# Editorial-Reviewer Fasit Fixture

The Del 4 production round (Maskinrommet, 2026-05-28) as the gold standard for the
`editorial-reviewer` agent. The persona resonance sweep returned 15 flags across
three personas (Linjeleder C primær + KI-seksjon B sekundær + IT-direktør A
sekundær) and **every persona reported PASS / ready-to-publish**. KTG then found
**eight editorial points on first reading** — and only ~25 % of them overlapped
anything the personas had touched. The other six were craft/architecture blind
spots. Those eight points are the fasit below: a correct `editorial-reviewer` run
on Del 4 v5 should surface **comparable flags**, mapped to the two axes with
consistent severities.

This file is a *fasit*, not a test harness. The structural lint lives in
`agents/__tests__/editorial-reviewer-fixture.test.mjs`. Whether the agent's live
flags actually reproduce these directions is `[GATE]`/`[OPERATØR]` — it is **not**
self-certified here.

> **The jury judges; the writer writes.** Every expected output below is
> **direction, not rewritten copy.** A correct agent run hands back flags + a
> severity — never edited prose. (`Foreslått retning`, not a new sentence.)

> **Why this gate exists.** A persona PASS measures *reader response*, not *craft*.
> Six of these eight points were invisible to the persona sweep because they are
> architecture and prose-craft defects, not resonance defects. The numbers tell
> the story: persona overlap ≈ 2/8; editorial-only ≈ 6/8.

---

## The two axes (the agent judges on exactly these)

Both axes are the operationalized mirror of the **Maskinrommet skrivekontrakt
§C2** — §C2 is the source of truth; this fixture and the agent's checklist follow
it. (§C2 is the craft half of the writing contract; §A — skeleton-before-prose —
is codified in `references/longform-quality-rules.md` rule 8.)


- **Prosa-håndverk** (mechanical, grep-able): P1 tankestrek-tetthet · P2 ordrette
  gjentakelser · P3 postulerte tall uten kilde/hedge · P4 indre selvmotsigelse ·
  P5 versal-tic.
- **Narrativ-arkitektur** (evaluative): A1 konkret instansiering · A2 teori-anker
  for hypoteser · A3 serietittel-symmetri · A4 like-brukbar handling per adressat ·
  A5 konklusjon ikke overlastet.

## Severity (every flag carries exactly one)

- **BLOCK** — misrepresents the piece or loses the takeaway.
- **REWORK** — a real craft/architecture weakness, not load-bearing-fatal.
- **NICE** — cheap polish, fold in if convenient.

---

## The eight Del 4 editorial points (fasit)

Each case states the point KTG raised, the axis it belongs to, the expected
severity, and the direction a correct agent run returns. The persona-overlap
column records whether the persona sweep had already (partially) touched it —
the whole reason the gate is needed is the rows marked **blindsone**.

### Case 1 — manglende konkret eksempel (abstract figure never instantiated)

- **Axis:** A1 (arkitektur) · **Severity:** REWORK
- **Persona overlap:** delvis (KI-seksjon B brushed it) — *not* a pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** An abstract figure carries the section but never lands on
  one concrete case the reader can picture. Direction: instantiate with a single
  verifiable (preferably Norwegian) case — do not list several. The agent flags
  the *absence of instantiation*; it does not supply the case.

### Case 2 — postulert tall uten kilde eller hedge (postulated number)

- **Axis:** P3 (prosa) · **Severity:** REWORK
- **Persona overlap:** delvis (IT-direktør A brushed it).
- **Fasit / direction:** A specific figure is stated as fact with neither an inline
  source marker nor a hedge. This is distinct from a fact-check finding — Step 5
  verifies numbers that *have* a provenance; here the provenance is simply
  **absent**. Direction: source it or hedge it ("anslagsvis"); else cut.

### Case 3 — manglende SDT-anker for tillit-effekt (unanchored hypothesis) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** A2 (arkitektur) · **Severity:** BLOCK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** A psychological hypothesis about a trust effect is asserted
  as if established, with no named theory anchor (e.g. Self-Determination Theory)
  and no explicit hedge. A hypothesis dressed as a finding is an architecture
  defect. Direction: anchor in a named model OR mark it explicitly as hypothesis.

### Case 4 — brutt serietittel-kobling (broken series-title symmetry) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** A3 (arkitektur) · **Severity:** REWORK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** The part does not bind back to the series premise / its own
  title — it floats free of the whole. Direction: tie the part's argument back to
  the series title so the reader feels the part-of-a-whole. (N/A only for a
  standalone edition; Del 4 is part of a series, so it applies.)

### Case 5 — manglende småbedrifts-tommelfingerregel (stranded addressee) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** A4 (arkitektur) · **Severity:** BLOCK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** The text addresses more than one reader but the actionable
  takeaway only serves one; the small-business reader leaves with nothing they can
  do. Direction: add a small-business rule of thumb so each addressee gets an
  equally-usable action. (Stranding an addressee = BLOCK: that reader has no
  takeaway at all.)

### Case 6 — ordrette gjentakelser (verbatim repetition) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** P2 (prosa) · **Severity:** REWORK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** A distinctive phrase recurs more than twice. Direction:
  vary or cut the repeats; keep at most the one load-bearing use. `grep`-findable.

### Case 7 — tankestrek-tetthet (em-dash over-density) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** P1 (prosa) · **Severity:** REWORK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** Em-dashes run above ~1 per 50 words (clusters within
  paragraphs). Direction: thin them to the local target; the em-dash is a tool,
  not a tic. Report the count. `grep`-findable.

### Case 8 — indre selvmotsigelse (internal contradiction) — BLINDSONE

- **Axis:** P4 (prosa) · **Severity:** BLOCK
- **Persona overlap:** none — pure blind spot.
- **Fasit / direction:** Two passages cannot both be true (an assertion the
  conclusion silently reverses). Direction: name the contradiction and resolve one
  side — a contradiction misrepresents the piece, so BLOCK.

---

## Expected aggregate (what a correct run looks like)

- **Total flags:** 8 (well within the ≤10 cap — no suppression needed).
- **By axis:** prosa-håndverk = 4 (P1, P2, P3, P4) · narrativ-arkitektur = 4 (A1,
  A2, A3, A4). A5 (overloaded conclusion) and P5 (versal-tic) did **not** flag on
  Del 4 v5 — record them clean.
- **By severity:** BLOCK = 3 (A2, A4, P4) · REWORK = 5 (A1, P3, A3, P2, P1) ·
  NICE = 0.
- **Persona overlap:** 2/8 (Cases 1 + 2, both delvis) · editorial-only blind
  spots: 6/8 (Cases 3–8). This 6/8 is the quantified case for the gate.

A run that reproduces ~these eight directions, on ~these axes, with ~these
severities, is **comparable** to KTG's actual editorial round — the bar
acceptance-criterion #8 sets. Exact wording is the editor's; the agent returns
direction, never copy.

## Calibration boundary

Whether the agent's live flags truly match this fasit is judged by the operator
(`[OPERATØR]`), not self-certified here. This fixture is the calibration target,
the same way `persona-reviewer-cases.md` and `fact-checker-cases.md` are fasits
for their agents.

> **Live-run note.** A live run on Del 4 v5 requires (a) a Claude Code session
> reload — a freshly added agent is not invokable until the plugin agent set is
> rebuilt at session start — and (b) read access to the Del 4 v5 draft in the
> Maskinrommet series folder. Until both hold, this fixture is the gold-standard
> of record.
