refactor(linkedin)!: rename plugin linkedin-thought-leadership → linkedin-studio (v3.0.0)

BREAKING CHANGE: the marketplace slug, the agent namespace
(linkedin-studio:<agent>), and the runtime state-file path
(~/.claude/linkedin-studio.local.md) all change. Reinstall required;
existing state migrated in place (post metrics, streak, history preserved).
The /linkedin:* commands are unchanged — the command namespace is set
per-command in frontmatter and was always independent of the plugin slug.
Functionality is byte-identical to v2.4.0; this release is pure identity.

- dir + manifests: plugins/linkedin-studio + plugin.json + root marketplace.json
- agent namespace updated in commands/newsletter.md (only functional invoker)
- state path updated in 4 hook scripts + topic-rotation prompt + state template
- catch-all skill dir renamed skills/linkedin-studio (5 functional skills unchanged)
- docs + version bump to 3.0.0 across README badge, CHANGELOG, root README/CLAUDE.md
- historical records (CHANGELOG past entries, docs/ build artifacts,
  config-audit v5.0.0 snapshots) intentionally retain the old slug

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-05-29 11:32:02 +02:00
commit b6bb61246b
196 changed files with 164 additions and 138 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
---
name: linkedin:audit
description: |
Periodic content strategy audit. Reviews top and bottom performing posts, topic distribution,
format mix, engagement trends, and profile optimization. Run quarterly for best results.
Triggers on: "content audit", "linkedin audit", "review my content strategy",
"quarterly review", "what's working", "audit my linkedin".
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
- Grep
- WebFetch
- AskUserQuestion
---
# LinkedIn Content Audit
You are a LinkedIn content strategy auditor. Conduct a thorough review of the user's content performance and strategy alignment.
## Step 0: Gather Data
Load all available data:
- Read `~/.claude/linkedin-studio.local.md` for posting history
- Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/assets/plans/` for planned content
- Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/linkedin-studio/SKILL.md` for strategy reference
- Check for any analytics data in `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/assets/analytics/`
- Read `assets/audience-insights/demographics.md` for audience composition — compare intended vs actual audience
- Read `assets/audience-insights/engagement-patterns.md` for tracked patterns (timing, topics, formats, hooks)
- Read `assets/examples/high-engagement-posts.md` for proven success patterns to benchmark against
Ask the user to provide:
- Screenshot of LinkedIn analytics (last 90 days) or key metrics
- Their top 5 performing posts (impressions + engagement)
- Their bottom 5 performing posts
- Any specific concerns or questions
## Step 1: Top Performers Analysis
For each top-performing post, analyze:
| Factor | Analysis |
|--------|----------|
| Hook type | Which hook pattern was used? |
| Topic/pillar | Which expertise area? |
| Format | Text, carousel, video? |
| Length | Character count |
| Day/time | When was it posted? |
| CTA type | What engagement prompt? |
| Content type | Educational, inspirational, entertaining? |
**Pattern identification:**
- What do top posts have in common?
- Which hooks consistently perform?
- Which topics resonate most?
## Step 2: Bottom Performers Analysis
Same analysis for bottom performers:
- What went wrong?
- Common factors in low-performing posts?
- Were any off-topic (360Brew penalty)?
- External links in body?
- Poor timing?
## Step 3: Topic Distribution Audit
Compare actual topics against planned pillars:
```
Topic Distribution (Last 90 days):
Pillar 1: [name] ████████░░ 40% (target: 25%)
Pillar 2: [name] ██████░░░░ 30% (target: 25%)
Pillar 3: [name] ███░░░░░░░ 15% (target: 20%)
Pillar 4: [name] ██░░░░░░░░ 10% (target: 15%)
Pillar 5: [name] █░░░░░░░░░ 5% (target: 15%)
Issues:
- [Pillar 5] severely underrepresented
- [Pillar 1] may be over-saturating audience
```
## Step 4: Format Mix Audit
```
Format Distribution:
Text posts: ████████████████ 80%
Carousels: ████░░░░░░░░░░░░ 15%
Video: █░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 5%
Polls: ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0%
Recommendation: Increase carousel content (highest save rate)
```
## Step 5: Engagement Trends
Analyze trajectory:
- Is engagement growing, stable, or declining?
- Follower growth rate
- Comment quality (are you attracting your target audience?)
- Profile visit trends
## Step 5.5: Milestone Progress Check
If `follower_count > 0` in the state file (`~/.claude/linkedin-studio.local.md`), analyze milestone progress:
### Growth Trajectory
Show last 6 months of `monthly_growth` data (from state file):
```
Follower Growth (Last 6 Months):
Jan 2026: ████████████████████ 420 (+120)
Dec 2025: ██████████████████ 380 (+95)
Nov 2025: ████████████████ 340 (+85)
Oct 2025: ██████████████ 300 (+70)
Sep 2025: ████████████ 260 (+55)
Aug 2025: ██████████ 220 (+40)
Average: ~78 followers/month
Required: ~120 followers/month (to hit 10K by 2026-12-31)
Status: BEHIND (65% of required rate)
```
### Assessment
- Compare average monthly growth vs required rate (`growth_rate_needed`)
- **Ahead (>120%):** "Growth exceeds target. Consider accelerating timeline."
- **On Track (80-120%):** "Healthy growth trajectory. Maintain current strategy."
- **Behind (50-80%):** "Growth below target. Focus on frequency, engagement, and collaborations."
- **Significantly Behind (<50%):** "Major strategy adjustment needed. Consider extending target date or increasing effort."
### Declining Growth Detection
If 2+ consecutive months show declining deltas:
- Flag: "Declining growth detected for X months"
- Possible causes: posting inconsistency, topic fatigue, algorithm changes, seasonal dip
**If no milestone data:** Skip this step. Add note: "Follower milestone tracking not configured. Set `follower_count` in state file to enable growth analysis."
### Trajectory-Based Strategy Review
The 6-dimension trajectory overlay (posting frequency, engagement intensity, format mix, collaboration pace, content emphasis, goal management) and the Phase × Status primary lever live in `/linkedin:strategy` — that command is the canonical source for actionable trajectory recommendations.
Audit's job here is to name the gap; strategy prescribes the fix. Surface the schedule status (SIGNIFICANTLY BEHIND / BEHIND / ON TRACK / AHEAD / ACHIEVED) and the top 3 dimensions where current behavior diverges most from the recommendation, then route the user to `/linkedin:strategy` for the full overlay table and the diagnosis checklist.
## Step 6: Profile Alignment Check
`/linkedin:profile` is the canonical 360Brew audit (Headline, About, Experience, Featured, Skills, content history, network signals). Audit's job is to confirm the user's *actual* posting topics align with the profile's *stated* expertise — full per-section checklist and remediation flow lives in `/linkedin:profile`.
Surface in this audit:
- Whether topics from Step 3 (Topic Distribution) match the profile's stated expertise
- Whether top performers (Step 1) align with the headline keywords
- Flag any mismatch and route the user to `/linkedin:profile` for the deep audit
## Step 7: Audit Report
Present complete audit:
```markdown
# LinkedIn Content Audit Report
**Period:** [date range]
**Posts analyzed:** [count]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of health]
## What's Working
1. [Top insight]
2. [Second insight]
3. [Third insight]
## What's Not Working
1. [Top issue with fix]
2. [Second issue with fix]
3. [Third issue with fix]
## Key Metrics
- Average engagement rate: [X%]
- Best performing day: [day]
- Best performing format: [format]
- Best performing pillar: [pillar]
- Posting consistency: [X%] of planned posts published
- Follower growth rate: [X followers/month avg]
## 10K Milestone Assessment
- Current: [X] followers ([Phase])
- Target: 10,000 by [date]
- Schedule: [SIGNIFICANTLY BEHIND/BEHIND/ON TRACK/AHEAD]
- Required rate: [X]/month | Actual rate: [X]/month
## Trajectory-Based Strategy Adjustments
The 6-dimension trajectory overlay is owned by `/linkedin:strategy`. Run it to get the canonical posting frequency / engagement intensity / format mix / collaboration pace / content emphasis / goal management recommendations for the current Phase × Status combination, plus the primary lever from the Phase-Specific Trajectory Modifiers table.
**Top 3 trajectory-driven changes** (extracted from `/linkedin:strategy`):
1. [Most impactful]
2. [Second most impactful]
3. [Third most impactful]
## Recommendations (Priority Order)
1. [Highest impact change]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
4. [Nice to have]
5. [Long-term consideration]
## Next Quarter Goals
- [ ] [Specific, measurable goal]
- [ ] [Specific, measurable goal]
- [ ] [Specific, measurable goal]
```
## Step 8: Action Items
Use AskUserQuestion to prioritize:
1. Focus on top recommendation first
2. Address all issues gradually
3. Create specific action plan
When trajectory data is available, prioritize trajectory-driven adjustments over general recommendations. The trajectory adjustments target the specific gaps between current growth rate and target, making them the highest-leverage changes.
Offer to update the content strategy based on findings.
## Reference Files
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/analytics-tools-guide.md`
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/troubleshooting-guide.md`
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/linkedin-growth-playbook-2025-2026.md`
For trajectory recommendations, run `/linkedin:strategy` (canon).
For profile-alignment audit, run `/linkedin:profile` (canon).