fix(linkedin-studio): S29d terminology-scrub — "thought leadership" → neutral (skills/config/assets/hooks-test)

Fourth sub-pass of the S29 plugin-wide terminology scrub: the banned brand phrase
"thought leadership" (FORM A) removed from the remaining surfaces — skills, a config template,
shipped assets, and a test fixture. 8 edits across 6 files. Vocabulary consistent with
S29a-S29c: "thought leadership angle(s)" -> "content angle(s)"; the "Value Test" family ->
"Authority Value Test"; "Standard Thought Leadership Post" -> "Standard Post" (matches the
S29a/S29c "Standard Post Structure" equivalent).

Edits: skills/linkedin-content-creation (3) "Identify Thought Leadership Angles" -> "Content
Angles", "Standard Thought Leadership Post" -> "Standard Post", "The 8 Thought Leadership
Angles" -> "The 8 Content Angles"; skills/linkedin-strategy:176 phase-focus cell "Thought
leadership, cross-platform" -> "Signature content, ..." (avoids the Authority-phase column
echo); config/user-profile.template:35 "Build thought leadership & authority" -> "Build
authority & influence"; assets/checklists/quality-scorecard:136 "Passes thought leadership
test" -> "Passes Authority Value Test"; assets/case-studies/case-study-template:173 "Best for:
Thought leadership" -> "Authority content"; hooks/scripts/__tests__/clipboard-helper.test:61
unicode fixture "Thought leadership" -> "Authority" (emoji + arrow retained; coverage unchanged).

Scope (operator-locked, inherits S29a-S29c): FORM A only. FORM B = 8 untouched -- the 5
buzzword-denylist entries MUST list the banned word ("thought leader"), plus 3 role usages
(linkedin-networking x2, README "niche thought leaders"). The 21 thought-leadership-angles.md
filename pointers deferred to S29e. No anchor links to the changed headers anywhere in the
plugin. Forward-looking docs already clean.

Verify: FORM A in scope = NONE; FORM B unchanged (8); filename pointers unchanged (21);
clipboard-helper test 13/0; gate 81/0/0; counts 29/19/26/6 + v0.5.0 unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE

assets/case-studies/case-study-template.md

@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Real examples from your work provide credibility and specificity that generic sc
 - What we learned
 - CTA: Ask what others would have done
 
-**Best for:** Thought leadership, showing expertise
+**Best for:** Authority content, showing expertise
 
 ---
 

assets/checklists/quality-scorecard.md

@@ -133,4 +133,4 @@ Before finalizing any post, verify:
 - [ ] Provides genuine value to readers
 - [ ] CTA is specific and natural
 - [ ] Passes the "mobile test" (readable on phone)
-- [ ] Passes thought leadership test: Does it help someone make a better decision or think differently?
+- [ ] Passes Authority Value Test: Does it help someone make a better decision or think differently?