# Post Quality Scorecard (Pre-Publish Check) Use this scorecard before publishing ANY post to predict performance. --- ## Scoring System Rate each criterion 0-3: - 0 = Missing/Poor - 1 = Basic - 2 = Good - 3 = Excellent --- ## Profile Alignment (Weight: 2x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | Topic matches your 5 core areas | /3 | Algorithm checks expertise | | Consistent with recent content | /3 | Topical authority signal | | Language/tone matches profile | /3 | Authenticity marker | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 2 = **/18** | | --- ## Hook Strength (Weight: 2x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | Works in 140 characters | /3 | Mobile threshold | | Creates curiosity gap | /3 | Click-through driver | | Promises clear value | /3 | Worth reading? | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 2 = **/18** | | --- ## Dwell Time Potential (Weight: 1.5x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | Length 1,200-1,800 characters | /3 | Optimal range | | White space formatting | /3 | Easy to read | | Encourages re-reading | /3 | Saves, bookmarks | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 1.5 = **/13.5** | | --- ## Engagement Triggers (Weight: 1.5x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | CTA invites 15+ word comments | /3 | High-value engagement | | Shareable (others want to amplify) | /3 | Viral potential | | Save-worthy (reference value) | /3 | Top algorithm signal | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 1.5 = **/13.5** | | --- ## Format Optimization (Weight: 1x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | Right format for content | /3 | Carousel/text/image | | Mobile-optimized | /3 | 70% mobile users | | No external links in body | /3 | Avoid penalty | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 1 = **/9** | | --- ## Voice Authenticity (Weight: 1x) | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | Sounds like the author (not generic AI) | /3 | Check against voice samples | | Uses natural contractions and phrasing | /3 | Conversational, not formal | | Includes specific personal detail or anecdote | /3 | Personal observation or reference | | **Subtotal** | /9 x 1 = **/9** | | --- ## Total Score: /81 ### Pass/Fail Thresholds | Score | Action | |-------|--------| | **57+** | Excellent - post with confidence | | **46-56** | Good - consider one improvement | | **34-45** | Review needed - improve weakest area | | **Under 34** | Don't post - rework significantly | --- ## 360Brew Validation (Critical) Before posting, verify your profile passes the 360Brew test: - [ ] Profile clearly shows expertise in post topic - [ ] Headline includes relevant keywords - [ ] Recent activity supports topical authority - [ ] Featured section demonstrates credibility **If profile doesn't support the post topic, fix profile FIRST.** --- ## Quick Score (30-Second Version) For quick posts, use this simplified check: 1. On-topic for my expertise? (Y/N) 2. Hook works in 140 chars? (Y/N) 3. Clear value delivered? (Y/N) 4. Ends with engagement prompt? (Y/N) 5. No external links in body? (Y/N) **All 5 = Yes? -> Post it.** **Any No? -> Fix first.** --- ## Pre-Publish Basic Checklist Before finalizing any post, verify: - [ ] Hook works in first 110-140 characters - [ ] Character count within optimal range - [ ] Short paragraphs with white space - [ ] Tone is authentic, not corporate - [ ] Provides genuine value to readers - [ ] CTA is specific and natural - [ ] Passes the "mobile test" (readable on phone) - [ ] Passes thought leadership test: Does it help someone make a better decision or think differently?