|
||||
`git show HEAD:…/onboarding.md` shows `allowed-tools: [Read, Bash, AskUserQuestion]` already.
|
||||
- **Out of S15's diff scope.** The S15 hunks are `@@ -166` (Phase 3) and `@@ -201` (Phase 4
|
||||
summary line); lines 142/157 (Phase 2) are untouched. S15's *own* inline steps (3.1–3.5)
|
||||
stay within Read/Bash/AskUserQuestion and need no `Write` (3.4 clipboard = Bash, 3.5
|
||||
state-update = Bash `node -e`).
|
||||
- **Not introduced or worsened by S15.** The reviewer's "now owns the save flow" framing does
|
||||
not hold on inspection: Phase 2's saves are reached identically before and after S15, and
|
||||
the removed `/linkedin:first-post` hand-off was about *post creation* (Phase 3), not Phase 2's
|
||||
profile saves. S15 added no save-flow that needs `Write`.
|
||||
- **Operator governance.** Fixing a Phase-2 tool-contract bug inside an S15 (B1+B3) push would
|
||||
be exactly the "rydd opp i pre-existing som del av en bugfix" / scope-expansion the operator's
|
||||
rules forbid; the documented default for out-of-scope items is **defer** (record, route to
|
||||
next session) — not silently fix, not silently drop.
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended action (next session):** add `Write` to `onboarding.md`'s `allowed-tools`
|
||||
(matching `first-post.md:9-14`), or replace the two "Save to …" instructions with a `node -e`
|
||||
Bash write so the steps stay within the declared Bash grant. Natural home: fold into S16 (which
|
||||
already opens the onboarding/saves surface) or the S17 triage pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Remediation Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Gate: ALLOW (post-remediation).** Two independent high-effort reviewers found 3
|
||||
distinct MAJORs — all stale-count / incomplete-revert completion-misses of THIS
|
||||
session's own committed lockstep, none a design flaw. All three were closed in-session
|
||||
with deterministic re-verification (lint 74/0/0; targeted greps → 0 residual hits); a
|
||||
new lint guard prevents the badge regression class from recurring. No BLOCKER; no
|
||||
design or correctness defect in the journey layer itself; reachability for all 29
|
||||
commands preserved; SemVer honest. The pushed state is clean.
|
||||
**Gate: ALLOW** for S15's delivered scope (B1 + B3). Both reviewers confirm the two changes
|
||||
are conformant (brief) and correct (code); the binding §12b scope-guard held; no version/count
|
||||
drift; the inline first-post flow and the full-deck clipboard both function within the existing
|
||||
tool grants and established patterns. The single MAJOR is a **pre-existing, out-of-scope**
|
||||
tool-contract gap in Phase 2 that S15 neither introduced nor worsened; per the operator's
|
||||
explicit "ekte design-funn → neste sesjon" rule it is **deferred and recorded**, not fixed
|
||||
as scope creep. This is a genuine ALLOW of the scoped delivery — **not** a WARN-override (there
|
||||
is no open finding *against* S15's diff).
|
||||
|
||||
Decision rationale for in-session fix (vs `feedback_trekreview_always_last`'s
|
||||
fix-in-next-session): the three findings are mechanical completions of the current
|
||||
task's own lockstep — #1 and #2 would have failed the design doc's own Verification
|
||||
grep, #3 is an incomplete revert — i.e. *unfinished scope of S14*, not deliberation-
|
||||
needing review findings. Shipping a README badge that reads "27" and a router that
|
||||
self-contradicts on gating would be dishonest to the release's own claims. Closing them
|
||||
now reaches a genuine ALLOW (not a WARN-override).
|
||||
|
||||
Per Handover 6, this `review.md` is consumable by `/trekplan --brief …`; with an ALLOW
|
||||
verdict and no open findings, no follow-up plan is required — S14 may commit + push, and
|
||||
the finish-plan continues at S15.
|
||||
Per Handover 6, this `review.md` is consumable by `/trekplan --brief …`. With an ALLOW verdict
|
||||
on the delivered scope and the one deferred finding routed forward, S15 may commit + push, and
|
||||
the finish-plan continues at S16 (with the deferred `Write` gap reconciled there or in S17).
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"verdict": "ALLOW",
|
||||
"scope": { "sha_start": "431a893", "sha_end": "431a893", "reviewed_files_count": 15, "uncommitted_delta": true },
|
||||
"verdict_scope": "S15 delivered changes (B1 + B3); 2 files",
|
||||
"scope": { "sha_start": "baca30f", "sha_end": "baca30f", "reviewed_files_count": 2, "uncommitted_delta": true },
|
||||
"counts": { "BLOCKER": 0, "MAJOR": 0, "MINOR": 0, "SUGGESTION": 0 },
|
||||
"findings": [],
|
||||
"resolved_in_session": [
|
||||
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "README commands badge stale at 27", "file": "README.md", "line": 11, "rule_key": "COUNT_DRIFT", "resolution": "badge -> commands-29-green + new test-runner.sh commands-badge guard" },
|
||||
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "Router self-contradicts on competitive gating", "file": "commands/linkedin.md", "line": 140, "rule_key": "INTERNAL_CONTRADICTION", "resolution": "Ask-the-User Grow line competitive ⚿ -> competitive; 0 residual hits" },
|
||||
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "STATE.md binding count block stale at 27 / v4.0.0", "file": "STATE.md", "line": 46, "rule_key": "SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET", "resolution": "updated to 29 / v4.1.0 in session-close overwrite (gitignored, not pushed)" }
|
||||
"deferred_findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"severity": "MAJOR",
|
||||
"title": "onboarding Phase 2 file-saves need Write, not in allowed-tools",
|
||||
"file": "commands/onboarding.md",
|
||||
"line": 142,
|
||||
"rule_key": "PLAN_EXECUTE_DRIFT",
|
||||
"status": "pre-existing, out of S15 scope (Phase 2; S15 diff = Phase 3 + Phase 4 line)",
|
||||
"routed_to": "next session (S16 onboarding/saves surface, or S17 triage)",
|
||||
"recommended_action": "add Write to onboarding.md allowed-tools (match first-post.md:9-14), or replace the two 'Save to ...' instructions with a node -e Bash write"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dropped_findings": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue