Profile is a self-contained, prose-heavy Grow-tier audit command (no agent, no
routing, no state). Grant-hygiene was already clean (Read + AskUserQuestion, both
used, no orphans/missing). The one real axis was b': the file repeatedly framed
the relevance model as reading and VALIDATING your profile and gating distribution
on it — contradicting the SSOT (algorithm-signals-reference.md), which confirms
only topic/interest relevance as a ranking input (content matched to a viewer's
interests, incl. beyond your network) with no off-topic magnitude figure and no
weighted profile criteria. The file was internally inconsistent — its own soft,
SSOT-true framing already sat at :17/:25/:27.
12 edits, commands/profile.md only:
- desc :5: drop "validates your profile BEFORE distributing content".
- :31 + table: drop "the model evaluates five criteria (see SSOT)" false
attribution + HIGH/MEDIUM "Impact if Missing" postulated weights -> "LinkedIn
does not publish a profile-scoring breakdown ... practitioner heuristics",
column -> "Priority (heuristic)".
- :99/:161/:173/:230: reframe "first signal telling ... qualified" / "relevance
validation" / "checks if you're connected" / "if LinkedIn's AI read my profile,
would it believe" away from the profile-read-by-model mechanic.
- :25/:27/:51/:67: conflation fix — "your demonstrated expertise" / "tell the
relevance model what you're expert in" -> "a viewer's interests" / "topic-
relevance distribution" (SSOT wording) + no-percentage honesty.
- :24 (B2): "Goes to 10% of audience" -> "a slice of your network".
- :52/:61 (P3): "highest-weight search field" -> "highest-leverage" (self-
justified rest kept).
Verify: re-grep final file — all overclaim/conflation patterns NONE, new SSOT
text in place; grant-hygiene unchanged; test-runner 81/0/0 exit 0; counts 29/19
unchanged (.md-only). FIXED, 0 deferrals.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016qgzo6rxthw7KuxHjn5vyE
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
10e10897ca