feat(segmentation): parse the adjudication state a plan already carries
This commit is contained in:
parent
c54e8383df
commit
233cdc5671
2 changed files with 181 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -99,6 +99,23 @@ _CONVERTED_EXTRACTOR_IDS = frozenset({"docx", "xlsx", "pptx", "odt", "rtf"})
|
|||
_PDF_DISTRIBUTION = "pdfminer.six"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class SegmentVerdict:
|
||||
"""One adjudicator's judgement of one entry, with the time it cost.
|
||||
|
||||
Key names are B2's (`docs/plan/office-intake.md` § 5) verbatim, so the
|
||||
profile that projects this into frontmatter has nothing to translate.
|
||||
|
||||
The dwell time is not bookkeeping. A ratified flag carrying no per-item
|
||||
time is unfalsifiable -- nothing distinguishes a judgement from a click --
|
||||
and it is the same number that makes adjudication throughput measurable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
adjudicated_by: str
|
||||
adjudicated_at: str
|
||||
adjudication_dwell_s: int
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class SegmentAnchor:
|
||||
"""The text an entry names, plus enough context to find it again.
|
||||
|
|
@ -139,6 +156,7 @@ class SegmentEntry:
|
|||
parent_id: str | None = None
|
||||
derived: frozenset[str] = field(default_factory=frozenset)
|
||||
anchor: SegmentAnchor | None = None
|
||||
adjudication: SegmentVerdict | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
|
|
@ -162,6 +180,16 @@ class SegmentationPlan:
|
|||
extractor_version: str
|
||||
adjudicated_at: str
|
||||
entries: tuple[SegmentEntry, ...]
|
||||
#: Whether a human has ratified this plan. Absent means NOT adjudicated:
|
||||
#: the proposer has written the flag since it shipped, and the parser used
|
||||
#: to drop it, so a plan nobody had looked at parsed into an object
|
||||
#: identical to a ratified one. Defaulting the other way would let a
|
||||
#: proposal replay as a judgement, which is the failure this module exists
|
||||
#: to prevent.
|
||||
adjudicated: bool = False
|
||||
#: What produced the proposal, when one did. `None` for a plan authored by
|
||||
#: hand, which is a real case and not a missing value.
|
||||
proposed_by: str | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _require_str(payload: Mapping[str, Any], key: str, *, where: str) -> str:
|
||||
|
|
@ -285,6 +313,33 @@ def _parse_anchor(value: Any, *, where: str) -> SegmentAnchor | None:
|
|||
return SegmentAnchor(quote=quote, prefix=context["prefix"], suffix=context["suffix"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_verdict(value: Any, *, where: str) -> SegmentVerdict | None:
|
||||
if value is None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not isinstance(value, Mapping):
|
||||
raise SegmentationError(
|
||||
f"{where} field 'adjudication' must be a mapping carrying "
|
||||
"'adjudicated_by', 'adjudicated_at' and 'adjudication_dwell_s', "
|
||||
f"got {value!r}",
|
||||
code="segmentation_plan_invalid",
|
||||
)
|
||||
dwell = value.get("adjudication_dwell_s")
|
||||
# `bool` is a subclass of `int`, and `True` would silently record a dwell
|
||||
# of one second. The verdict is the record that makes ratification
|
||||
# falsifiable, so a nonsense number in it is worse than none.
|
||||
if not isinstance(dwell, int) or isinstance(dwell, bool) or dwell < 0:
|
||||
raise SegmentationError(
|
||||
f"{where} adjudication field 'adjudication_dwell_s' must be a whole "
|
||||
f"number of seconds, got {dwell!r}",
|
||||
code="segmentation_plan_invalid",
|
||||
)
|
||||
return SegmentVerdict(
|
||||
adjudicated_by=_require_str(value, "adjudicated_by", where=f"{where} adjudication"),
|
||||
adjudicated_at=_require_str(value, "adjudicated_at", where=f"{where} adjudication"),
|
||||
adjudication_dwell_s=dwell,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_entry(payload: Any, *, position: int) -> SegmentEntry:
|
||||
where = f"segmentation entry {position}"
|
||||
if not isinstance(payload, Mapping):
|
||||
|
|
@ -318,9 +373,35 @@ def _parse_entry(payload: Any, *, position: int) -> SegmentEntry:
|
|||
parent_id=parent_id,
|
||||
derived=_parse_derived(payload.get("derived", ()), where=where),
|
||||
anchor=_parse_anchor(payload.get("anchor"), where=where),
|
||||
adjudication=_parse_verdict(payload.get("adjudication"), where=where),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_adjudicated(value: Any) -> bool:
|
||||
# Not `bool(value)`. A JSON `"false"` is a non-empty string and would
|
||||
# ratify a plan by accident, which is the one direction this flag must
|
||||
# never fail in.
|
||||
if not isinstance(value, bool):
|
||||
raise SegmentationError(
|
||||
"the segmentation plan field 'adjudicated' must be a boolean — it records "
|
||||
f"whether a human ratified this plan, got {value!r}",
|
||||
code="segmentation_plan_invalid",
|
||||
)
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_proposed_by(value: Any) -> str | None:
|
||||
if value is None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
if not isinstance(value, str) or not value:
|
||||
raise SegmentationError(
|
||||
"the segmentation plan field 'proposed_by' must be a non-empty string or "
|
||||
f"absent, got {value!r}",
|
||||
code="segmentation_plan_invalid",
|
||||
)
|
||||
return value
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parse_segmentation_plan(payload: Mapping[str, Any]) -> SegmentationPlan:
|
||||
"""Validate an authored plan fail-fast, or refuse it with a typed code.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -396,6 +477,8 @@ def parse_segmentation_plan(payload: Mapping[str, Any]) -> SegmentationPlan:
|
|||
extractor_version=_require_str(payload, "extractor_version", where="the segmentation plan"),
|
||||
adjudicated_at=_require_str(payload, "adjudicated_at", where="the segmentation plan"),
|
||||
entries=entries,
|
||||
adjudicated=_parse_adjudicated(payload.get("adjudicated", False)),
|
||||
proposed_by=_parse_proposed_by(payload.get("proposed_by")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -531,3 +531,101 @@ def test_an_entry_without_an_anchor_keeps_todays_offset_behaviour() -> None:
|
|||
"""The anchor is a capability, not a new requirement on authored plans."""
|
||||
sliced = slice_segments(SECTIONS, five_section_plan())
|
||||
assert [item.span for item, _ in sliced] == list(SPANS)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- S5d: the adjudication state, parsed rather than discarded --------------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The proposer has written `adjudicated: false` and `proposed_by` into every
|
||||
# plan since the tool shipped, and the parser dropped both on the floor: a
|
||||
# plan a human had ratified parsed into an object byte-identical to one nobody
|
||||
# had looked at. The whole design rests on that distinction -- a proposal must
|
||||
# never be replayable as an adjudication -- so it has to survive parsing
|
||||
# before anything downstream can act on it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Key names are B2's, verbatim (`docs/plan/office-intake.md` § 5). One
|
||||
# vocabulary from plan to frontmatter, so the profile that writes the marker
|
||||
# has nothing to translate and nothing to get wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_ratified_plan_and_an_unratified_one_are_distinguishable() -> None:
|
||||
assert parse_segmentation_plan(plan(adjudicated=True)).adjudicated is True
|
||||
assert parse_segmentation_plan(plan(adjudicated=False)).adjudicated is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_an_unmarked_plan_is_not_adjudicated() -> None:
|
||||
"""Absence is the safe reading: nobody ratified a plan that never said so.
|
||||
|
||||
The opposite default would let a plan predating the field replay as a
|
||||
human judgement, which is the one thing this module exists to prevent.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
payload = plan()
|
||||
assert "adjudicated" not in payload
|
||||
assert parse_segmentation_plan(payload).adjudicated is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_non_boolean_adjudicated_flag_is_refused() -> None:
|
||||
"""`"false"` is truthy. A string here would ratify a plan by accident."""
|
||||
error = parse_fails(plan(adjudicated="false"))
|
||||
assert error.code == "segmentation_plan_invalid"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_proposer_identity_survives_parsing() -> None:
|
||||
parsed = parse_segmentation_plan(plan(proposed_by="okf-propose-segments/1"))
|
||||
assert parsed.proposed_by == "okf-propose-segments/1"
|
||||
assert parse_segmentation_plan(plan()).proposed_by is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_per_entry_verdict_round_trips_with_its_dwell_time() -> None:
|
||||
"""Dwell time travels WITH the verdict, per B2.
|
||||
|
||||
A ratified flag carrying no per-item time is unfalsifiable, and it is the
|
||||
same field that makes adjudication throughput measurable at all.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
verdict = {
|
||||
"adjudicated_by": "ktg",
|
||||
"adjudicated_at": "2026-09-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"adjudication_dwell_s": 41,
|
||||
}
|
||||
parsed = parse_segmentation_plan(plan(entries=[entry(adjudication=verdict)]))
|
||||
record = parsed.entries[0].adjudication
|
||||
assert record is not None
|
||||
assert record.adjudicated_by == "ktg"
|
||||
assert record.adjudicated_at == "2026-09-02T10:00:00Z"
|
||||
assert record.adjudication_dwell_s == 41
|
||||
assert parse_segmentation_plan(plan()).entries[0].adjudication is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_verdict_missing_its_dwell_time_is_refused() -> None:
|
||||
error = parse_fails(
|
||||
plan(
|
||||
entries=[
|
||||
entry(
|
||||
adjudication={
|
||||
"adjudicated_by": "ktg",
|
||||
"adjudicated_at": "2026-09-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert error.code == "segmentation_plan_invalid"
|
||||
assert "adjudication_dwell_s" in str(error)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_dwell_time_that_is_not_a_whole_number_of_seconds_is_refused() -> None:
|
||||
"""Integer seconds, per B2. `True` is an `int` in Python and is not one."""
|
||||
for bad in ("41", 41.5, True):
|
||||
error = parse_fails(
|
||||
plan(
|
||||
entries=[
|
||||
entry(
|
||||
adjudication={
|
||||
"adjudicated_by": "ktg",
|
||||
"adjudicated_at": "2026-09-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"adjudication_dwell_s": bad,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert error.code == "segmentation_plan_invalid"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue