# Persona-Reviewer Fasit Fixture

One reader persona, one sample draft, the six judging axes, and the two review
modes — used to sanity-check the `persona-reviewer` agent. This is a *fasit*,
not a test harness. The structural lint lives in
`agents/__tests__/persona-reviewer-fixture.test.mjs`. Whether the agent's live
flags actually match the directions below is `[GATE]`/`[OPERATØR]` — it is not
self-certified here.

**The jury judges; the editor writes.** Every expected output in this fixture is
**direction, not rewritten copy**. A correct agent run hands back flags and a
verdict — never edited text.

---

## Persona under review (primær)

Drawn from `config/personas.template.md` — the primær Linjeleder. Field keys are
lowercase to match the library contract.

- **rolle** — Mellomleder med fag- og personalansvar i offentlig virksomhet;
  skal beslutte om og hvordan AI tas i bruk i egen enhet, uten dyp teknisk
  bakgrunn.
- **avkobler** — Teknisk dypdykk uten «hva betyr dette for meg og mine»;
  frykt-retorikk; abstrakt policy; språk som forutsetter at hen kan koden.
- **overbeviser** — Konkrete eksempler fra arbeidshverdagen, et klart ansvars- og
  dømmekraftsbilde, og en leder-takeaway hen kan handle på allerede i morgen.
- **ekspertise** — Lav-til-middels teknisk; høy på ledelse og forvaltning.
  Trenger oversettelse, ikke nedlatenhet.
- **sjargong** — Lav toleranse for teknisk sjargong; setter pris på presise,
  hverdagsnære formuleringer.

> Primær trumfer: a primær NO is not accepted — the text is revised until this
> reader reaches a clean JA. A sekundær NO from a role or expertise ceiling is a
> SIGNAL the gate works, not a defect.

---

## Sample-tekst

The draft excerpt this persona reads, read-only. Deliberately mixed: a workable
human angle ("you don't outsource judgment") buried under one wall of jargon —
exactly the case where the jury should flag direction without touching the copy.

> Transformatorarkitekturen vår utnytter selvoppmerksomhets-mekanismer over en
> 175-milliarders parametermodell for å maksimere inferens-gjennomstrømning på
> tvers av distribuerte GPU-clustere. Men det egentlige poenget er enklere: en
> språkmodell tar ikke beslutningen for deg. Den foreslår — du svarer for
> resultatet. Dømmekraften kan ikke settes ut. Spørsmålet er ikke om verktøyet
> er smart nok, men om du fortsatt eier valget når det teller.

---

## The six axes

The persona-reviewer judges the sample on exactly six axes and returns **at most
five flags** as direction (the sixth that passes cleanest is simply not flagged):

1. **Krok** — does the hook hold for THIS reader in the first two lines? Here:
   IKKE — the opening jargon wall ("transformatorarkitektur… inferens-
   gjennomstrømning") hits `avkobler` head-on; the linjeleder stops reading
   before the real point.
2. **Resonans** — does the central point land for this reader? DELVIS — the
   "judgment can't be outsourced" core is exactly their concern, but it arrives
   too late to land.
3. **Tone** — right for this reader (no condescension, no fear-rhetoric)? LØST —
   tone is respectful and non-alarmist once past the opening.
4. **Troverdighet** — does the reader believe it? DELVIS — the closing claim is
   credible but abstract; no lived example from a leader's workday to anchor it.
5. **Leder-takeaway** — one concrete thing this reader can act on tomorrow?
   IKKE — there is an insight but no action the linjeleder can take in their
   own unit.
6. **Lengde/driv** — does it keep moving or sag? DELVIS — the front half drags
   under the jargon; the back half drives well.

Each flag is **direction**, not a rewrite: "the hook hits `avkobler` — open on
the decision the leader owns" is correct; supplying the new opening line is not.

---

## The two modes

Both modes run the same persona but differ in scope and output.

### Resonans-modus (before lock)

Runs at the newsletter pipeline's pre-lock resonance sweep. Judges all six axes
and returns ≤5 flags as direction, each tracked **LØST / DELVIS / IKKE**. The
primær must reach a clean JA before the draft is locked. For this sample, the
primær verdict is **NEI** (Krok + Leder-takeaway both IKKE) → REWORK, with the
two IKKE flags as the priority directions.

### Konverter-modus (after lock)

Runs at the post-lock conversion sweep. Judges the **hook only**, binary:
«would YOU click?» **JA / NEI**. No axis scoring, no copy — just the click
verdict and a single reason. For this sample's current hook the verdict is
**NEI** — "I'd scroll past; the first line is machinery, not me."

---

## Convergence loop

Re-run per persona until the primær returns a clean JA. Each flag is re-judged
LØST / DELVIS / IKKE against the editor's revision. The jury never writes the
fix — it only re-judges whether the revision now lands.