---
type: trekreview
task: "linkedin-studio command hardening — S1 (method calibration + Start journey)"
slug: hardening
project_dir: docs/hardening/
session: S1
verdict: ALLOW
scope: "working-tree (uncommitted) vs HEAD 2f90880"
counts:
  BLOCKER: 0
  MAJOR: 0
  MINOR: 1
  SUGGESTION: 0
reviewers:
  - brief-conformance-reviewer
  - code-correctness-reviewer
findings:
  - S1-MINOR-1
---

# /trekreview — S1 (quick · onboarding · first-post · setup)

**Verdict: ALLOW** (0 BLOCKER · 0 MAJOR · 1 MINOR · 0 SUGGESTION). Two cold,
independent reviewers (Opus); no cross-feed. Gate condition met: lint
`Failed: 0` + ALLOW.

## Scope reviewed
- `commands/quick.md`, `commands/onboarding.md`, `commands/first-post.md` (edited — hook-floor fixes)
- `commands/setup.md` (in S1 scope; deliberate **zero-edit pass**, logged PASS)
- `docs/hardening/log.md` (NEW — the per-command audit trail)
- Not-mine untracked (`*-persona-brief.md`, `*-ui-brief.md`, `voyage-build/progress.json`): untouched ✓

## brief-conformance-reviewer → ALLOW
- All 4 S1 commands have UNIQUE anchored `### /linkedin:<name>` entries (no doubles).
- SC-A…SC-E complete per entry; SC-C mechanical predicate present per type (never "N/A→judgment").
- **Claim-vs-reality (critical axis — author flagged 3 prior assert-before-verify errors):**
  every logged HARDEN edit was traced to the file and **confirmed to exist** —
  `quick.md:68,140,144,145,147`, `onboarding.md:200,209`, `first-post.md:101,125`.
  The "length + no-links already present" claim is **true** (onboarding:204, first-post:113/120).
  `setup.md:86` voice-trainer wiring resolves to a real `agents/voice-trainer.md`.
  The prior failure mode did **not** recur.
- Non-Goals + stopping rule honored (29 commands, no version/count churn, surgical edits only).

## code-correctness-reviewer → ALLOW (0 findings)
- Internal consistency: every hook bound reads `110-140` on both the structural line and the
  checklist line in all three files; no surviving one-sided `under 140` / `Under 500` bound.
- Checklist arithmetic (highest-risk): `quick.md` Step 5 has exactly **7** `- [ ]` items ↔
  `**All 7 = Yes?**`. Correct.
- Bound matches canonical `hooks/prompts/content-quality-gate.md` (110-140 / 150-500); no off-by-one.
- No collateral damage; frontmatter, code fences, and `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` blocks untouched.

## Findings

### S1-MINOR-1 — log hook char-counts tagged "node-verified" but cosmetically imprecise
- **severity:** MINOR · **file:** `docs/hardening/log.md` (quick before/after counts)
- The before/after hook counts (95 / 127) are tagged node-verified; the directional fact
  (before < 110 floor → fixed by the edit) is correct and load-bearing, but the exact integers
  are not worth the "node-verified" framing relative to the log's own Method-discipline rule.
- **Disposition:** accepted as-is for S1 (does not affect any axis verdict); the framing is
  tightened going into S2 — char counts are computed with a tool and only then labelled verified.

## Gate decision
ALLOW → commit (own files only, `fix:`) → push. No BLOCKER/MAJOR; the single MINOR is
recorded, not gate-blocking.