feat(humanizer): update agent system prompts [skip-docs]
Wave 5 Step 16 — final wave step. Threads humanizer-aware rendering
rules through the three agent prompts that produce user-facing output,
and adds a shape test that locks the structure.
- agents/analyzer-agent.md: documents the humanizer envelope shape
(userImpactCategory, userActionLanguage, relevanceContext) in the
Input section; new "Humanizer-aware rendering rules" subsection
instructs the agent to: render humanized title/description/
recommendation verbatim, group findings by userImpactCategory, lead
each line with userActionLanguage, surface relevanceContext when
not affects-everyone, and skip jargon-translation subroutines.
--raw fallback documented (v5.0.0 verbatim severity prefiks).
- agents/planner-agent.md: documents the same vocabulary; instructs
the planner to consume humanized fields from the analysis report,
preserve titles verbatim, and order actions by both dependencies
AND userActionLanguage urgency. Translation duties explicitly
removed from the plan.
- agents/feature-gap-agent.md: replaces the inline t1/t2/t3/t4
tier-to-prose section ladder with userActionLanguage-driven
groupings ("Fix soon" → High Impact, "Fix when convenient" →
Worth Considering, "Optional cleanup"/"FYI" → Explore When Ready);
instructs skipping findings whose relevanceContext is
test-fixture-no-impact; --raw fallback documented.
tests/agents/agent-prompt-shape.test.mjs (new, +6 tests, 786 → 792):
- structural: humanized field reference + frontmatter preserved
- per-agent anchors: analyzer groups by userImpactCategory; planner
orders by userActionLanguage; feature-gap references
test-fixture-no-impact
- global: no "explain what {jargon} means" / "translate jargon" /
"jargon-translation duty" prose anywhere
Self-audit: Grade A unchanged (config 97/100, plugin 100/100).
This commit is contained in:
parent
347d4a2c4c
commit
ec4ac3e6d1
4 changed files with 136 additions and 27 deletions
|
|
@ -25,15 +25,26 @@ You will receive:
|
|||
1. Session ID
|
||||
2. Analysis report: `~/.claude/config-audit/sessions/{session-id}/analysis-report.md`
|
||||
3. Interview results: `~/.claude/config-audit/sessions/{session-id}/interview.md` (optional)
|
||||
4. Mode flag — `$RAW_FLAG`. When empty (default), the analysis report uses humanized vocabulary: each finding has been grouped by `userImpactCategory` and led with `userActionLanguage`. When `--raw`, the report is v5.0.0 verbatim severity prefiks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Humanizer-aware planning rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Consume humanized fields from the analysis report.** The analyzer-agent has already grouped findings by `userImpactCategory` ("Configuration mistake", "Conflict", "Wasted tokens", "Missed opportunity", "Dead config") and led each line with `userActionLanguage` ("Fix this now", "Fix soon", "Fix when convenient", "Optional cleanup", "FYI"). Carry that vocabulary forward into the action plan — do not re-derive severity-to-prose mappings.
|
||||
- **Render finding titles and recommendations verbatim** as they appear in the analysis report. The humanizer owns the plain-language vocabulary; rephrasing introduces drift between report and plan.
|
||||
- **Order actions by `userActionLanguage` urgency**, not by raw severity. "Fix this now" + "Fix soon" precede "Fix when convenient" precede "Optional cleanup" precede "FYI".
|
||||
- **Surface `relevanceContext`** when an action only affects the user's machine or only touches test fixtures — these warrant different escalation paths.
|
||||
- **Do not perform translation duties in the action plan.** No "what this means in plain English" sections. The humanizer handles that upstream; if a finding's prose still reads like jargon, that's a data gap to flag, not a translation to invent.
|
||||
|
||||
In `--raw` mode, the analysis report is v5.0.0 verbatim — fall back to severity-based prioritization and surface raw scanner titles. Flag in the plan header that the plan was generated from unhumanized analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Load inputs**: Read analysis and interview (if exists)
|
||||
2. **Generate actions**: Create action items for each finding
|
||||
1. **Load inputs**: Use the Read tool on the analysis report and interview (if exists)
|
||||
2. **Generate actions**: Create action items for each finding, preserving humanized titles
|
||||
3. **Assess risk**: Evaluate risk level per action
|
||||
4. **Order by dependencies**: Ensure correct execution order
|
||||
4. **Order by dependencies AND `userActionLanguage`**: dependency-correct AND urgency-correct
|
||||
5. **Create rollback plans**: Define how to undo each action
|
||||
6. **Write action plan**: Output comprehensive plan
|
||||
6. **Write action plan**: Output comprehensive plan grouped by `userImpactCategory`
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Categories
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue