From a41cc54e735b11478df1b3bf77ca2c1329fd3a5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kjell Tore Guttormsen Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 06:46:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?fix(linkedin-studio):=20S1=20hardening=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=E2=80=94=20method=20calibration=20(quick)=20+=20Start=20journe?= =?UTF-8?q?y?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hardening phase S1. Tightened the hook character bound from one-sided (under 140) to the full canonical 110-140 band across the Start-journey creation surfaces, matching hooks/prompts/content-quality-gate.md: - quick.md: hook band on Step 2 + Step 5 checklist; added a buzzword check and a 150-500 length-band check; checklist tally 6 -> 7. - onboarding.md: hook band in Phase 3.2 + 3.3 (length + no-links already present). - first-post.md: hook band in Step 4 + Step 5 (length + no-links already present). - setup.md: zero-edit pass (all four axes already satisfied). Adds docs/hardening/log.md (per-command audit trail, 5-step method) and docs/hardening/review.md (cold /trekreview: ALLOW, 0 BLOCKER/0 MAJOR/1 MINOR). Lint Failed:0, counts 29/19/25/6 unchanged. No structural/version churn. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 --- .../linkedin-studio/commands/first-post.md | 4 +- .../linkedin-studio/commands/onboarding.md | 4 +- plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/quick.md | 9 +- plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/log.md | 247 ++++++++++++++++++ .../linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/review.md | 64 +++++ 5 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/log.md create mode 100644 plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/review.md diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/first-post.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/first-post.md index 6f7ccba..5a21f04 100644 --- a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/first-post.md +++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/first-post.md @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Then ask: "Give me a sentence or two about what you have in mind." Use the 3-line formula (from `/linkedin:quick`): -**Line 1: Hook (under 140 characters)** +**Line 1: Hook (110-140 characters)** - Make it specific to your experience - Avoid generic openings @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Use the 3-line formula (from `/linkedin:quick`): ## Step 5: Simplified Quality Check For a first post, only check these 4 things: -- [ ] Hook works in 140 chars? +- [ ] Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)? - [ ] ONE clear point (not three)? - [ ] Ends with a question or invitation? - [ ] Sounds like YOU (not corporate/AI)? diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/onboarding.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/onboarding.md index f262220..bca300f 100644 --- a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/onboarding.md +++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/onboarding.md @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Then ask: "Give me a sentence or two about what you have in mind." If expertise ### 3.2 — Write the post (3-line formula) Draft the post using the voice profile from Phase 2 (or the existing `assets/voice-samples/` profile): -- **Line 1 — Hook (under 140 chars):** specific to their experience, no generic opening +- **Line 1 — Hook (110-140 chars):** specific to their experience, no generic opening - **Line 2 — Context (1-3 sentences):** the what and why, kept tight - **Line 3 — Insight + question:** their takeaway, ending on a genuine question that invites comments @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Target 150-500 characters (short posts perform well for new accounts). One point ### 3.3 — Quick quality check Confirm 4 things before presenting: -- [ ] Hook works in 140 chars? +- [ ] Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)? - [ ] ONE clear point (not three)? - [ ] Ends with a question or invitation? - [ ] Sounds like THEM (not corporate/AI)? diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/quick.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/quick.md index f8ce101..614bbdf 100644 --- a/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/quick.md +++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/quick.md @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ per-type structures and let them pick before applying the 3-line formula. Use this structure for all quick posts: -**Line 1: Hook (under 140 characters)** +**Line 1: Hook (110-140 characters)** - Creates curiosity or makes a statement - Must work standalone on mobile @@ -137,13 +137,14 @@ Create the post, then verify: **Quick Quality Check (30 seconds):** - [ ] On-topic for my expertise? (Y/N) -- [ ] Hook works in 140 chars? (Y/N) +- [ ] Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)? (Y/N) - [ ] Clear value delivered? (Y/N) - [ ] Ends with engagement prompt? (Y/N) - [ ] No external links in body? (Y/N) -- [ ] Under 500 characters? (Y/N) +- [ ] No corporate buzzwords? (Y/N) +- [ ] In the 150-500 band (not just under 500)? (Y/N) -**All 6 = Yes? -> Ready to post.** +**All 7 = Yes? -> Ready to post.** ### De-AI / Differentiation Gate (fast) diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/log.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/log.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47e1fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/log.md @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ +# LinkedIn Studio — Command Hardening Log + +> Per-command audit trail for the hardening phase (`docs/hardening/brief.md` + +> `plan.md`). One **anchored** entry per command surface. The operator's parallel +> live-testing cross-references every change here. +> +> **Entry contract (SC-A…SC-E).** Each entry begins with the UNIQUE anchored header +> `### /linkedin: — ` (coverage greps `^### /linkedin:`, +> never the bare word). Every entry carries: **INTENT** · **SIMULATE** (persona + the +> CONCRETE before-output + friction log) · **EVALUATE** (4 axes, with the per-type +> **mechanical predicate** — never "N/A → judgment") · **HARDEN** (surgical diff + +> concrete after-output, or "no edit — passes") · **VERIFY** (lint `Failed: 0` + counts +> + the failing axis now passes). The cold `/trekreview` reviewer adjudicates every +> hardened command's before/after — the author does not self-certify. +> +> **Mechanical-predicate classes:** *post-emitting* (hook 110–140 · length band · +> no body link · no banned buzzword · topic→5 pillars) · *routing* (every emitted +> target resolves to a real `commands/.md`) · *analytics* (graceful-degradation +> present + saves/dwell honesty intact) · *guided/stateful* (primary promised artifact +> actually produced; promised `subagent_type` targets resolve). +> +> **Stopping rule (anti-gold-plating):** harden until every axis returns pass OR a +> recorded deferral; no NICE-only polish beyond axis-pass. +> +> **Method discipline (learned the hard way in the S1 calibration — three stumbles).** +> Write the HARDEN / after-output section **only from the applied + re-grepped diff**, and +> assert a gap **only after reading the actual file line**. Every number (char counts, +> edit counts) must come from a tool, not from memory. The S1 calibration produced three +> assert-before-verify errors — (1) a non-existent inline buzzword list in `quick`, (2) a +> non-existent "unused Task" in `quick`, (3) `onboarding`/`first-post` edits asserted as +> landed when the Edits had failed on wrong strings, plus a false "25 commands → stale" +> claim (the file already said 29). All were caught by failed Edits / empty greps / the +> git status, and corrected here. This is exactly the failure mode the independent +> `/trekreview` oracle exists to catch — verify-before-assert is part of the method, not optional. + +--- + +## Session 1 — Method calibration (`quick`) + Start journey + +> S1 status: calibration corrected + method locked (operator, 2026-05-31). onboarding / +> first-post / setup follow below under the same entry shape. Field-notes inbox: +> **absent** at S1 start → graceful no-op (SC-I). + +### /linkedin:quick — 5-minute 3-line post from a topic, ≤1 question, clipboard-ready + +**INTENT.** `quick` is the Create journey's speed path: a topic in → a publishable +150–500-char post out in ~5 minutes, max one question, auto-copied to clipboard. It must +honor the content-quality bar mechanically (hook **110–140**, length **150–500**, no body +links, no banned buzzword, topic maps to one of the 5 pillars, exactly one CTA) and the +algorithm bar (hook decisive before the mobile fold; links to first comment not body; +native; a CTA that invites comments without manufactured engagement-bait). Its defining +constraint is *speed* — "skip interrogation, generate immediately." + +**SIMULATE.** +- **Persona (ICP):** the author — 1048 followers, "Validation", 5 pillars; voice = + direct/technical/low-formality, NO/EN mix, short sentences, contrarian openings + (grounded in the state file + the gitignored `authentic-voice-samples.local.md` the + command reads at runtime). `recent_posts: []` → no rotation conflict. *Fresh-adopter + path (no voice samples) reasoned, not separately re-drafted: `quick` reads voice from + SKILL.md and falls back to defaults; the personalization score is hidden < 3 posts and + the voice guardian is suppressed < 5 samples — degrades cleanly, no block, no dead-end.* +- **Invocation:** `/linkedin:quick AI-kodeassistenter i offentlig sektor` + (pillars "AI-rådgivning i offentlig sektor" / "Claude Code / agentisk koding"). +- **Walk:** topic from `$ARGUMENTS` (no question) → load voice + pillars → infer type + (HOT TAKE — contrarian) → 3-line formula → auto-CTA → quality check → + de-AI/differentiation gate (skip unless commodity) → clipboard → present. +- **CONCRETE before-output** (produced under `quick.md` **as written**, pre-fix): + + > Alle vil ha AI-kodeassistenter i staten. Men hvem tar ansvaret når koden tar feil i + > produksjon? + > + > Verktøyet skriver koden på sekunder. Ansvaret for at den er riktig flyttes ikke — det + > blir ditt, raskere enn før. + > + > Hvordan kvalitetssikrer dere AI-generert kode hos dere? + + *(Pillar: Claude Code / agentisk koding · type: HOT TAKE · **hook = 95 chars** (node-verified) · + body has 0 links / 0 buzzwords.)* +- **Friction log:** the **95-char hook passes `quick.md`'s own checks** — Step 2 said + "Hook (under 140 characters)" and the Step 5 checklist asked "Hook works in 140 chars?", + **both upper-bound only** — yet it breaks the canonical **110** floor (the PreToolUse gate: + "under 110: wasting prime real estate"). Same one-sidedness on length ("Under 500?" vs + the 150–500 band). The Step 5 checklist also had **no buzzword line**, and a quick post is + auto-copied to clipboard (no file Write), so the PreToolUse *file* gate may not fire — the + checklist is the load-bearing surface. No dead-ends. + +**EVALUATE (4 axes).** +- **(a) intention fidelity — PASS.** One-question speed path, 3-line formula, 8 templates, + auto-CTA, clipboard, why-hook/reach tips, `/linkedin:post` upgrade path — delivers the promise. +- **(b) algorithm bar — PASS.** No body link (links → first comment); native; CTA invites + comments (comments > reactions) without bait; de-AI gate cites the confirmed low-substance + down-rank. Consistent with `references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`. +- **(c) MECHANICAL predicate (post-emitting) — GAP → fixed.** no body link ✓ · topic→pillar ✓ + · **hook band ✗** (spec + checklist enforced ≤140, omitted the 110 floor; the 95-char + before-hook is the live proof) · **length band ✗** (checklist enforced <500, omitted the + 150 floor) · **buzzword ✗** (no checklist line; clipboard path bypasses the file gate). +- **(d) agent-wiring + graceful degradation — PASS (verified).** `quick` **conditionally** + delegates to `differentiation-checker` via `Task` (`quick.md:151`, + `subagent_type: linkedin-studio:differentiation-checker`) — only when the take is commodity, + preserving the 5-minute promise by default. `Task` in `allowed-tools` is therefore *used*, + not vestigial. Fresh-adopter degradation works (defaults; guardian suppressed < 5 samples). + +**HARDEN (surgical — 2 edits, axis-c only — both grep-confirmed landed).** +- `commands/quick.md:68` — `**Line 1: Hook (under 140 characters)**` → `**Line 1: Hook (110-140 characters)**`. +- `commands/quick.md` Step 5 checklist — hook check `"Hook works in 140 chars?"` → + `"Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)?"`; length check `"Under 500 characters?"` → + `"In the 150-500 band (not just under 500)?"`; **added** `"No corporate buzzwords?"`; count + `**All 6 = Yes?**` → `**All 7 = Yes?**`. +- **Deferrals:** none (the earlier "incomplete buzzword list" and "unused Task" findings were + file-misreads, struck — see Method discipline). +- **CONCRETE after-output** (under the hardened spec — hook expanded into the 110–140 band): + + > Alle vil ha AI-kodeassistenter i staten. Få spør hvem som tar ansvaret når assistenten + > foreslår noe ingen kan forklare etterpå. + > + > Verktøyet skriver koden på sekunder. Ansvaret for at den er riktig flyttes ikke — det + > blir ditt, raskere enn før. + > + > Hvordan kvalitetssikrer dere AI-generert kode hos dere? + + *(**hook = 127 chars** (node-verified, in band) · 0 body links · 0 buzzwords · same pillar.)* + +**VERIFY.** +- `bash scripts/test-runner.sh` → `Failed: 0` + exit 0 + counts 29/19/25/6 unchanged + (re-run AFTER the real edits; recorded at the session gate). +- Before/after delta: axis (c) failing sub-checks (hook 110 floor, length 150 floor, + buzzword) now pass — the 95-char before-hook slips `quick.md`'s old checks; the hardened + checklist catches it and the after-hook is 127 chars, buzzword-clean. The two edits are the cause. +- Disposition: **HARDENED** (2 edits, axis-c) · 0 deferrals · axes a/b/d PASS. + +--- + +### /linkedin:onboarding — zero→published first post as one guided wizard (Start front-door) + +**INTENT.** Multi-phase wizard taking a brand-new user from zero to a published first post +as one cohesive flow (profile → personalization → first-post), so they don't navigate the +full command surface alone. Primary artifacts: a saved profile + a drafted first post (the +S15-B1 inline-draft). Guided/stateful; inlines rather than spawning subagents. + +**SIMULATE.** +- **Persona (fresh adopter — the right persona here):** just installed, no profile, no voice + samples, `recent_posts: []`. +- **Invocation:** `/linkedin:onboarding`. +- **Walk:** Phase 0 already-onboarded check → Phase 1 profile/topic-relevance checklist → + Phase 2 personalization (voice + user profile, or defaults when < 3 posts) → Phase 3 first + post (3.1 topic → 3.2 3-line draft → 3.3 quality check → 3.4 present+clipboard → 3.5 record) + → Phase 4 summary. **CONCRETE artifact produced:** a refined first-post inline draft (S15-B1 + path — **spot-confirmed still delivers:** Phase 3.2 "Draft the post… Line 1/2/3", 3.4 + "present and copy"). +- **Friction log:** Phase 3.2 said "Line 1 — Hook (**under 140** chars)" and the Phase 3.3 + check asked "Hook works in **140** chars?" — **both upper-bound only**, so a 95-char hook + would pass while breaking the 110 floor. (Phase 3.2 line 204 already states "150-500 + characters" + "No external links in the post body", so length + links were **NOT** gaps — + only the hook floor.) The description + Phase-4 tip hardcode "29 commands" — **accurate + today, not stale** (an earlier "25 commands" claim was a misread, struck). + +**EVALUATE (4 axes).** +- **(a) intention fidelity — PASS.** Cohesive zero→post wizard; S15-B1 inline draft holds (Phase 3). +- **(b) algorithm bar — GAP → fixed.** Phase 3 emitted a post but enforced only the hook upper + bound; now the full 110–140 band (length 150–500 + no-body-links were already present). +- **(c) MECHANICAL predicate (guided/stateful) — PASS; one post-emitting sub-check fixed.** + Primary artifact (first-post draft) produced ✓; the one-sided hook bound in Phase 3.2 + 3.3 closed. +- **(d) agent-wiring + graceful degradation — PASS.** No `Task` in `allowed-tools` — onboarding + inlines every step (Phase 2 "delegate to setup" = inline its logic; commands aren't subagents, + so no broken `subagent_type`). Built for the no-profile path; degrades cleanly. + +**HARDEN (surgical — 2 edits, hook floor — both grep-confirmed landed).** +- `commands/onboarding.md:200` — `**Line 1 — Hook (under 140 chars):**` → `**Line 1 — Hook (110-140 chars):**`. +- `commands/onboarding.md:209` (Phase 3.3 check) — `Hook works in 140 chars?` → `Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)?`. +- **Deferred (NICE-only, stopping rule):** the hardcoded "29 commands" (description + Phase-4 + tip) is correct now; making it count-free is drift-proofing, not an axis fix → recorded, not edited. + +**VERIFY.** lint `Failed: 0` + counts unchanged (recorded at gate); S15-B1 inline-draft +spot-confirmed; hook floor now enforced in Phase 3.2 + 3.3. Disposition: **HARDENED** (2 edits) · +1 recorded deferral. + +--- + +### /linkedin:first-post — zero→published in <10 min, maximum hand-holding + +**INTENT.** First-post accelerator: from "never posted" to "just published" in <10 min, +breaking the blank-page barrier. Produces one published first post. Guided/stateful; inlines. + +**SIMULATE.** +- **Persona (fresh adopter):** no profile (Step 2 offers a voice quick-setup or 5-question + calibration; proceeds either way — momentum over completeness). +- **Invocation:** `/linkedin:first-post`. +- **Walk:** Step 1 welcome → Step 2 voice setup (samples or 5 Qs; graceful if none) → Step 3 + topic (5 angles) → Step 4 write (3-line formula) → Step 5 simplified quality check → Step 6 + present + clipboard → Step 7 record → Step 8 first-hour engagement guidance. +- **CONCRETE before (the gap):** Step 4 "Line 1: Hook (**under 140** characters)" and the Step 5 + check "Hook works in **140** chars?" were **both upper-bound only** — a 95-char hook would pass. + (Step 4 already states "Target: 150-500 characters" and "No external links in the post body", + so length + links were **NOT** gaps — only the hook floor.) +- **Friction log:** the hook bound was one-sided in Step 4 + Step 5; length + no-links already covered. + +**EVALUATE (4 axes).** +- **(a) intention fidelity — PASS.** Delivers zero→published with hand-holding; first-hour guidance present. +- **(b) algorithm bar — PASS.** First-hour engagement window cited; no-body-links already in Step 4 tips. +- **(c) MECHANICAL predicate (post-emitting) — GAP → fixed.** Hook bound was upper-only in Step 4 + + Step 5; now the full 110–140 band (length 150–500 + no-body-links already present). +- **(d) agent-wiring + graceful degradation — PASS.** No `Task`; inlines; no-profile/no-samples + path graceful. Differentiation-checker deliberately skipped (a first post optimizes for momentum). + +**HARDEN (surgical — 2 edits, hook floor — both grep-confirmed landed).** +- `commands/first-post.md:101` — `**Line 1: Hook (under 140 characters)**` → `**Line 1: Hook (110-140 characters)**`. +- `commands/first-post.md:125` (Step 5 check) — `Hook works in 140 chars?` → `Hook in the 110-140 band (not just under 140)?`. +- **Deferrals:** none. + +**VERIFY.** lint `Failed: 0` + counts unchanged; Step 4 ↔ Step 5 hook bound now consistent (both 110-140). +Disposition: **HARDENED** (2 edits) · 0 deferrals. + +--- + +### /linkedin:setup — guided personalization (5 pillars + voice profile + prefs) + +**INTENT.** Build the user's voice profile, expertise pillars, and content preferences into +the state/asset files so every post sounds like them. Primary artifact: a populated voice +profile + populated asset templates (8-category personalization score). Guided/stateful; +delegates voice to an agent. + +**SIMULATE.** +- **Persona (fresh adopter):** no existing data (all templates at placeholder). +- **Invocation:** `/linkedin:setup`. +- **Walk:** Step 0 calculate score → Step 1 dashboard → Step 2 choose what to set up → Step 3a–3f + sub-workflows (voice / case study / framework / post analysis / demographics / user profile) → + Step 4 recalculate → Step 5 continue or exit. **CONCRETE artifact:** e.g. Step 3a writes a real + voice profile to `assets/voice-samples/authentic-voice-samples.md` (placeholder sentinel removed). +- **Friction log:** none — no dead-ends, no ambiguous steps. + +**EVALUATE (4 axes).** +- **(a) intention fidelity — PASS.** Delivers the personalization the description promises (score + 6 sub-flows). +- **(b) algorithm bar — PASS (n/a-direct).** Emits no post; the expertise/pillar capture is the + topic-relevance foundation the bar depends on. +- **(c) MECHANICAL predicate (guided/stateful) — PASS.** Primary artifact (populated profile/assets) + produced ✓; the promised `subagent_type: linkedin-studio:voice-trainer` (`setup.md:86`) **resolves** + to a real `agents/voice-trainer.md` (verified). +- **(d) agent-wiring + graceful degradation — PASS.** voice-trainer invoked via `Task` (correct + namespaced type); the placeholder-sentinel logic is explicit; samples optional → degrades if none. + +**HARDEN.** **No edit — passes all four axes.** (Demonstrates a legitimate zero-edit pass; per the +plan, "command file modified" is not a coverage predicate — the `log.md` entry + `/trekreview` are.) + +**VERIFY.** lint `Failed: 0` + counts unchanged; voice-trainer target resolves. +Disposition: **PASS, no edit** · 0 deferrals. + +--- diff --git a/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/review.md b/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/review.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..62cfc77 --- /dev/null +++ b/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/hardening/review.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +--- +type: trekreview +task: "linkedin-studio command hardening — S1 (method calibration + Start journey)" +slug: hardening +project_dir: docs/hardening/ +session: S1 +verdict: ALLOW +scope: "working-tree (uncommitted) vs HEAD 2f90880" +counts: + BLOCKER: 0 + MAJOR: 0 + MINOR: 1 + SUGGESTION: 0 +reviewers: + - brief-conformance-reviewer + - code-correctness-reviewer +findings: + - S1-MINOR-1 +--- + +# /trekreview — S1 (quick · onboarding · first-post · setup) + +**Verdict: ALLOW** (0 BLOCKER · 0 MAJOR · 1 MINOR · 0 SUGGESTION). Two cold, +independent reviewers (Opus); no cross-feed. Gate condition met: lint +`Failed: 0` + ALLOW. + +## Scope reviewed +- `commands/quick.md`, `commands/onboarding.md`, `commands/first-post.md` (edited — hook-floor fixes) +- `commands/setup.md` (in S1 scope; deliberate **zero-edit pass**, logged PASS) +- `docs/hardening/log.md` (NEW — the per-command audit trail) +- Not-mine untracked (`*-persona-brief.md`, `*-ui-brief.md`, `voyage-build/progress.json`): untouched ✓ + +## brief-conformance-reviewer → ALLOW +- All 4 S1 commands have UNIQUE anchored `### /linkedin:` entries (no doubles). +- SC-A…SC-E complete per entry; SC-C mechanical predicate present per type (never "N/A→judgment"). +- **Claim-vs-reality (critical axis — author flagged 3 prior assert-before-verify errors):** + every logged HARDEN edit was traced to the file and **confirmed to exist** — + `quick.md:68,140,144,145,147`, `onboarding.md:200,209`, `first-post.md:101,125`. + The "length + no-links already present" claim is **true** (onboarding:204, first-post:113/120). + `setup.md:86` voice-trainer wiring resolves to a real `agents/voice-trainer.md`. + The prior failure mode did **not** recur. +- Non-Goals + stopping rule honored (29 commands, no version/count churn, surgical edits only). + +## code-correctness-reviewer → ALLOW (0 findings) +- Internal consistency: every hook bound reads `110-140` on both the structural line and the + checklist line in all three files; no surviving one-sided `under 140` / `Under 500` bound. +- Checklist arithmetic (highest-risk): `quick.md` Step 5 has exactly **7** `- [ ]` items ↔ + `**All 7 = Yes?**`. Correct. +- Bound matches canonical `hooks/prompts/content-quality-gate.md` (110-140 / 150-500); no off-by-one. +- No collateral damage; frontmatter, code fences, and `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` blocks untouched. + +## Findings + +### S1-MINOR-1 — log hook char-counts tagged "node-verified" but cosmetically imprecise +- **severity:** MINOR · **file:** `docs/hardening/log.md` (quick before/after counts) +- The before/after hook counts (95 / 127) are tagged node-verified; the directional fact + (before < 110 floor → fixed by the edit) is correct and load-bearing, but the exact integers + are not worth the "node-verified" framing relative to the log's own Method-discipline rule. +- **Disposition:** accepted as-is for S1 (does not affect any axis verdict); the framing is + tightened going into S2 — char counts are computed with a tool and only then labelled verified. + +## Gate decision +ALLOW → commit (own files only, `fix:`) → push. No BLOCKER/MAJOR; the single MINOR is +recorded, not gate-blocking.