Critical-review §2 B3 finding: `riskScore({info: N}) = 0` silently masks
info-volume findings. The behavior was correct (info is scoring-inert by
design) but undocumented. Operators reading a report with N info findings
had no way to know they contribute zero to verdict/band.
Three coordinated edits:
- scanners/lib/severity.mjs JSDoc — explicit "Info severity" subsection
spelling out: scoring-inert, surfaced in owaspCategorize aggregates,
treat as observability telemetry not verdict input. @param updated to
mark info as accepted but ignored.
- CLAUDE.md v7.0.0 risk-score-v2 line — one-sentence anchor pointing to
severity.mjs JSDoc.
- tests/lib/severity.test.mjs — anchor test alongside the existing
4-critical=93 anchor: asserts riskScore({info: 50}) === 0,
riskScore({info: 1000}) === 0, verdict({info: 100}) === 'ALLOW',
riskBand(riskScore({info: 500})) === 'Low'.
Decision: skip the optional `infoScore()` helper from the brief. No
current consumer would use it; doc-only fix keeps API surface minimal.
Revisit if a consumer emerges.
Tests: 1522 → 1523 (+1 anchor block, 4 assertions). All green.
3cd68dc9fb