open/ktg-plugin-marketplace
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity Actions

feat(linkedin-studio): short-form de-AI gate via differentiation-checker + voice-guardian

Browse source 
Wire the orphan differentiation-checker (#10) into the five short-form
creation commands (post/quick/react/carousel/video) as a De-AI /
Differentiation Gate at each command's quality-check step: confirm the
LinkedIn-named substance signals (personal substance, original thinking,
concrete specifics, genuine voice) + a soft engagement-bait check, and
delegate an originality pass to linkedin-studio:differentiation-checker
when the angle risks commodity content. Add Task to allowed-tools in
quick/react/carousel (post/video already had it from Step 13).

Extend (not duplicate) hooks/prompts/voice-guardian.md's AI-pattern
section with the same named signals from research/01 D8 + research/03 D4.
Runtime-loaded prompt — no compile-hooks.py, no hooks.json change
(verified: compile-hooks --check reports no drift).

Test: new hooks/scripts/__tests__/linkedin-content-filter.test.mjs pins
the content/non-content boundary the gate is scoped by (14 tests).
Full hook suite 76/76, structure lint 61/61.

Plan Step 14 (Wave 4 S2). Counts unchanged (26 commands / 19 agents).
[skip-docs]: tre-doc + version bump deferred to Step 21 per remediation plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-05-30 02:31:41 +02:00
commit e2ed3eb0aa
7 changed files with 131 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
plugins/linkedin-studio/commands/react.md
View file

@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ allowed-tools:
- WebFetch
- Bash
- AskUserQuestion
- Task
---
# React to External Content — URL-to-Post Pipeline
@ -126,6 +127,12 @@ Verify against quality rules:
- [ ] Topic aligns with expertise areas
- [ ] CTA invites discussion, not just "What do you think?"
### De-AI / Differentiation Gate
A reaction still has to add something only you can. Confirm the draft carries the signals LinkedIn named — **personal substance, original thinking, concrete specifics, genuine voice** — and uses no mechanical-response engagement bait ("Comment YES", "Like for Part 2"); a genuine question is fine. (The voice-guardian hook scores this on save.)
If your take echoes the source instead of extending it — commodity reaction — delegate an originality pass to the `differentiation-checker` agent: invoke it via `Task` with `subagent_type: linkedin-studio:differentiation-checker` (foreground, from this command layer), then sharpen the angle before presenting.
## Step 7: Present Draft
Show: