ktg-plugin-marketplace/scripts/build-rollup-register.test.mjs

// Tests for the state roll-up register builder (build-rollup-register.mjs).
// Style mirrors check-okf-parity.test.mjs / check-versions.test.mjs: node:test,
// pure-function core, zero npm deps. The CLI shell (filesystem glob over ~/repos)
// is NOT unit-tested here — only the pure builder core the contract lives in.
//
// Contract source (ratified): ~/.claude/coord/register.md — two outputs, three
// builder modes, V4 public-safety gate, V5 drift-warn, closed 7-token status vocab.
// Axes are catalog-owned; this file encodes them as fixtures.
//
// The em-dash (U+2014) is written as '—' throughout to keep the source ASCII-clean
// and to make the V4 "no em-dash in carrier" axis unambiguous.
import { test } from 'node:test';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
import { join } from 'node:path';
import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
import {
  STATUS_VOCAB,
  parseMarkerLine,
  parseCarrierLine,
  validateCarrier,
  computeDrift,
  buildRegister,
  extractMarkers,
  discoverRepos,
} from './build-rollup-register.mjs';

const EMDASH = '—';

// --- Status vocabulary: the closed 7-token set (register.md "Status-vokabular") ---
test('STATUS_VOCAB is exactly the closed 7-token set; "active" is dropped', () => {
  assert.deepEqual(
    [...STATUS_VOCAB].sort(),
    ['blocked', 'deferred', 'done', 'in-progress', 'not-applicable', 'partial', 'planned'].sort(),
  );
  assert.ok(!STATUS_VOCAB.includes('active'), '"active" was folded into in-progress and is invalid');
});

// --- parseMarkerLine: Output A source (topic: status — prose) ---
test('parseMarkerLine: parses "topic: status — prose" from a STATE marker', () => {
  const line = `llm-ingestion-okf: planned ${EMDASH} STEG 3 levert, STEG 4 neste`;
  assert.deepEqual(parseMarkerLine(line), {
    topic: 'llm-ingestion-okf',
    status: 'planned',
    prose: 'STEG 3 levert, STEG 4 neste',
  });
});

test('parseMarkerLine: a status-only marker (no prose) parses with empty prose', () => {
  assert.deepEqual(parseMarkerLine('some-topic: done'), {
    topic: 'some-topic',
    status: 'done',
    prose: '',
  });
});

test('parseMarkerLine: unknown status token -> null (not a marker line)', () => {
  assert.equal(parseMarkerLine(`topic: active ${EMDASH} folded away`), null);
  assert.equal(parseMarkerLine(`# STATE ${EMDASH} title heading`), null);
  assert.equal(parseMarkerLine('just some prose without a marker'), null);
});

// --- parseCarrierLine: Output B source (topic: status ALONE) ---
test('parseCarrierLine: parses a bare "topic: status" carrier line', () => {
  assert.deepEqual(parseCarrierLine('llm-ingestion-guard: planned'), {
    topic: 'llm-ingestion-guard',
    status: 'planned',
  });
});

test('parseCarrierLine: rejects anything beyond the bare token (prose/em-dash/unknown)', () => {
  assert.equal(parseCarrierLine(`topic: planned ${EMDASH} prose`), null, 'em-dash + prose is not a carrier line');
  assert.equal(parseCarrierLine('topic: planned extra words'), null, 'trailing prose is not a carrier line');
  assert.equal(parseCarrierLine('topic: active'), null, 'unknown token is malformed');
});

// --- V4 public-safety gate: validateCarrier rejects prose / em-dash / unknown ---
test('V4: a clean carrier (bare topic: token lines) validates ok', () => {
  const text = 'llm-ingestion-guard: planned\nllm-ingestion-okf: not-applicable\n';
  const r = validateCarrier(text);
  assert.equal(r.ok, true);
  assert.deepEqual(r.violations, []);
  assert.deepEqual(r.entries, [
    { topic: 'llm-ingestion-guard', status: 'planned' },
    { topic: 'llm-ingestion-okf', status: 'not-applicable' },
  ]);
});

test('V4: blank lines are tolerated, not violations', () => {
  const r = validateCarrier('\nllm-ingestion-guard: planned\n\n');
  assert.equal(r.ok, true);
  assert.equal(r.entries.length, 1);
});

test('V4: em-dash in a carrier line is a violation (the core public-safety axis)', () => {
  const r = validateCarrier(`topic: planned ${EMDASH} leaked prose`);
  assert.equal(r.ok, false);
  assert.equal(r.violations.length, 1);
  assert.equal(r.violations[0].reason, 'em-dash');
  assert.equal(r.violations[0].lineNo, 1);
});

test('V4: prose after a valid token (no em-dash) is still a violation', () => {
  const r = validateCarrier('topic: planned some trailing prose');
  assert.equal(r.ok, false);
  assert.equal(r.violations[0].reason, 'prose-after-token');
});

test('V4: an unknown status token is a violation', () => {
  const r = validateCarrier('topic: active');
  assert.equal(r.ok, false);
  assert.equal(r.violations[0].reason, 'unknown-status');
});

test('V4: a structurally malformed line (no "topic: status") is a violation', () => {
  const r = validateCarrier('this is not a marker at all');
  assert.equal(r.ok, false);
  assert.equal(r.violations[0].reason, 'malformed');
});

test('V4: reports every offending line, not just the first', () => {
  const text = `a: planned\nb: active\nc: done ${EMDASH} x\n`;
  const r = validateCarrier(text);
  assert.equal(r.ok, false);
  assert.deepEqual(r.violations.map((v) => v.lineNo), [2, 3]);
  assert.deepEqual(r.violations.map((v) => v.reason), ['unknown-status', 'em-dash']);
});

// --- V5 drift-warn: STATE status != carrier status -> warn, STATE wins ---
test('V5: agreeing topics produce no drift warning', () => {
  const markers = [{ topic: 't', status: 'planned' }];
  const carrier = [{ topic: 't', status: 'planned' }];
  assert.deepEqual(computeDrift(markers, carrier), []);
});

test('V5: disagreeing topic yields a drift warning carrying both sides', () => {
  const markers = [{ topic: 't', status: 'done' }];
  const carrier = [{ topic: 't', status: 'in-progress' }];
  assert.deepEqual(computeDrift(markers, carrier), [
    { topic: 't', stateStatus: 'done', carrierStatus: 'in-progress' },
  ]);
});

test('V5: a carrier topic absent from STATE is not a drift (only shared topics compared)', () => {
  const markers = [{ topic: 'a', status: 'done' }];
  const carrier = [{ topic: 'b', status: 'planned' }];
  assert.deepEqual(computeDrift(markers, carrier), []);
});

// --- buildRegister: three-mode assembly (register.md "Tre builder-moduser") ---
function repo(name, markers, carrier, carrierMode) {
  return { name, markers, carrier, carrierMode };
}

test('mode "absent": repo has no carrier -> omitted from Output B, present in Output A', () => {
  const repos = [repo('catalog', [{ topic: 'x', status: 'planned', prose: 'p' }], null, 'absent')];
  const { outputB, outputA } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.equal(outputB.length, 0, 'absent repo contributes nothing to public index B');
  assert.equal(outputA.length, 1, 'but A (local) still covers it');
  assert.deepEqual(outputA[0], { repo: 'catalog', topic: 'x', status: 'planned', prose: 'p' });
});

test('mode "committed": a valid carrier projects into Output B (STATE-authoritative status)', () => {
  const repos = [
    repo(
      'guard',
      [{ topic: 'llm-ingestion-guard', status: 'planned', prose: 'B6 detail' }],
      'llm-ingestion-guard: planned\n',
      'committed',
    ),
  ];
  const { outputB } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.deepEqual(outputB, ['llm-ingestion-guard: planned']);
});

test('mode "private": private side-channel carrier stays out of Output B', () => {
  const repos = [
    repo(
      'secret',
      [{ topic: 'z', status: 'in-progress', prose: 'p' }],
      'z: in-progress\n',
      'private',
    ),
  ];
  const { outputB, outputA } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.equal(outputB.length, 0, 'private-mode carrier never reaches the public index');
  assert.equal(outputA.length, 1, 'but it is present in the local A index');
});

test('buildRegister: Output B projects STATE status on drift (STATE wins) and records the drift', () => {
  const repos = [
    repo(
      'r',
      [{ topic: 't', status: 'done', prose: 'finished' }],
      't: in-progress\n', // carrier drifted behind STATE
      'committed',
    ),
  ];
  const { outputB, drift } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.deepEqual(outputB, ['t: done'], 'STATE status wins in the projection, not the stale carrier');
  assert.deepEqual(drift, [{ repo: 'r', topic: 't', stateStatus: 'done', carrierStatus: 'in-progress' }]);
});

test('buildRegister: a V4-violating committed carrier is blocked from B and its violation reported', () => {
  const repos = [
    repo(
      'bad',
      [{ topic: 't', status: 'planned', prose: 'p' }],
      `t: planned ${EMDASH} leaked`,
      'committed',
    ),
  ];
  const { outputB, violations } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.equal(outputB.length, 0, 'a repo whose carrier fails V4 must not pollute the public index');
  assert.equal(violations.length, 1);
  assert.equal(violations[0].repo, 'bad');
  assert.equal(violations[0].reason, 'em-dash');
});

test('buildRegister: Output B is sorted and deterministic across repos', () => {
  const repos = [
    repo('b', [{ topic: 'zeta', status: 'done', prose: 'p' }], 'zeta: done\n', 'committed'),
    repo('a', [{ topic: 'alpha', status: 'planned', prose: 'p' }], 'alpha: planned\n', 'committed'),
  ];
  const { outputB } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.deepEqual(outputB, ['alpha: planned', 'zeta: done'], 'stable sort so the public index has no spurious diffs');
});

// --- V6 marker-loss gate: a marker ATTEMPT that fails to parse must be reported ---
// parseMarkerLine returns null for two different facts ("not a marker" / "a marker that
// failed to parse"), so a malformed marker used to vanish with exit 0. V6 splits them.
test('V6: a well-formed marker extracts with no loss reported', () => {
  const text = `# STATE\n\nsome-topic: planned ${EMDASH} prose after the em-dash\n`;
  const { markers, losses } = extractMarkers(text);
  assert.equal(markers.length, 1);
  assert.deepEqual(losses, [], 'a parseable marker is not a loss');
});

test('V6: an ASCII "--" separator loses the marker today -> reported with line number', () => {
  // The measured shape: two STATE.md files in ~/repos wrote "--" where the grammar
  // requires the em-dash, and both vanished silently before this gate existed. The
  // fixture is SYNTHETIC on purpose — marker prose is Output-A material (LOCAL-ONLY),
  // so quoting a real one verbatim into this public repo would be the same
  // durability-vs-publicity conflation the builder header warns about.
  const text = '# STATE\n\nsome-topic: done -- prose after an ASCII separator\n';
  const { markers, losses } = extractMarkers(text);
  assert.equal(markers.length, 0, 'the line still does not parse as a marker');
  assert.equal(losses.length, 1, 'but it must no longer disappear silently');
  assert.equal(losses[0].lineNo, 3, 'the operator needs the line number to fix it');
  assert.match(losses[0].line, /some-topic: done/);
});

test('V6: prose and unknown status tokens are NOT losses (no false positives)', () => {
  const text = [
    'just some prose without a marker',
    `topic: active ${EMDASH} folded away, deliberately not a marker`,
    `# STATE ${EMDASH} title heading`,
    '',
  ].join('\n');
  const { markers, losses } = extractMarkers(text);
  assert.equal(markers.length, 0);
  assert.deepEqual(losses, [], 'only a KNOWN status token makes a line a marker attempt');
});

test('V6: buildRegister surfaces marker losses per repo, naming the STATE file', () => {
  const repos = [{
    name: 'some-repo',
    statePath: '/repos/some-repo/STATE.md',
    markers: [], // losses-only: the repo must still be reported, not skipped
    losses: [{ lineNo: 78, line: 'some-topic: planned -- prose after an ASCII separator' }],
    carrier: null,
    carrierMode: 'absent',
  }];
  const { markerLosses } = buildRegister({ repos });
  assert.equal(markerLosses.length, 1);
  assert.equal(markerLosses[0].repo, 'some-repo');
  assert.equal(markerLosses[0].statePath, '/repos/some-repo/STATE.md');
  assert.equal(markerLosses[0].lineNo, 78);
});

// --- D1 discovery: depth 1 + depth 2 under polyrepo containers (board.sh's rule) ---
// Identity is the RAW BASENAME so this builder and board.sh name the same repo the same
// way (board.sh:100). Mirrors board.sh:63-89: a dir that is itself a git repo contributes
// itself and is NOT descended into; a non-repo dir containing git repos is a container.
function tree(spec) {
  const root = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'rollup-discovery-'));
  for (const [rel, state] of Object.entries(spec)) {
    const dir = join(root, rel);
    mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
    if (state !== null) {
      mkdirSync(join(dir, '.git'), { recursive: true });
      writeFileSync(join(dir, 'STATE.md'), state);
    }
  }
  return root;
}

const MARKER = `topic-a: planned ${EMDASH} prose\n`;

test('D1: a depth-1 git repo with markers is discovered (unchanged behaviour)', () => {
  const root = tree({ 'solo': MARKER });
  const repos = discoverRepos(root);
  assert.deepEqual(repos.map((r) => r.name), ['solo']);
});

test('D1: repos under a polyrepo container (depth 2) are discovered', () => {
  // The measured gap: ktg-plugin-marketplace/{catalog,linkedin-studio,ms-ai-architect}
  // carried 5 markers that the depth-1 glob could not see.
  const root = tree({
    'marketplace/catalog': MARKER,
    'marketplace/linkedin-studio': MARKER,
    'solo': MARKER,
  });
  const repos = discoverRepos(root);
  assert.deepEqual(
    repos.map((r) => r.name).sort(),
    ['catalog', 'linkedin-studio', 'solo'],
    'container children contribute; the container itself never does',
  );
});

test('D1: a git repo is NOT descended into (the nested same-name trap stays unreachable)', () => {
  // claude-code-100x/claude-code-100x: the outer IS a git repo, so board.sh's rule never
  // reaches the inner one. Matching that rule makes this collision structurally impossible
  // rather than merely absent today.
  const root = tree({ 'outer': MARKER, 'outer/outer': MARKER });
  const repos = discoverRepos(root);
  assert.deepEqual(repos.map((r) => r.name), ['outer'], 'the inner repo must not be reached');
});

test('D1: a STATE.md in a non-git directory is not a repo', () => {
  const root = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'rollup-discovery-'));
  mkdirSync(join(root, 'scratch'), { recursive: true });
  writeFileSync(join(root, 'scratch', 'STATE.md'), MARKER);
  assert.deepEqual(discoverRepos(root), [], 'no .git -> not a repo (board.sh:78)');
});

test('D1: a basename collision fails LOUDLY instead of silently overwriting', () => {
  // Raw basename was chosen so this builder and the coord mailbox name repos alike;
  // measured 0 collisions across 25 state-bearing dirs today, which is a fact, not a
  // guarantee -- so the ambiguity must be an error, never a silent pick-one.
  const root = tree({ 'dup': MARKER, 'container/dup': MARKER });
  assert.throws(
    () => discoverRepos(root),
    (err) => {
      assert.match(err.message, /collision/i);
      assert.match(err.message, /dup/);
      return true;
    },
    'two STATE.md files resolving to one name must stop the build',
  );
});