fix(linkedin-studio): S29b terminology-scrub — "thought leadership" → neutral (agents/)

Second sub-pass of the S29 plugin-wide terminology scrub: the banned brand phrase
"thought leadership" (FORM A) removed from the agent surface. 17 edits across 6 agents
(strategy-advisor, content-planner, voice-trainer, network-builder, differentiation-checker,
trend-spotter). Vocabulary consistent with S29a: "thought leadership angle(s)" → "content
angle(s)"; "thought leadership" (positioning/practice) → "authority …"; the whole "Value Test"
family → "Authority Value Test".

15 in-file phrase occurrences (space-grep) + 2 abbreviated "TL Value Test" instances found
during the header anchor-check (trend-spotter:192/:257, TL = Thought Leadership) — surfaced as
an addendum and operator-approved before edit, scope not expanded silently. The
differentiation-checker:47 web-search query thought leadership → expert insights
(functional-keyword judgment-call, operator option b).

Scope (operator-locked, inherits S29a): FORM A only. FORM B ("thought leader(s)" as role,
agents = 2) untouched. The 11 thought-leadership-angles.md filename pointers deferred to S29e.

Verify: FORM A in agents/ = NONE; abbreviated TL = NONE; FORM B unchanged (2); filename
pointers unchanged (11); diff 6 files 1:1; gate 81/0/0; counts 29/19/26/6 + v0.5.0 unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-06-19 22:53:14 +02:00
commit b6ba826be5
6 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Before searching, identify:
1. **Direct topic:** `site:linkedin.com "[key phrase from thesis]"`
2. **Competing angle:** `"[topic]" AND "[angle keyword]" site:linkedin.com`
3. **Broad topic:** `"[topic]" thought leadership 2025 2026`
3. **Broad topic:** `"[topic]" expert insights 2025 2026`
4. **Contrarian:** `"[topic]" "actually" OR "wrong" OR "myth"`
5. **Expert:** `"[topic]" expert opinion LinkedIn`
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Rate each as present (P), partially present (PP), or absent (A):
1. Echo chamber -- repeats what everyone says
2. Humble brag -- disguised self-promotion
3. Vague wisdom -- platitudes without specifics
4. Pure promotion -- marketing as thought leadership
4. Pure promotion -- marketing posing as expertise
5. Borrowed authority -- citing without adding perspective
6. Generic listicle -- numbered list, no unique framing
7. Tired take -- exhausted arguments ("AI will replace [job]")
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Combine 2-3 of the 8 Universal Angles:
- **Reverse causation:** "We think X causes Y. What if Y causes X?"
- **Zoom out/in:** Switch between big-picture and meeting-room perspective.
## Thought Leadership Value Test
## Authority Value Test
Every piece must pass at least **two of three:**
@ -324,6 +324,6 @@ content-planner --> [draft] --> differentiation-checker --> content-optimizer --
## References
Read these files for detailed methodology:
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/thought-leadership-angles.md` -- 8 Universal Angles, combinations, red flags, thought leadership test
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/thought-leadership-angles.md` -- 8 Universal Angles, combinations, red flags, authority value test
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/ai-content-framework.md` -- AI content anti-patterns, differentiation checklist, relevance filter
- `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/engagement-frameworks.md` -- hook types, contrarian opening patterns, story structures