# Fact-Checker Fasit Fixture

Three reference claims with known ground truth, used to sanity-check the
`fact-checker` agent. Each case states the claim, the **fasit** (the correct
answer + why), and the expected risk verdict.

- 🟢 = verified true against a primary/credible source
- 🔴 = contradicted by evidence (false), or a high-risk claim asserted without support
- 🟡 = unverifiable from available sources — flagged, never guessed

This file is a *fasit*, not a test harness. The structural lint lives in
`agents/__tests__/fact-checker-fixture.test.mjs`. Whether the agent's live
output actually reproduces these verdicts is `[GATE]`/`[OPERATØR]` — it is
not self-certified.

Each case block below carries exactly one verdict emoji (in its **Verdict**
field); the prose deliberately avoids emoji so the structural lint can read a
single, unambiguous verdict per case.

---

## Case 1 — verifiable true

- **Claim:** The EU AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024.
- **Verdict:** 🟢
- **Fasit:** True. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 was published in the Official
  Journal on 12 July 2024 and entered into force 20 days later, on
  1 August 2024. This is confirmable against the primary source (EUR-Lex)
  and the European Commission's own communications. A correct agent run
  returns the verified verdict with a primary-source citation.

## Case 2 — verifiable false

- **Claim:** GPT-4 was developed and released by Anthropic.
- **Verdict:** 🔴
- **Fasit:** False. GPT-4 was released by OpenAI (March 2023). Anthropic
  develops the Claude model family. The claim is contradicted by both
  vendors' primary documentation. A correct agent run returns the high-risk
  verdict and names the contradicting source — it must not soften a
  contradicted claim to the unverified tier.

## Case 3 — unverifiable

- **Claim:** A Norwegian public-sector agency cut its case-handling time by
  exactly 37% in Q3 2025 after deploying an internal AI assistant.
- **Verdict:** 🟡
- **Fasit:** Unverifiable. No named agency, no published report, and no
  primary source exists for this precise figure; an internal operational
  metric of this kind is not independently confirmable from open sources.
  A correct agent run returns the unverified verdict and states explicitly
  that the claim cannot be verified — it must not fill the gap by inventing
  a plausible source or promoting the claim to the verified tier.
