fix(linkedin-studio): S16 harden analyze — drop unsourced 5+ hashtags penalty

S16 analyze through the v2 interactive quality gate (analytics/diagnostic class —
prose-diagnosis + conditional agent-delegation, NOT CLI-backed: allowed-tools
Read/AskUserQuestion/Task, no Bash). 1 finding, 1 surgical edit in
commands/analyze.md, grep-confirmed + grounded persona sim (scenario 1, reach -50%):

- FUNN (axis-b'): Step 4 penalty checklist asked 'Did you use 5+ hashtags in posts?'
  — a concrete-number penalty absent from BOTH the SSOT
  (algorithm-signals-reference.md: no hashtag claim, deliberately omitted) AND the
  cited troubleshooting-guide.md (its own checklist is 6 items, no hashtag).
  Command-only unsourced folklore. Dropped analyze.md:149; kept :150 'tag unrelated
  people for reach' (defensible — aligns with SSOT bait/pod-suppression direction,
  no numeric claim).

Verified clean: interpret-mode wiring (analytics-interpreter resolves, real default
mode agent:6,39,141), shared data-dir seam (analyze:41 <-> agent:49),
/linkedin:profile cross-ref, graceful-degradation IF, saves/dwell honesty (no Bash,
no over-promise). External-link hard-penalty framing in troubleshooting-guide.md:127
vs SSOT logged as reference-pass follow-up (out of S16 scope — not touched).

Gate: test-runner 81/0/0 exit 0; counts 29/19 unchanged (.md-only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE

commands/analyze.md

@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ Run through this checklist:
 - [ ] Are topics all over the place recently?
 - [ ] Did you receive generic AI-like comments?
 - [ ] Did you post way more/less frequently than usual?
-- [ ] Did you use 5+ hashtags in posts?
 - [ ] Did you tag unrelated people for reach?
 
 ## Step 5: Reach Drop Severity Assessment