docs: the end-of-line stream that paints nothing, and the four smaller rests

The round's report, and the two published sentences it makes false.

CLAUDE.md said a delta and an end-of-line escape both state a skip every
decoder agrees on. True of the delta, false of the end-of-line, and the
paragraph now says what was measured instead: 703 of 22 620 swept streams
carried here and refused by Pillow, 1 492 drawn differently, 0 and 32 after
the two clauses, and the third clause that would give 0 and 0 priced at 15 of
the 25 real files.

The accounting-gate section gains the two rests about what a CONSUMER is
told: the published door contract now names the keys the gate reads, and a
bundle built without the door says why a converted image cannot be proved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1100,16 +1100,42 @@ and fixtures, never code.
   anywhere: a stream whose FIRST two bytes are the EOB escape was carried with
   **32 of 32** pixels never decoded while Pillow refuses the same file. The
   cursor must now also stand at or past the end of the last row. **The line is
-  the CURSOR and not the pixels** -- a delta and an end-of-line escape state
-  their skip, so every decoder agrees on the index-0 pixels they pass over,
-  and a pixel-coverage count would refuse both constructions the format
-  defines. The corpus cannot choose (over the **25** RLE8 BMPs the delivery
-  ships, 25 of 25 paint every pixel, 25 of 25 reach the end, **0 of 25** use a
-  delta) and an independent decoder can: Pillow reads **5 of 8** streams and
-  refuses the same **3**, one short by a single pixel. The earlier `19 of 19`
-  figures above are the BUNDLE's carried assets; 25 is what the delivery
-  ships. Report:
+  the CURSOR and not the pixels** -- a pixel-coverage count would refuse the
+  delta the format defines. The corpus cannot choose (over the **25** RLE8
+  BMPs the delivery ships, 25 of 25 paint every pixel, 25 of 25 reach the end,
+  **0 of 25** use a delta) and an independent decoder can. The earlier
+  `19 of 19` figures above are the BUNDLE's carried assets; 25 is what the
+  delivery ships. Report:
   `docs/2026-09-19-pekerblokken-bindes-til-kjoringen.md`.
+  **AND THAT ROUND'S OWN SENTENCE WAS TRUE OF THE DELTA AND FALSE OF THE
+  END-OF-LINE.** It said both escapes state a skip every decoder agrees on.
+  A delta states a DISTANCE; an end-of-line states only "the rest of THIS
+  row", so an end-of-line at column 0 closes nothing and claims a row the
+  stream never wrote -- four of them and an EOB carried an 8x4 frame with
+  **32 of 32** pixels never decoded, and Pillow refuses those bytes. The class
+  is wider than that construction and this round SWEPT it instead of patching
+  it: over every opcode sequence of length 1-4 on a 4x3 frame, **22 620**
+  streams, this reader carried **703** streams Pillow refuses and drew
+  **1 492** more differently. PM's recommendation alone (refuse a stream that
+  painted nothing) leaves **512** and **1 171** -- it would have narrowed the
+  class a third time. Two clauses ship instead, both `asset_samples_invalid`:
+  an end-of-line at column 0, and a delta whose horizontal offset would leave
+  the row (the format puts it inside the line; this reader keeps the cursor
+  past the row end where a flat decoder rolls it into the next row). After:
+  **0** carried-here-refused-there and **32** drawn differently. **WHAT IS NOT
+  CLOSED IS STATED**: all 32 are a run or absolute block that OVERRUNS its
+  row, which this reader clips at the row end and Pillow spills into the next;
+  refusing those gives 0 and 0 and costs **15 of the 25** real files, so it is
+  a limit and not a loss taken. Cost measured on the corpus FIRST: over
+  **11 441** files scanned across the four raw deliveries and the K2 reference
+  corpus, the only **25** BMPs on this machine use an end-of-line at column 0
+  in **0 of 25** and a delta in **0 of 25**, and 25 of 25 still decode to
+  Pillow's pixels exactly (**3 117 220** compared). R761 rebuilt from a pinned
+  pre-change tree and from this one is `diff -r`-IDENTICAL, 5 551 files, 50 of
+  50 viewable, 19 of 19 lossless. `CURSOR_CASES` goes 8 arms to 12 (one for
+  the cursor rule's ROW clause, PM's `P8`, which survived 51 tests) and the
+  mutant runner 45 to 47. Report:
+  `docs/2026-09-19-eol-stroemmen-som-ikke-maler.md`.
 - **Account for content: `okf build --accounting PATH` and its judge
   `python3 tools/okf_accounting_gate.py` (2026-09-17).**
   - The gate was written RED at `0b00de4` and turned GREEN on all six rows by
@@ -1203,6 +1229,22 @@ and fixtures, never code.
     finding about the run that read as a finding about the build; what it
     would take is an STS reader for the JSON delivery, and `standardContent`
     occurs 0 times in `src/`).
+  - **THE PUBLISHED DOOR CONTRACT NAMES WHAT THE GATE READS (2026-09-19).**
+    The JSON sketch at the top of `okf_accounting_gate.py` is what a consumer
+    implements `--accounting` from, and it did not name `conversions` -- which
+    `asset_holds`' conversion route DEPENDS on -- nor `normalised_soft_hyphen`,
+    `unaccounted` or `double_booked`. A door built from it writes a ledger the
+    gate reads as "nothing was converted", and every converted image comes out
+    claimed-and-not-found: **19 of 50** on R761. Two tests hold the sketch
+    against both sides -- what the gate LOOKS UP (measured with a ledger that
+    records its own lookups, never by grep) and what the door SERIALISES -- so
+    "publish everything" is not a fix either.
+  - **A DOORLESS BUNDLE SAYS WHY (2026-09-19).** Without the flag there is no
+    ledger, so a converted image cannot be proved carried and is counted
+    claimed-and-not-found -- honest, and until now silent: the count was
+    printed and its cause was not. `_tally` names the missing ledger when, and
+    only when, something was claimed and not found. The gate always passes the
+    flag, so **no row moves** (RED 2, 3, 6, exit 1, unchanged).
   - **Operator 2026-09-17:** the door stays OPT-IN until the reference
     corpus's losses are fixed, and of the three proposed exceptions only the
     PDF one (heading, paragraph, table) is APPROVED. It moves no number --