open/llm-ingestion-okf
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 1 Activity

docs(okf-v0.2): GA criterion 9 is the backstop, not the mechanism

Browse source 
We told po-claude the notice lands before the GA release rather than with
it. A criterion verified at GA cannot enforce that ordering — as written it
would let the notice slide to GA day and still pass. Says so explicitly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JxRjDS9U2szUGYDeuZB2M3
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-02 21:38:50 +02:00
commit 90bec02c23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/plan/okf-v0.2-alignment.md
View file

@ -1222,7 +1222,9 @@ before GA rather than with it. It has now fallen and the notice has not been sen
9. The stamp's byte-form guarantee is stated where a consumer actually reads it
(CHANGELOG and the v0.2 profile docstring) and pinned by a test that asserts it
as a public interface rather than as an observation — and po-claude has been
sent the notice owed since 2026-08-02.
sent the notice owed since 2026-08-02. The notice is due *before* the GA
release, not as part of it: that is what we told them, so a criterion checked
at GA is the backstop here and not the mechanism.
**One honest limit on what GA can mean.** A three-repo pilot exercises only what
those three repos use. `sources` with `usage_window`, multi-verifier `verified`,