feat(consume): parent reaches the reader -- excerpt field, body link, checker rule
K3-21 A. `okf consume` resolves a concept's `parent:` pointer -- a
`segment_id`, unique only inside one document's plan -- among the concepts
sharing its `source_file` (`consume.link_parents`, one pass, no file opened
again) and an excerpt carries `parent: { concept_id, title }`. Conditional
like `req_number`: a concept with no `parent` key moves no byte. A pointer
that lands nowhere is named `parent_unresolved: true`, never dropped.
The door writes ONE line into a heading-only body whose entry has a parent:
`Enclosing section: [<title>](/<bundle-relative path>)` (SPEC SS 5.1 lineage
through links, SS 6.1 the recommended absolute form and the kind in the
prose). Only such a body, so the segmented goldens' declared parents -- bodies
holding text -- are untouched. Appended AFTER structure derivation and
screened on its own (`_screened`, the `description` rule): read as body text
the link was derived into a second, unresolved `references` edge, measured on
the fixture. `segmentation.heading_only` is the one predicate the proposer and
the door share.
`okf check` gains its seventeenth rule, `parent_unfollowable`: a `parent`
that is not a concept_id and title, names its own excerpt, or names a concept
in neither `excerpts` nor `withheld` (together every considered concept).
Contract SS 8 point 6 added, the figure carries `parent`, and "additional
members are not read by the checker" now says the checker reads only the
members SS 8 names. The template tells the reader what `parent` is and that
SS 2.2 lets it read that one concept; `skill.CONDITIONAL_FIELDS` gains
`parent`. README and CLAUDE.md say what consume now reads.
Moved on purpose, each named: the SS 7.4 known-positive IS the contract
document, so `budget.known_positive` moves in every payload (13 238 / 12 893
/ 345 -> 14 455 / 14 083 / 372); `skills/okf-consume/` regenerated from the
segmented golden, whose plan declares s1 and s2 under s0 -- its example
payload now carries both parents; `test_bundle_identity` 16 -> 17 rules;
`test_shell_parent`'s byte test also accounts for the link line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5cd7c5688
commit
4f7bd61500
16 changed files with 319 additions and 58 deletions
|
|
@ -45,6 +45,18 @@ from typing import Any
|
|||
from .errors import SegmentationError
|
||||
from .materialize import reduce_to_id_grammar
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def heading_only(text: str) -> bool:
|
||||
"""`True` when no line of `text` holds anything but a markdown heading.
|
||||
|
||||
ONE predicate for two readers that must agree: the proposer gives such a
|
||||
span a parent (`propose._link_shells`), and the door writes a link into
|
||||
exactly those bodies. Both read the same window on the same extracted text,
|
||||
so a second copy of the rule could only ever disagree with the first.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return not any(line.strip() and not line.startswith("#") for line in text.split("\n"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#: The top-level keys a plan payload must carry. Every one is required: a plan
|
||||
#: missing its extractor identity would still parse, and would then be replayed
|
||||
#: against an extraction nobody checked it against.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue