# Fact-Checker Fasit Fixture Three reference claims with known ground truth, used to sanity-check the `fact-checker` agent. Each case states the claim, the **fasit** (the correct answer + why), and the expected risk verdict. - 🟒 = verified true against a primary/credible source - πŸ”΄ = contradicted by evidence (false), or a high-risk claim asserted without support - 🟑 = unverifiable from available sources β€” flagged, never guessed This file is a *fasit*, not a test harness. The structural lint lives in `agents/__tests__/fact-checker-fixture.test.mjs`. Whether the agent's live output actually reproduces these verdicts is `[GATE]`/`[OPERATØR]` β€” it is not self-certified. Each case block below carries exactly one verdict emoji (in its **Verdict** field); the prose deliberately avoids emoji so the structural lint can read a single, unambiguous verdict per case. --- ## Case 1 β€” verifiable true - **Claim:** The EU AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024. - **Verdict:** 🟒 - **Fasit:** True. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 was published in the Official Journal on 12 July 2024 and entered into force 20 days later, on 1 August 2024. This is confirmable against the primary source (EUR-Lex) and the European Commission's own communications. A correct agent run returns the verified verdict with a primary-source citation. ## Case 2 β€” verifiable false - **Claim:** GPT-4 was developed and released by Anthropic. - **Verdict:** πŸ”΄ - **Fasit:** False. GPT-4 was released by OpenAI (March 2023). Anthropic develops the Claude model family. The claim is contradicted by both vendors' primary documentation. A correct agent run returns the high-risk verdict and names the contradicting source β€” it must not soften a contradicted claim to the unverified tier. ## Case 3 β€” unverifiable - **Claim:** A Norwegian public-sector agency cut its case-handling time by exactly 37% in Q3 2025 after deploying an internal AI assistant. - **Verdict:** 🟑 - **Fasit:** Unverifiable. No named agency, no published report, and no primary source exists for this precise figure; an internal operational metric of this kind is not independently confirmable from open sources. A correct agent run returns the unverified verdict and states explicitly that the claim cannot be verified β€” it must not fill the gap by inventing a plausible source or promoting the claim to the verified tier.