diff --git a/plugins/llm-security/agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md b/plugins/llm-security/agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md
index 27cec3f..a38ff92 100644
--- a/plugins/llm-security/agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md
+++ b/plugins/llm-security/agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ server.js:142 — fetch('https://api.example.com/collect', { body: JSON.stringif
 | **Medium** | Meaningful risk, requires attention | Excessive permissions vs. stated purpose, missing input validation on tool args, remote feature flags without disclosure, plaintext tokens in config |
 | **Low** | Informational or best-practice gap | Unlocked dependency versions, missing README documentation, overly broad but not harmful env var access |
 
-**Unified verdict:** `BLOCK` if Critical >= 1 OR score >= 61. `WARNING` if High >= 1 OR score >= 21. Otherwise `ALLOW`.
-**Risk score:** `min((Critical × 25) + (High × 10) + (Medium × 4) + (Low × 1), 100)`.
+**Unified verdict:** `BLOCK` if Critical ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 65. `WARNING` if High ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 15. Otherwise `ALLOW`. (v2 model — severity-dominated, see `scanners/lib/severity.mjs`.)
+**Risk score:** `riskScore(counts)` — severity-dominated, log-scaled per tier. Critical present → 70-95; High only → 40-65; Medium only → 15-35; Low only → 1-11. `info` is scoring-inert.
 **Always include** the `owasp` field (e.g., "LLM01", "LLM03") in every finding for OWASP categorization.
 
 ---
diff --git a/plugins/llm-security/agents/posture-assessor-agent.md b/plugins/llm-security/agents/posture-assessor-agent.md
index 176ec8f..9897604 100644
--- a/plugins/llm-security/agents/posture-assessor-agent.md
+++ b/plugins/llm-security/agents/posture-assessor-agent.md
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ After completing all 10 categories:
 - 3 or more Critical-severity findings from any source
 
 Also compute and display the **risk score** (0-100) and **risk band** alongside the grade.
-Use the formula: `score = min((Critical × 25) + (High × 10) + (Medium × 4) + (Low × 1), 100)`
+Use the v2 model: `score = riskScore(counts)` (severity-dominated, log-scaled per tier — see `scanners/lib/severity.mjs`). Critical present → 70-95; High only → 40-65; Medium only → 15-35; Low only → 1-11. Verdict: critical ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 65 → BLOCK; high ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 15 → WARNING; else ALLOW. `info` is scoring-inert.
 
 ---
 
diff --git a/plugins/llm-security/commands/audit.md b/plugins/llm-security/commands/audit.md
index 81ea2fe..0904c5e 100644
--- a/plugins/llm-security/commands/audit.md
+++ b/plugins/llm-security/commands/audit.md
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ After skill scan, spawn `subagent_type: "llm-security:mcp-scanner-agent"`, `mode
 ## Step 5: Generate Report
 
 Merge posture scanner JSON + agent findings. Use the posture scanner's grade as the baseline.
-Recalculate `risk_score = min(100, critical*25 + high*10 + medium*4 + low*1)` including agent findings.
+Recalculate `risk_score = riskScore(counts)` (severity-dominated v2 model — see `scanners/lib/severity.mjs`) including agent findings.
 
 Output: Risk Dashboard, Executive Summary, 10 Category Sections (use scanner evidence + agent narrative), Summary Table, Action Items (IMMEDIATE → HIGH → MEDIUM).
 
diff --git a/plugins/llm-security/commands/scan.md b/plugins/llm-security/commands/scan.md
index 5179b19..e30b0ed 100644
--- a/plugins/llm-security/commands/scan.md
+++ b/plugins/llm-security/commands/scan.md
@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ Otherwise (local scan — direct mode):
 
 ## Step 5: Aggregate and Report
 
-Combine counts. `risk_score = min(100, critical*25 + high*10 + medium*4 + low*1)`.
-Verdict: critical≥1 OR score≥61 → BLOCK, high≥1 OR score≥21 → WARNING, else ALLOW.
+Combine counts. `risk_score = riskScore(counts)` (severity-dominated v2 model — see `scanners/lib/severity.mjs`).
+Verdict: critical ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 65 → BLOCK; high ≥ 1 OR score ≥ 15 → WARNING; else ALLOW.
 
 Output banner then all findings grouped by severity (critical→info). Each finding:
 `### [SEV] Title` with Category, File:line, OWASP, Evidence, Remediation.
diff --git a/plugins/llm-security/tests/lib/doc-consistency.test.mjs b/plugins/llm-security/tests/lib/doc-consistency.test.mjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ac2d2f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plugins/llm-security/tests/lib/doc-consistency.test.mjs
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+// doc-consistency.test.mjs — Static asserts that prose documentation
+// stays aligned with the v2 risk-scoring model in scanners/lib/severity.mjs.
+//
+// Background: v7.0.0 introduced the severity-dominated v2 risk-score model
+// (BLOCK ≥65, WARNING ≥15) but several prose surfaces (commands/, agents/)
+// continued to emit the v1 formula (`critical*25 + ...`, BLOCK ≥61,
+// WARNING ≥21). v7.1.1 fixed two of them (agents/skill-scanner-agent.md,
+// templates/unified-report.md). Batch B → v7.2.0 closes the trifecta:
+// commands/scan.md, commands/audit.md, agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md.
+//
+// This test pins the closure. If any future edit re-introduces v1 formula
+// tokens in commands/ or agents/, this test fails fast.
+
+import { describe, it } from 'node:test';
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
+import { readdirSync, readFileSync, statSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { join, dirname, resolve } from 'node:path';
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+
+const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
+const PLUGIN_ROOT = resolve(dirname(__filename), '..', '..');
+
+// v1 formula tokens that must NOT appear in commands/ or agents/.
+// These are the patterns the brief's verification step 4 grep checks.
+const V1_TOKENS = [
+  /\bscore\s*[><]?=\s*61\b/,                        // verdict cutoff
+  /\bscore\s*[><]?=\s*21\b/,                        // verdict cutoff
+  /score\s*≥\s*61/,                                 // unicode variant
+  /score\s*≥\s*21/,                                 // unicode variant
+  /critical\s*\*\s*25/,                             // formula multiplier
+  /Critical\s*[×x]\s*25/,                           // formula multiplier (table form)
+  /min\(\s*100\s*,\s*critical\s*\*\s*25/i,          // full v1 formula prefix
+];
+
+function* walkMarkdown(dir) {
+  for (const entry of readdirSync(dir)) {
+    const full = join(dir, entry);
+    const stat = statSync(full);
+    if (stat.isDirectory()) {
+      yield* walkMarkdown(full);
+    } else if (entry.endsWith('.md')) {
+      yield full;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+describe('doc-consistency — v1 risk-formula tokens are absent from prose', () => {
+  const COMMANDS_DIR = join(PLUGIN_ROOT, 'commands');
+  const AGENTS_DIR = join(PLUGIN_ROOT, 'agents');
+
+  for (const dir of [COMMANDS_DIR, AGENTS_DIR]) {
+    for (const file of walkMarkdown(dir)) {
+      const rel = file.replace(PLUGIN_ROOT + '/', '');
+      it(`${rel} contains no v1 formula tokens`, () => {
+        const content = readFileSync(file, 'utf-8');
+        for (const token of V1_TOKENS) {
+          assert.equal(
+            token.test(content),
+            false,
+            `${rel} still contains v1 formula token matching ${token}. ` +
+              `v7.2.0 unified all command/agent prose to v2 (BLOCK ≥65, WARNING ≥15). ` +
+              `If a new file legitimately needs to reference v1 (e.g. CHANGELOG history), ` +
+              `move that file out of commands/ or agents/.`,
+          );
+        }
+      });
+    }
+  }
+});
+
+describe('doc-consistency — v2 cutoffs are documented in unified prose', () => {
+  it('commands/scan.md mentions the v2 BLOCK cutoff (≥ 65)', () => {
+    const content = readFileSync(join(PLUGIN_ROOT, 'commands', 'scan.md'), 'utf-8');
+    assert.match(content, /score\s*[≥>=]+\s*65/);
+  });
+
+  it('commands/audit.md references riskScore() (v2 helper)', () => {
+    const content = readFileSync(join(PLUGIN_ROOT, 'commands', 'audit.md'), 'utf-8');
+    assert.match(content, /riskScore/);
+  });
+
+  it('agents/mcp-scanner-agent.md mentions the v2 BLOCK cutoff (≥ 65)', () => {
+    const content = readFileSync(join(PLUGIN_ROOT, 'agents', 'mcp-scanner-agent.md'), 'utf-8');
+    assert.match(content, /score\s*[≥>=]+\s*65/);
+  });
+});