Closes A2 of v7.1.0 critical-review patch (docs/critical-review-2026-04-20.md):
- B4 (severity JSDoc): 4 critical = 93, not 90. Fixed in scanners/lib/severity.mjs:23
and CHANGELOG.md v7.0.0 tier description. The actual computation has always been
93 (70 + log2(5)*10 = 93.22 → round); only the docs were wrong.
- §5.4 co-monotonicity: new sweep test in tests/lib/severity.test.mjs over 15
representative count vectors. Asserts that (verdict, riskBand) agree under the
v7.0.0 contract for every case — catches future drift between riskScore tiers,
verdict cutoffs, and riskBand cutoffs. Includes a B4 anchor test (riskScore
{critical: 4} === 93) so doc/code drift fails loudly.
- B8 (CaMeL claims toned down): post-session-guard.mjs:646 comment block and
CLAUDE.md:184 Defense Philosophy bullet now describe the implementation
honestly — opportunistic byte-matching of truncated output fingerprints
(first 200 bytes, SHA-256/16-hex), not semantic data-flow tracking.
Trivially bypassed by mutation, summarisation, or re-encoding. Inspired by
CaMeL (DeepMind 2025), but not a CaMeL capability-tracking implementation.
Tests: 1495 → 1511 (+16: 15 sweep cases + 1 B4 anchor). All green.
4aa5318bcb