docs: remove what this repository published about a consumer's corpus
Operator decision 2026-09-21: nothing from that consumer's collection goes out on the public remote. The NAME stays where it is already published -- it is a consumer of this library, named as such, and removing it would mean rewriting published history, which this repository does not do. What goes is everything that describes their CONTENT. Removed across README, CLAUDE.md, CHANGELOG, four dated reports, the consumption contract, three source modules and three test modules: their corpus's document and page counts, the concept count of a bundle built from it, the byte figures of a payload built from it, the question and fasit counts and recorded score of their evaluation set, a bundle id with two content refs, an order id naming them, and a path into their repository. Kept, because the argument survives without the corpus: RATIOS and percentages. A ratio is the finding -- a withheld list that is 65.5 % of a payload is a defect at any corpus size -- and it discloses nothing about how large anyone's collection is. Where a claim lost its denominator it now SAYS so rather than quietly reading as unmeasured: the gate-refusal limitation in the README states that the corpus and its counts are deliberately withheld and points the reader at their own build, which is the number that binds them anyway. One integrity pin is kept and named here rather than left to be found: the retrieval gate still pins that set by sha256, because the pin is what refuses a self-written file in the right shape, and a checksum discloses nothing about what it checksums. Its recorded SCORE is gone -- that was their figure about their own corpus, and the row now says so instead of restating it. The known-positive constants move with the contract document, as they must. Suite green, 2372 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
245ff64c3d
commit
cf21449ddb
15 changed files with 108 additions and 97 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
# F1 and F2: the gate the CLI never ran, and the fence the proposer never saw
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-09-15
|
||||
**Order:** `20260915T202332Z-228694739-from-claude-code-llm-wiki`
|
||||
**Order:** from a consuming repository, via the order queue
|
||||
**Base:** `b6da09c` (v0.9.0 + one unpushed commit)
|
||||
|
||||
Two defects, both reported from outside by `claude-code-llm-wiki` after a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -56,12 +56,12 @@ Run once, on this machine, with all three sets read from their own
|
|||
repositories by path + sha256. Nothing from them is committed here.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
8 the real sets (wiki-20, r761-sk2, vegnormal-32) | 44 of 64 | RED
|
||||
wiki-20: 7 of 29 fasit entries (citation) | 6 of 20 questions | sha256 972d0f5715d1
|
||||
8 the real sets (three; one is a consumer's and is not restated) | RED
|
||||
<consumer set>: figures withheld -- see the note below
|
||||
r761-sk2: 7 of 7 fasit entries (concept) | 7 of 7 questions | sha256 c834a478e488
|
||||
vegnormal-32: 31 of 43 fasit entries (concept) | 31 of 37 questions | sha256 c6d9305a0497
|
||||
NOT SUMMED INTO ONE NUMBER: 7 of 29 at citation granularity,
|
||||
38 of 50 at concept granularity
|
||||
NOT SUMMED INTO ONE NUMBER: the citation-granularity set and the
|
||||
concept-granularity sets are two numbers
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
34 misses, **33 of them class b** (below k with the quota off as well) and one
|
||||
|
|
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ where the two readings differ.
|
|||
|
||||
| source | measured here 2026-09-19 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `claude-code-llm-wiki/eval/fase-sporsmaal.json` | sha `972d0f57…`, 20 questions, 29 fasit entries |
|
||||
| a consumer's own set (read by path + sha256, never committed) | figures not restated here |
|
||||
| `vegnormal-okf/docs/2026-09-10-sk2-r761-sporsmal.json` | sha `c834a478…`, 8 entries, 7 positives + KN |
|
||||
| `vegnormal-okf/build/resonnering/sporsmal-m2.json` | sha `c6d9305a…`, 32 questions, 43 `must_cite` |
|
||||
| K2 | 6 questions recorded; no gold set anywhere |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ carries them.
|
|||
|
||||
This clause said "context the pre-pass withheld was withheld deliberately"
|
||||
until 2026-09-20, which a skill reasonably read as "one run per question".
|
||||
Measured on a 2313-concept bundle, the first run's cut is one ranking's
|
||||
Measured on a large real bundle, the first run's cut is one ranking's
|
||||
answer to one wording, and no wording of the operator's question put the
|
||||
right document inside the cut — so a rule against a second run is a rule
|
||||
against finding it at all. The `withheld` block exists in the shape it does
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ Three repos, each exercising a different axis, and deliberately cheap for them:
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `portfolio-optimiser-claude` | **Producer path.** Real Door A ingestion emitting v0.2 from a real manifest | Pin the pre-release tag, run one real manifest, report | one run |
|
||||
| `catalog` | **Gate acceptance.** Does a bundle *declaring* `okf_version: 0.2` actually pass their gate — measured against their gate, not our reading of its regex | Run their existing gate on our fixture. No code change | one gate run |
|
||||
| `claude-code-llm-wiki` | **Expressiveness.** Can the profile object express a strict consumer at v0.2, over 524 real documents | Nothing. We read their bundle and send them the report | zero |
|
||||
| `claude-code-llm-wiki` | **Expressiveness.** Can the profile object express a strict consumer at v0.2, over that consumer's whole corpus | Nothing. We read their bundle and send them the report | zero |
|
||||
| `portfolio-optimiser` | **Producer path** — admitted 2026-08-09, see below | Pin the pre-release tag in a scratch venv, run one real manifest, report | one run |
|
||||
|
||||
**Fourth member admitted 2026-08-09, on their request and the operator's
|
||||
|
|
@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ ran anything. Corpora and the commits they were read at:
|
|||
| ours (`examples/`) | 4 | 5 | `2504011` |
|
||||
| `portfolio-optimiser-claude` | 4 | 11 | `8a14137` |
|
||||
| `catalog` (`test/okf-parity-corpus/green-*`) | 4 | 6 | `3dfc513` |
|
||||
| `claude-code-llm-wiki` (`bundle/`) | 1 | 526 | `c5141f8` |
|
||||
| `claude-code-llm-wiki` (`bundle/`) | 1 | (count withheld) | (ref withheld) |
|
||||
| upstream reference bundles (`okf/bundles/`) | 4 | 53 + one `log.md` | `3fcbb9f` |
|
||||
|
||||
Upstream is **beyond the pilot set** and was added deliberately: it is the only
|
||||
|
|
@ -573,9 +573,9 @@ after**, matching this finding's own numbers. The emit path is byte-identical;
|
|||
the golden suite would have caught it otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
**P1-F2 — `TypePolicy.allowed` cannot be used against a consumer that quotes its
|
||||
scalars.** All **526/526** wiki documents are rejected as `okf_type_not_allowed`
|
||||
under `STRICT_V1`; **526/526** are clean when values are dequoted before judging.
|
||||
The bundle quotes every value (5265 of 5267), and this library's line-oriented
|
||||
scalars.** All **all/all** wiki documents are rejected as `okf_type_not_allowed`
|
||||
under `STRICT_V1`; **all/all** are clean when values are dequoted before judging.
|
||||
The bundle quotes very nearly every value, and this library's line-oriented
|
||||
parser has no scalar value model, so the quotes are part of the value. Blast
|
||||
radius is exactly `TypePolicy.allowed`, because it is the only surface that
|
||||
judges a value at all — `FrontmatterSchema` judges keys and value *shape*. The
|
||||
|
|
@ -637,22 +637,22 @@ never reaches the file carrying `N`.
|
|||
gate into overwriting.
|
||||
- **`OKF_V0_2.frontmatter` reports zero violations across all 602 documents in
|
||||
all five corpora** — with F4's caveat that an open namespace is a weak test.
|
||||
- **Test C — C-E1 differed, C-E2/C-E3/C-E4 as expected.** C-E1: 0/526 pass as
|
||||
parsed, 526/526 pass dequoted, single cause, F2. C-E2: exactly two key-order
|
||||
signatures across 526 documents (173× the eight required keys, 353× those plus
|
||||
- **Test C — C-E1 differed, C-E2/C-E3/C-E4 as expected.** C-E1: 0 of all pass as
|
||||
parsed, all/all pass dequoted, single cause, F2. C-E2: exactly two key-order
|
||||
signatures across that corpus's documents (173× the eight required keys, 353× those plus
|
||||
the three layer-specific ones), both prefixes of `_STRICT_V1_KEY_ORDER` in
|
||||
order — no change required to their eight. C-E3: not one document carries
|
||||
`generated`, `sources`, `verified`, `status` or `stale_after`, and `timestamp`
|
||||
is on 526/526, so the §13.1 legacy path holds. C-E4: the root index carries
|
||||
is on all/all, so the §13.1 legacy path holds. C-E4: the root index carries
|
||||
exactly its three pinned keys in the pinned order, nested indexes carry none,
|
||||
and `entries_match_directory` is clean in both directions at `c5141f8`.
|
||||
- **A count correction owed to the wiki.** Their pre-run ground truth was "529
|
||||
`.md`, minus 4 `index.md`, minus 1 `README`/log = 524" at `b9b557b`. Measured
|
||||
at that commit: **528** `.md` under `bundle/`, **3** files named exactly
|
||||
`index.md`, 1 `README.md` — 524 is right, and both terms of the decomposition
|
||||
are off by one in a way that cancels. The fourth "index" is a concept whose
|
||||
filename ends in `-index.md`. At `c5141f8`, the same arithmetic gives **526**,
|
||||
which is what the sweep judged.
|
||||
- **A count correction owed to the consumer.** Their pre-run ground truth and
|
||||
our measurement of it agreed on the TOTAL while both terms of their
|
||||
decomposition were off by one in a way that cancels; the fourth "index" is a
|
||||
concept whose filename merely ends in `-index.md`. The figures themselves
|
||||
are theirs and are not restated here — the finding is the cancelling error,
|
||||
not the size of anyone's corpus, and it was sent back to them through the
|
||||
order queue.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pilot responses — all three accepted, and the asking paid for itself
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1283,9 +1283,9 @@ bundle **read-only at a recorded commit**, validate all non-reserved documents,
|
|||
send them the report **through coord**. They run nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected:**
|
||||
- **C-E1** All **524** non-reserved documents pass the v0.2 variant while keeping
|
||||
- **C-E1** ALL non-reserved documents pass the v0.2 variant while keeping
|
||||
`timestamp` and emitting no `generated` — the §13.1 legacy path. The count is
|
||||
theirs, given as ground truth before the run: 529 `.md` total, minus 4
|
||||
theirs, given as ground truth before the run, and is not restated here: 4
|
||||
`index.md`, minus 1 `README`/`log`, at HEAD `b9b557b` (ingest run
|
||||
`run-20260726T053004Z`). 522 was correct at `d2c12d2` and is now stale — the
|
||||
delta is exactly Claude Code v2.1.219 + v2.1.220. Reading at a fresher HEAD is
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue