refactor(linkedin-studio): S29e terminology-scrub — rename thought-leadership-angles.md -> content-angles.md + all pointers
Final sub-pass of the S29 plugin-wide terminology scrub. The canonical reference file is renamed and every functional pointer updated atomically in one commit. The file's in-file title/headers were already FORM A-scrubbed in S29c (H1 reads "Content Angles"), so S29e is a pure rename + pointer update — no FORM A remained in the file. Rename: references/thought-leadership-angles.md -> references/content-angles.md (git mv). Pointers updated (17 files, 29 occurrences) — token "thought-leadership-angles" -> "content-angles": - references/ (2): ai-content-framework, glossary - agents/ (7): content-repurposer, strategy-advisor, network-builder, content-planner, trend-spotter, video-scripter, differentiation-checker - commands/ (6): pipeline, video, post, competitive, react, batch - skills/ (1): linkedin-content-creation/SKILL - docs/ (1, forward-looking): integration-test-guide Left URØRT per the standing S29 decision (history = honest record of a past state, not a runtime load): CHANGELOG.md, docs/hardening/log.md, docs/hardening/plan.md. STATE.md untouched here (rewritten at session end). Verify: no thought-leadership-angles* file remains; references/content-angles.md present; zero residual "thought-leadership-angles" in commands/agents/references/skills/integration-test-guide; structure gate scripts/test-runner.sh 81/0/0 exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
This commit is contained in:
parent
a534edf4fc
commit
9e5695286d
18 changed files with 29 additions and 29 deletions
|
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ To situate the post in the broader plan — does it fill a content-mix gap or re
|
|||
|
||||
Once topic is chosen, create the draft:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Select angle** — Auto-select the strongest angle from `references/thought-leadership-angles.md` based on topic and user's expertise. Present ONE recommended angle with reasoning. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion — just proceed. If user disagrees, offer alternatives.
|
||||
1. **Select angle** — Auto-select the strongest angle from `references/content-angles.md` based on topic and user's expertise. Present ONE recommended angle with reasoning. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion — just proceed. If user disagrees, offer alternatives.
|
||||
2. **Infer format** — Default to text post. Only mention carousel/video as a note if particularly well-suited.
|
||||
3. **Write draft** — Following the structure:
|
||||
- Hook: 110-140 characters
|
||||
|
|
@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ Replace placeholders with actual post data. Set `next_planned_topic` manually if
|
|||
|
||||
## Reference Files
|
||||
|
||||
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/thought-leadership-angles.md`
|
||||
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/content-angles.md`
|
||||
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/engagement-frameworks.md`
|
||||
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/algorithm-signals-reference.md`
|
||||
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/linkedin-formats.md`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue