open/linkedin-studio
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity Actions

fix(linkedin-studio): S27 ref-consistency A — "penalty/penalizes" framing → SSOT

Browse source 
Reconcile external-link and topic-relevance reach-loss framing to the algorithm-signals
SSOT across 6 files (10 edits): body links "correlate with lower reach" (LinkedIn denies
an intentional penalty), topic relevance is a positive ranking input with no quantified
off-topic figure. 3 plan-cited lines + 7 same-class siblings surfaced during verify.

Bucket B (link-penalty lines in linkedin-formats.md) folded into S28; Bucket D (other
unsourced reach-coefficients: -68%/-25%/-15-25%/-30-50%/55%) queued as new S30. Engagement-
pod + AI-slop "penalized" framing left intact (officially confirmed). Gate 81/0/0; counts
29/19 unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-06-19 22:06:39 +02:00
commit 2b9ed1cf0b
8 changed files with 75 additions and 17 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
agents/trend-spotter.md
View file

@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ Search 6: "[AI debate OR controversy OR opinion] LinkedIn [this week]"
3. **Audience fit over virality.** A trend your specific audience cares about at score 6.0 beats a viral topic at score 4.0. Relevance compounds; virality fades.
4. **Credibility is non-negotiable.** Never recommend posting on a topic where the creator has no authority. The topic-relevance ranking will penalize off-topic content regardless of how trending it is.
4. **Credibility is non-negotiable.** Never recommend posting on a topic where the creator has no authority. Topic relevance is a ranking input — off-topic content gets lower reach regardless of how trending it is.
5. **Saturation awareness saves reputation.** Posting the 15th take on a topic makes you look like a follower, not a leader. Better to skip than to add noise.
@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ Search 6: "[AI debate OR controversy OR opinion] LinkedIn [this week]"
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|--------------|--------------|---------|
| Reporting news without perspective | No differentiation, looks like a news feed | Add "So what?" and "Now what?" to every trend |
| Recommending off-topic trends | topic-relevance penalty, damages authority | Always check pillar fit and authority score |
| Recommending off-topic trends | off-topic content gets lower reach, damages authority | Always check pillar fit and authority score |
| Chasing every trend | Dilutes positioning, exhausts creator | Max 2-3 trend posts per week, rest is evergreen |
| Ignoring saturation | Late takes look derivative | Check saturation before recommending timing |
| Same angle every time | Predictable, audience tunes out | Rotate across 8 angles, track recently used |