test(humanizer): replace title-string assertions with ID-based checks
Wave 2 / Step 4 of v5.1.0 plain-language UX humanizer rollout. Re-anchors 34 title-string assertions across 4 test files so they survive Wave 3's title/description/recommendation rewriting at the CLI layer. Anchoring strategy per scanner: - GAP findings: scanner + category + recommendation substring (humanizer preserves stable identifiers like CLAUDE.md, .mcp.json, hook in rec). Hardcoded CA-GAP-NNN IDs for positive checks. - HKV findings: scanner + evidence regex (evidence preserved verbatim). - SET findings: scanner + evidence regex (evidence preserved verbatim). - PLH findings: scanner + hardcoded CA-PLH-NNN IDs (no evidence on most PLH findings, so ID is the only stable anchor for specific cases; negative checks use scanner + title-substring spanning raw + humanized). Per docs/v5.1.0-test-audit.md classification: only (b) WILL BREAK assertions modified. (a) shape-only assertions (error-message formatting, pure existence checks) untouched. tests/lib/output.test.mjs and tests/lib/diff-engine.test.mjs and tests/scanners/fix-engine.test.mjs unchanged (synthetic test inputs, not scanner output). Test count unchanged: 689/689 pass. IDs harvested via deterministic runtime dump per fixture (resetCounter + scan).
This commit is contained in:
parent
b69fdea883
commit
dff278f02a
4 changed files with 73 additions and 33 deletions
|
|
@ -46,32 +46,37 @@ describe('SET scanner — broken project', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('detects unknown settings key', () => {
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.title === 'Unknown settings key');
|
||||
// CA-SET-001 in broken-project, evidence='unknownKey123'.
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.scanner === 'SET' && /unknownKey123/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(found, 'Should detect unknownKey123');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('detects deprecated key (includeCoAuthoredBy)', () => {
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.title === 'Deprecated settings key');
|
||||
// CA-SET-002 in broken-project, evidence='includeCoAuthoredBy: true'.
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.scanner === 'SET' && /includeCoAuthoredBy/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(found, 'Should detect includeCoAuthoredBy');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('detects type mismatch (alwaysThinkingEnabled as string)', () => {
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.title === 'Type mismatch in settings');
|
||||
// CA-SET-003 in broken-project, evidence='alwaysThinkingEnabled: "yes" (string)'.
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.scanner === 'SET' && /alwaysThinkingEnabled/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(found, 'Should detect boolean/string mismatch');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('detects invalid effortLevel value', () => {
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.title === 'Invalid effortLevel value');
|
||||
// CA-SET-004 in broken-project, evidence='effortLevel: "turbo"'.
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.scanner === 'SET' && /effortLevel:\s*"turbo"/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(found, 'Should detect effortLevel "turbo"');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('detects hooks as array', () => {
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.title.includes('array instead of object'));
|
||||
// CA-SET-006 in broken-project, evidence='"hooks": [...]'.
|
||||
const found = result.findings.some(f => f.scanner === 'SET' && /"hooks":\s*\[/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(found, 'Should detect hooks array format');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('marks hooks-as-array as critical', () => {
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(f => f.title.includes('array instead of object'));
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(x => x.scanner === 'SET' && /"hooks":\s*\[/.test(x.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(f?.severity, 'critical');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
@ -82,8 +87,10 @@ describe('SET scanner — additionalDirectories (v5 M6)', () => {
|
|||
const path = resolve(FIXTURES, 'additional-dirs-ok');
|
||||
const discovery = await discoverConfigFiles(path);
|
||||
const result = await scan(path, discovery);
|
||||
// SET findings preserve evidence verbatim; an unknown-key finding for additionalDirectories
|
||||
// would carry "additionalDirectories" in evidence regardless of humanizer rewriting the title.
|
||||
const unknown = result.findings.find(f =>
|
||||
f.title === 'Unknown settings key' && /additionalDirectories/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
f.scanner === 'SET' && /additionalDirectories/.test(f.evidence || ''));
|
||||
assert.equal(unknown, undefined,
|
||||
'additionalDirectories should be in KNOWN_KEYS');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,9 +100,11 @@ describe('SET scanner — additionalDirectories (v5 M6)', () => {
|
|||
const path = resolve(FIXTURES, 'additional-dirs-ok');
|
||||
const discovery = await discoverConfigFiles(path);
|
||||
const result = await scan(path, discovery);
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(x => /additionalDirectories/i.test(x.title || ''));
|
||||
// The additionalDirectories threshold finding writes paths into evidence (e.g., "~/work/repo-a", ...).
|
||||
// additional-dirs-ok is below threshold, so no SET finding fires at all.
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(x => x.scanner === 'SET');
|
||||
assert.equal(f, undefined,
|
||||
`expected no additionalDirectories threshold finding for 2 entries, got: ${f?.title}`);
|
||||
`expected no SET findings for 2 entries, got id=${f?.id}`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('flags > 2 entries as low finding', async () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -103,8 +112,9 @@ describe('SET scanner — additionalDirectories (v5 M6)', () => {
|
|||
const path = resolve(FIXTURES, 'additional-dirs-many');
|
||||
const discovery = await discoverConfigFiles(path);
|
||||
const result = await scan(path, discovery);
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(x => /additionalDirectories/i.test(x.title || ''));
|
||||
assert.ok(f, `expected additionalDirectories threshold finding; got: ${result.findings.map(x => x.title).join(' | ')}`);
|
||||
// CA-SET-001 in additional-dirs-many = the additionalDirectories threshold finding.
|
||||
const f = result.findings.find(x => x.scanner === 'SET' && x.id === 'CA-SET-001');
|
||||
assert.ok(f, `expected additionalDirectories threshold finding; got: ${result.findings.map(x => x.id).join(' | ')}`);
|
||||
assert.equal(f.severity, 'low', `expected low severity, got ${f.severity}`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue