fix(linkedin-studio): S27 ref-consistency A — "penalty/penalizes" framing → SSOT
Reconcile external-link and topic-relevance reach-loss framing to the algorithm-signals SSOT across 6 files (10 edits): body links "correlate with lower reach" (LinkedIn denies an intentional penalty), topic relevance is a positive ranking input with no quantified off-topic figure. 3 plan-cited lines + 7 same-class siblings surfaced during verify. Bucket B (link-penalty lines in linkedin-formats.md) folded into S28; Bucket D (other unsourced reach-coefficients: -68%/-25%/-15-25%/-30-50%/55%) queued as new S30. Engagement- pod + AI-slop "penalized" framing left intact (officially confirmed). Gate 81/0/0; counts 29/19 unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
This commit is contained in:
parent
47782eb91d
commit
2b9ed1cf0b
8 changed files with 75 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ Before publishing URL-based content:
|
|||
| Copying structure | Looks like plagiarism | Restructure for LinkedIn |
|
||||
| Burying the source | Appears deceptive | Credit early |
|
||||
| Over-quoting | Looks lazy | Paraphrase more |
|
||||
| Link in post body | Reach penalty | Move to comment |
|
||||
| Link in post body | Correlates with lower reach | Move to comment |
|
||||
| Missing CTA | Lower engagement | Add discussion question |
|
||||
| Wrong angle | Doesn't fit expertise | Choose relevant angle |
|
||||
| Too timely | Loses relevance fast | Add evergreen insight |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue