docs(readme): one file-type table, not two
`### Binary extraction` carried its own six-row Format/Reader/Evidence table over the same rows the pinned table now holds. It was true when written and reachable by exactly the failure this module exists for: three evidence classes copied into prose no test reads. That section now points at the pinned table and keeps its prose about the extra. A fifth assertion in `tests/test_docs_promises.py` holds the duplicate gone. Known-positive: the same query finds 8 table lines in that section on the previous commit, so it can go red. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d3c2707c7
commit
d310dbb34e
3 changed files with 26 additions and 11 deletions
13
README.md
13
README.md
|
|
@ -1057,14 +1057,11 @@ rather than found on `PATH`, with its version asserted against a pin. A host
|
|||
carrying a different converter is refused, not silently used: extraction is
|
||||
deterministic within a converter version and not across one.
|
||||
|
||||
| Format | Reader | Evidence |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| `pdf` | `pdfplumber` | measured |
|
||||
| `docx` | converter | measured |
|
||||
| `xlsx` | converter | measured |
|
||||
| `pptx` | converter | **constructed** |
|
||||
| `odt` | converter | **constructed** |
|
||||
| `rtf` | converter | **constructed** |
|
||||
These six rows have their reader and their evidence class in the one table
|
||||
this README carries: [Supported file types](#supported-file-types), which is
|
||||
pinned to the extraction registry cell by cell. A second table here would be a
|
||||
copy nothing checks, and a copy of an evidence class is exactly the thing that
|
||||
goes false quietly.
|
||||
|
||||
**`constructed` means what it says, and it is a weaker word than `measured`
|
||||
on purpose.** The corpus this work was measured on contains **zero** `pptx`,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue