diff --git a/agents/network-builder.md b/agents/network-builder.md index c0c1108..ce20307 100644 --- a/agents/network-builder.md +++ b/agents/network-builder.md @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ Profile networking signals: Headline: Include: What you do + Who you help + Signal (e.g., "Open to collabs") - Example: "AI Advisor @ [org] | Helping public sector adopt AI | Speaker & Writer" + Example: "Ops Lead @ [org] | Helping manufacturers cut downtime | Speaker & Writer" About section: Last paragraph should include: diff --git a/agents/video-scripter.md b/agents/video-scripter.md index 3e4570a..1f71597 100644 --- a/agents/video-scripter.md +++ b/agents/video-scripter.md @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ Naming convention: video-[YYYY-MM-DD]-[slug]-[type]-[length].md Examples: - video-2026-01-30-ai-implementation-talking-head-90s.md - video-2026-01-30-copilot-demo-screen-recording-60s.md + video-2026-01-30-onboarding-walkthrough-talking-head-90s.md + video-2026-01-30-dashboard-demo-screen-recording-60s.md ``` Update state in `~/.claude/linkedin-studio.local.md`: diff --git a/commands/post.md b/commands/post.md index d5064e4..cfbd5b1 100644 --- a/commands/post.md +++ b/commands/post.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Check for existing assets: ## Step 1: Understand the Input -If the user already provided a clear topic with the command invocation (e.g., `/linkedin:post about AI governance in public sector`), skip asking and proceed directly. Only ask if the input is missing or genuinely vague. +If the user already provided a clear topic with the command invocation (e.g., `/linkedin:post about pricing strategy for B2B SaaS`), skip asking and proceed directly. Only ask if the input is missing or genuinely vague. Identify the type of raw material: diff --git a/commands/profile.md b/commands/profile.md index fe9468d..8b1afed 100644 --- a/commands/profile.md +++ b/commands/profile.md @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ search. Optimize for both. in every search result and connection suggestion, and renders under your name across the site — so it does the most SEO work per character. Lead with the plain words people actually search (the role, the domain, the audience), not a clever -tagline. "AI Advisor · public-sector AI governance · Microsoft Copilot" is more +tagline. "Data Engineer · healthcare analytics · HIPAA-compliant pipelines" is more findable than "Turning chaos into clarity ✨". **Per-section keyword targets** (place the terms a searcher would type, in the @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Guide the user through each section using AskUserQuestion for interactive feedba - [ ] No jargon or vague titles **Strong example:** -"Helping public sector leaders implement AI that actually works | AI Advisor @ [Company]" +"Helping e-commerce teams turn returns data into retention | Retention Strategist @ [Company]" **Weak example:** "Digital Transformation Expert | Thought Leader | Speaker" @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Guide the user through each section using AskUserQuestion for interactive feedba **Transform each role with impact statements, not task lists.** **Bad:** "Responsible for AI initiatives" -**Good:** "Deployed first Copilot Studio agent handling 40% of internal inquiries" +**Good:** "Cut customer-support response time 40% by automating tier-1 triage" **Ask the user:** Describe your current role's key achievements with numbers/impact. diff --git a/commands/setup.md b/commands/setup.md index a0050ff..b6bb748 100644 --- a/commands/setup.md +++ b/commands/setup.md @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ Guide through each section of the profile: - "These should be topics you can consistently create content about for 90+ days" 3. **Target audience:** - - "Who is your primary audience? (e.g., 'Public sector leaders exploring AI')" + - "Who is your primary audience? (e.g., 'CFOs at mid-size SaaS companies' or 'public-sector IT leaders')" - "Secondary audience?" - "Geographic focus?" diff --git a/references/engagement-frameworks.md b/references/engagement-frameworks.md index 306790e..8124382 100644 --- a/references/engagement-frameworks.md +++ b/references/engagement-frameworks.md @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Pattern: Set a scene that resonates **10. The Direct Address** Pattern: Speak directly to a specific audience -- "If you're an AI leader in the public sector, we need to talk." +- "If you run RevOps at a B2B SaaS company, we need to talk." - "To everyone implementing AI right now: Pause and read this." - "Fellow AI advisors: Are we being honest about timelines?" diff --git a/references/first-comment-strategy.md b/references/first-comment-strategy.md index b6f29f6..ddee9a9 100644 --- a/references/first-comment-strategy.md +++ b/references/first-comment-strategy.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Key takeaway: [1-sentence summary of why it's worth clicking] **Example:** ``` -Here's the Microsoft research paper I mentioned: +Here's the research paper I mentioned: [URL] Key takeaway: They found that AI assistants improve developer productivity by 26% — but only when the developer already understands the fundamentals. diff --git a/references/opportunity-generation.md b/references/opportunity-generation.md index 2c93e49..d39a3d0 100644 --- a/references/opportunity-generation.md +++ b/references/opportunity-generation.md @@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ Your profile is your landing page. Optimize for the opportunities you want. **Structure:** [Identity] + [Value Proposition] + [Social Proof or Specificity] **Examples:** -- "AI Implementation Advisor | Helping public sector leaders deploy AI without the hype | 50+ projects delivered" -- "Low-Code AI Architect | Building practical AI solutions | Former Microsoft, now independent" -- "AI Strategy Consultant | Translating AI hype into business value | Speaker, Author" +- "Supply-Chain Analytics Lead | Helping retailers cut stockouts without bloating inventory | 50+ rollouts delivered" +- "Cloud Cost Architect | Building practical FinOps for scale-ups | Former Stripe, now independent" +- "B2B Growth Consultant | Translating marketing spend into qualified pipeline | Speaker, Author" **What to include:** - What you do (clearly) @@ -105,21 +105,21 @@ Your profile is your landing page. Optimize for the opportunities you want. **Example section:** ``` -I help public sector leaders implement AI that actually works. +I help operations leaders turn messy processes into measurable results. -After leading AI projects at [Organization] for 5 years, I saw the same pattern: -organizations spending millions on AI that never delivered value. Now I help +After leading improvement projects at [Organization] for 5 years, I saw the same pattern: +organizations spending heavily on tools that never delivered value. Now I help leaders avoid those expensive mistakes. What I do: -→ AI strategy development for public sector organizations +→ Process and workflow strategy for operations teams → Vendor-neutral technology advisory → Implementation oversight and quality assurance Who I help: -→ C-suite executives evaluating AI investments -→ Department heads responsible for AI projects -→ IT leaders managing AI implementations +→ C-suite executives evaluating major investments +→ Department heads responsible for transformation projects +→ Team leaders managing rollouts Track record: → 50+ AI projects delivered diff --git a/references/poll-strategy-guide.md b/references/poll-strategy-guide.md index dcc06de..b829c09 100644 --- a/references/poll-strategy-guide.md +++ b/references/poll-strategy-guide.md @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Hot take: Most "AI strategies" are just PowerPoint decks. ``` If you could only invest in ONE AI capability this year: -○ Copilot for productivity +○ Off-the-shelf AI assistants ○ Custom AI agents ○ Data platform modernization ○ AI literacy training for all staff diff --git a/references/url-processing-templates.md b/references/url-processing-templates.md index df13548..6976473 100644 --- a/references/url-processing-templates.md +++ b/references/url-processing-templates.md @@ -37,22 +37,22 @@ Comment #1: [Link to original article] **Example transformation:** -Source: "Microsoft announces new Copilot pricing tiers" +Source: "Figma announces new pricing tiers" ``` -The new Copilot pricing isn't about the money. It's about strategy. +The new Figma pricing isn't about the money. It's about strategy. -Microsoft just restructured their Copilot licensing. Most headlines focus on the $30/user price point. +Figma just restructured its licensing. Most headlines focus on the per-seat price point. Here's what they're missing: -The real story is differentiation. By splitting Copilot into tiers, Microsoft is: +The real story is differentiation. By splitting its plans into tiers, Figma is: 1. Creating an upgrade path (land and expand) 2. Protecting high-margin enterprise deals 3. Addressing the "too expensive for testing" problem -For organizations evaluating Copilot, this changes the conversation from "can we afford it?" to "which tier makes sense?" +For organizations evaluating Figma, this changes the conversation from "can we afford it?" to "which tier makes sense?" My prediction: Expect competitors to follow with similar tiered models within 6 months.