refactor(linkedin)!: rename plugin linkedin-thought-leadership → linkedin-studio (v3.0.0)

BREAKING CHANGE: the marketplace slug, the agent namespace
(linkedin-studio:<agent>), and the runtime state-file path
(~/.claude/linkedin-studio.local.md) all change. Reinstall required;
existing state migrated in place (post metrics, streak, history preserved).
The /linkedin:* commands are unchanged — the command namespace is set
per-command in frontmatter and was always independent of the plugin slug.
Functionality is byte-identical to v2.4.0; this release is pure identity.

- dir + manifests: plugins/linkedin-studio + plugin.json + root marketplace.json
- agent namespace updated in commands/newsletter.md (only functional invoker)
- state path updated in 4 hook scripts + topic-rotation prompt + state template
- catch-all skill dir renamed skills/linkedin-studio (5 functional skills unchanged)
- docs + version bump to 3.0.0 across README badge, CHANGELOG, root README/CLAUDE.md
- historical records (CHANGELOG past entries, docs/ build artifacts,
  config-audit v5.0.0 snapshots) intentionally retain the old slug

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

plugins/linkedin-studio/assets/frameworks/framework-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+# [Framework Name - e.g., "The 3-Stage RAG Maturity Model"]
+
+## Overview
+
+**One-sentence description:** [What this framework does - e.g., "A diagnostic tool for assessing and advancing organizational RAG implementation from basic to advanced."]
+
+**Problem it solves:** [What challenge this addresses - e.g., "Most organizations don't know where they are in their RAG journey or what to do next."]
+
+**Who it's for:** [Target audience - e.g., "Enterprise architects and AI leaders implementing RAG solutions."]
+
+---
+
+## The Framework
+
+[Detailed explanation of your framework - be specific about the components, stages, or elements]
+
+### Component 1: [Name - e.g., "Stage 1: Basic RAG"]
+
+**Definition:** [Clear description]
+
+**Characteristics:**
+- [Key trait 1]
+- [Key trait 2]
+- [Key trait 3]
+
+**Common challenges at this stage:**
+- [Challenge 1]
+- [Challenge 2]
+
+**What success looks like:**
+[Measurable outcomes]
+
+---
+
+### Component 2: [Name - e.g., "Stage 2: Enhanced RAG"]
+
+**Definition:** [Clear description]
+
+**Characteristics:**
+- [Key trait 1]
+- [Key trait 2]
+- [Key trait 3]
+
+**Common challenges at this stage:**
+- [Challenge 1]
+- [Challenge 2]
+
+**What success looks like:**
+[Measurable outcomes]
+
+---
+
+### Component 3: [Name - e.g., "Stage 3: Advanced RAG"]
+
+**Definition:** [Clear description]
+
+**Characteristics:**
+- [Key trait 1]
+- [Key trait 2]
+- [Key trait 3]
+
+**Common challenges at this stage:**
+- [Challenge 1]
+- [Challenge 2]
+
+**What success looks like:**
+[Measurable outcomes]
+
+---
+
+## How to Use This Framework
+
+**Diagnostic questions:**
+1. [Question to determine current stage/position]
+2. [Question to identify gaps]
+3. [Question to prioritize next steps]
+
+**Implementation pathway:**
+1. [Step 1]
+2. [Step 2]
+3. [Step 3]
+
+---
+
+## LinkedIn Post Angle Options
+
+When creating posts about this framework, here are proven angles:
+
+### Angle 1: Framework Introduction
+**Hook:** "Most [target audience] struggle with [problem]. I developed a framework that [solution]."
+
+**Structure:**
+- Introduce the problem
+- Present the framework overview
+- Briefly explain each component
+- Provide diagnostic question
+- CTA: Ask where they are in the framework
+
+**Expected engagement:** [Medium-High for framework lovers]
+
+---
+
+### Angle 2: Deep Dive on One Component
+**Hook:** "[Stage/Component Name] is where most [target audience] get stuck. Here's why..."
+
+**Structure:**
+- Focus on single component in depth
+- Common mistakes at this stage
+- How to progress to next level
+- Real example if available
+- CTA: Ask about their experience at this stage
+
+**Expected engagement:** [High for people at that stage]
+
+---
+
+### Angle 3: Case Study Application
+**Hook:** "We helped [Company/Org Type] move from [Stage A] to [Stage B] in [Time]. Here's how..."
+
+**Structure:**
+- Starting situation (Stage A characteristics)
+- Challenge/tension
+- Intervention using framework
+- Results (Stage B outcomes)
+- Key lesson
+- CTA: Ask what stage they're at
+
+**Expected engagement:** [Very High - specificity + results]
+
+---
+
+### Angle 4: Contrarian Take
+**Hook:** "Everyone talks about [common approach]. But the framework shows that [contrarian insight]."
+
+**Structure:**
+- Challenge conventional wisdom
+- Explain why most approaches fail (using framework lens)
+- Present alternative pathway
+- Evidence from your framework
+- CTA: Ask if they've experienced this
+
+**Expected engagement:** [High if insight is strong]
+
+---
+
+## Visual Assets
+
+**Diagram location:** [Path to visual in /visual-assets/ folder if applicable]
+
+**Visual description:** [Describe the diagram - useful for recreating in posts]
+
+**When to use visuals:**
+- Introduction posts (show full framework)
+- LinkedIn carousel (break down each component)
+- Workshop/webinar materials
+
+---
+
+## Real-World Results
+
+Document actual results from applying this framework:
+
+### Case 1: [Organization/Context]
+- **Starting point:** [Where they were]
+- **Applied framework:** [How]
+- **Outcome:** [Measurable result]
+- **Timeline:** [Duration]
+
+### Case 2: [Organization/Context]
+- **Starting point:** [Where they were]
+- **Applied framework:** [How]
+- **Outcome:** [Measurable result]
+- **Timeline:** [Duration]
+
+### Case 3: [Organization/Context]
+- [Same structure]
+
+**Aggregate impact:**
+[Overall statistics if you have multiple implementations]
+
+---
+
+## Common Misconceptions
+
+What people get wrong about this framework:
+
+1. **Misconception:** [What they think]
+   - **Reality:** [Actual truth]
+   - **Why it matters:** [Implication]
+
+2. **Misconception:** [What they think]
+   - **Reality:** [Actual truth]
+   - **Why it matters:** [Implication]
+
+---
+
+## Evolution of This Framework
+
+**Origin:** [How you developed this - gives credibility]
+
+**Refinements over time:**
+- **Version 1.0:** [Initial version]
+- **Version 2.0:** [What you changed based on real-world application]
+- **Current version:** [Latest insights]
+
+**Future development:**
+[Where you're taking this next]
+
+---
+
+## Integration with Other Frameworks
+
+If this framework connects to or builds on other methodologies:
+
+**Complements:** [Other frameworks it works with]
+**Differs from:** [What makes this unique vs. similar approaches]
+**Can be combined with:** [Synergistic frameworks]
+
+---
+
+## Credibility Markers
+
+When referencing this framework in posts, use these credibility indicators:
+
+- ✅ "Developed over [X] projects with [Y] organizations"
+- ✅ "Validated through [specific results]"
+- ✅ "Based on [research/analysis] of [data set]"
+- ❌ Avoid: "Revolutionary", "Game-changing", other hype
+
+**Authority stance:** [How you position yourself - e.g., "Practitioner sharing what worked, not guru claiming universal truth"]
+
+---
+
+## Update Log
+
+- **[Date]:** Created framework based on [initial observations]
+- **[Date]:** Refined after [new learnings/applications]
+- **[Date]:** Added [new component/insight]