open/llm-ingestion-okf
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 1 Activity

docs(okf-v0.2): the byte-form notice is sent, not owed

Browse source 
The notice po-claude was promised "before GA, not with it" went out
2026-08-02. Two places said otherwise and are now false in a tracked
public doc: the "Owed and unsent" paragraph and GA criterion 9's tail.

The paragraph also records what the message corrected rather than only
what it announced: our 2026-07-31 advice against binding to
OwnershipPolicy.owns stands, but the reason given then (it costs them a
dependency) was not the load-bearing one -- phase 4's Node half is.
A consumer building on the wrong reason builds the right thing by
accident.

Criterion 9 stays as the GA backstop; only its notice half is closed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JxRjDS9U2szUGYDeuZB2M3
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-08-02 21:45:09 +02:00
commit c6a0408f6d
1 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
docs/plan/okf-v0.2-alignment.md
View file

@ -1197,9 +1197,14 @@ against unintended drift. That is an observation of our own emission, not a
promise — a test carrying no stated promise is one we may change together with the promise — a test carrying no stated promise is one we may change together with the
test. A test asserting that the prefix *is* a public interface belongs at GA. test. A test asserting that the prefix *is* a public interface belongs at GA.
**Owed and unsent.** We told po-claude they would hear when the decision fell, **Owed, and sent 2026-08-02.** We told po-claude they would hear when the decision
before GA rather than with it. It has now fallen and the notice has not been sent fell, before GA rather than with it. It fell on 2026-08-02 and the notice went out
(operator's call, 2026-08-02). That is an outstanding obligation, not a closed one. the same day, carrying three things: the decision itself, the Node-half reason that
made it narrow, and the explicit limit that the guarantee is formalised at GA — so
they can plan the ownership test against the prefix without treating it as promised
yet. It also corrects the record on one point rather than only the outcome: our
2026-07-31 advice against binding to `OwnershipPolicy.owns` stands, but the reason
we gave then (it costs them a dependency) was not the load-bearing one.
### GA exit criteria ### GA exit criteria
@ -1224,7 +1229,8 @@ before GA rather than with it. It has now fallen and the notice has not been sen
as a public interface rather than as an observation — and po-claude has been as a public interface rather than as an observation — and po-claude has been
sent the notice owed since 2026-08-02. The notice is due *before* the GA sent the notice owed since 2026-08-02. The notice is due *before* the GA
release, not as part of it: that is what we told them, so a criterion checked release, not as part of it: that is what we told them, so a criterion checked
at GA is the backstop here and not the mechanism. at GA is the backstop here and not the mechanism. **The notice half is done —
sent 2026-08-02;** what remains at GA is the stated guarantee and its test.
**One honest limit on what GA can mean.** A three-repo pilot exercises only what **One honest limit on what GA can mean.** A three-repo pilot exercises only what
those three repos use. `sources` with `usage_window`, multi-verifier `verified`, those three repos use. `sources` with `usage_window`, multi-verifier `verified`,