fix(linkedin-studio): N19 — terminologi-sveip (8 treff) + monetize scorecard/scope [skip-docs]

Terminologi (memory no-thought-leadership-phrase, plugin-is-domain-general):
erstatter "thought leader(s)" med nøytral, kontekstvalgt ordbruk i de 8
load-bearing treffene — competitive.md:4,17,31,34 · monetize.md:4 ·
linkedin.md:145 · strategy.md:371 · outreach.md:229.

Fasit-korreksjon: planens "14 treff / 6 gjenværende" var en telle-feil.
`git grep` mot planens egen baseline 882f6ee gir 15 — settet er uendret
siden da, kun linkedin.md (118→145) og post.md (134→142) har flyttet seg.
Riktig regnestykke er 15 = 8 fiks + 7 urørte.

De 7 urørte er alle bevisste negative eksempler og står med vilje:
- pipeline.md:79, post.md:142, react.md:131 — buzzword-blocklisten i
  pre-publish-sjekklisten (Content Quality Rule #4; frasen ER regelen)
- carousel.md:123, video.md:129 — samme blocklist sitert i caption-steget
- profile.md:79 — "thought leader"/"guru"/"ninja" som headline-antimønster
- profile.md:101 — en dårlig headline vist som avskrekkende eksempel

Monetize:
- Audience Size summerte 40 mot /25 (5+10+15+5+5). Follower-tiersene er nå
  ett gjensidig utelukkende valg (pick ONE), så maks blir 15+5+5 = 25.
  Alle fire dimensjoner summerer nå eksakt 25 → TOTAL /100 er ekte.
- Beskrivelsens "Works from 1K+ followers" motsa Stage 1 (0–1K, :92).
  Staged formulering i stedet, konsistent med linkedin.md-gatingregelen
  ("work at any follower count, value compounds") og CLAUDE.md-tabellens
  "unlocks at ~1K followers".

Verifisert: re-grep gir nøyaktig 7 gjenværende, alle på ikke-rør-lista.
ASCII-boksen måler 60 tegn på hver linje. Alle ti suiter grønne —
test-runner 270/0 (269 assertions >= floor 251) · analytics 202/0 ·
trends 300/0 · hooks 191/0 · brain 134/0 · editions 72/0 · render 63/0 ·
specifics-bank 45/0 · tests 35/0 · contract-gate 33/0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PbMAQ3MR3TvDtAznxRNbR8

commands/competitive.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: linkedin:competitive
 description: |
-  Competitive analysis of other LinkedIn thought leaders in your niche. Analyzes posting
+  Competitive analysis of other LinkedIn creators in your niche. Analyzes posting
   frequency, content types, hooks, engagement strategies, and identifies gaps and
   opportunities for differentiation. Triggers on: "competitive analysis", "analyze competitor",
   "what are others doing", "linkedin competitive", "learn from others", "niche analysis".
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ allowed-tools:
 
 # LinkedIn Competitive Analysis
 
-You are a LinkedIn competitive intelligence analyst. Help the user learn from other thought leaders in their niche to find opportunities for differentiation.
+You are a LinkedIn competitive intelligence analyst. Help the user learn from established creators in their niche to find opportunities for differentiation.
 
 ## Step 0: Load Context
 
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@ Ask the user to provide 3-5 LinkedIn profiles to analyze:
 
 Use AskUserQuestion:
 1. I have specific profiles to analyze
-2. Help me find thought leaders in my niche
+2. Help me find leading voices in my niche
 3. I want to analyze people who inspire me
 
-If they need help finding profiles, use WebSearch to identify key thought leaders in their expertise areas.
+If they need help finding profiles, use WebSearch to identify the most visible voices in their expertise areas.
 
 For each profile, note:
 - Name and headline