# Door B concept granularity: one document becomes many concepts Record of what was decided and why, written after the work landed. The repo's pattern: `cf65635` after structure derivation, `d35bcb2` after Door C. ## The defect this closes `process_inbox` emitted exactly one flat concept per dropped file. OKF v0.2 §2 defines a concept as "a single unit of knowledge within a bundle" and a concept ID as "the path of the concept's file within the bundle" — neither ties a concept to a source file, and Appendix A presents v0.1 → v0.2 as a de-monolithization. Door B therefore implemented the shape the SPEC names as the one being migrated away from. No conformance test caught it, and none could. §11 checks that every non-reserved `.md` has parsable frontmatter with a non-empty `type`, so a bundle of one giant concept is fully conformant. **Conformance is the floor, not the proof.** The measurement that found it was a reading of §2's terminology, not a count of keys. ## What was built A new profile, `SEGMENTED_V1`, and a caller-owned, human-adjudicated segmentation plan. `DEFAULT`, `STRICT_V1`, `STRUCTURED_V1` and `OKF_V0_2` are byte-identical; their goldens did not move, which is asserted against the baseline commit rather than assumed. The splitting decision is made once, written down as data, adjudicated by a human, and thereafter replayed deterministically. The run path still makes **zero model calls**, and a from-scratch rebuild is byte-identical to an incremental update. | Piece | Where | |---|---| | Plan model, parser, cache key, slicing | `segmentation.py` | | `SegmentationPolicy` + `SEGMENTED_V1` | `profiles.py` | | Root frontmatter, per-concept mirroring, 1→N, collision gate, ownership, per-directory indexes | `inbox.py` | | Proposer (outside the package) | `tools/okf_propose_segments.py` | | Golden | `examples/ingest-golden-segmented/` | ## The identity decision, and what it costs Order `…2527032751` settled the form: **(c) a root-frontmatter bundle identifier consumers join on**, combined with **(a) `sources[].resource` as an absolute URL wherever the source has a stable one**. (c) carries identity, (a) carries provenance. **No step implemented form (a), and that is the correct outcome.** It is already emitted, at `materialize.py:205,214`, from the manifest locator — Door A's surface. Door B ingests dropped files, which have no stable URL by construction. **S4b is resolved as ONE branch.** The root index is the SOURCE of `bundle_id` — the caller supplies it exactly once, so D5 stays intact — and every concept MIRRORS it. Two bundles built from identical inputs therefore hold concepts whose paths **collide by construction** and whose identity values are disjoint. The collision is the expected behaviour under form (c), not a defect. **Two identity mechanisms, deliberately.** Within a bundle, Door C keys on a content hash; across bundles, identity is this caller-assigned `bundle_id`. A bundle is a collection the caller delimits, so hashing it would hand it a new identity every time a document was added. The cost is stated rather than hidden: a consumer meets both mechanisms. ## Decisions worth their own line - **The capability is `profile.segmentation is not None`, never `IndexPolicy.per_directory`.** `STRICT_V1` already sets `per_directory=True` while Door B ignores it, so keying there would have changed a shipped profile's output and broken its byte-stability pin. - **Offsets index the CANONICAL EXTRACTED TEXT, never source bytes.** A `.csv` is re-rendered before it becomes a concept body, and a `.pdf` has no sliceable prose at all. The golden and the `.csv` fixture both pin this; on a `.md` fixture bytes and text are identical and the assertion would pass for the wrong reason. - **The adjudication cache key is the triple `(source_sha256, extractor_id, extractor_version)`, not the hash alone** (S5b). Source bytes cannot see an extractor swap or a version bump, either of which silently invalidates every stored offset while the hash still matches. Door B observes the hash and the extractor id; the parser *version* is the caller's to declare, for the same reason `bundle_id`'s value is — the library names the key, whoever knows the value owns it. - **All N segments are gated before any is written.** Gating and writing one at a time would leave a half-screened document on disk the moment segment 3 of 5 quarantines. A refusal is reported once, for the document. - **Ownership asks "which concepts are owned by source_file X?"**, recursively, and only under the capability. Keyed on the concept filename, a round naming fewer segments orphaned the rest: they survived incrementally, were absent from a scratch rebuild, and the two diverged silently. - **A retired directory loses its index too.** A scratch rebuild writes an index only where a concept lives, so an orphaned one is a one-sided difference. Found by S7 on 2026-09-01, once its fixture was made to actually retire a segment — with round 2 a superset of round 1, S7 stayed green with retirement disabled entirely. - **Frontmatter values are FLOW form, never block.** `source_offset: [12, 48]`. This library's parser round-trips a flow value as an opaque string and cannot read a block one at all, so emitting block would produce bundles we cannot read back. - **Index ordering has one seam, `_index_sort_key`.** A consumer-controlled ordering is then a parameter, not a refactor. - **The proposer proposes; a human adjudicates.** Every entry it emits carries `PROPOSED` and the rule that produced it. Research measured the reason: the OKF reference agent's four semantic gates need a model this run path does not have, and heading derivation is inert on most of the K2 corpus — 23 of 33 PDFs carry no outline, 95 % of outline entries are CAD metadata, and the scoreable denominator is **one document**. ## Answers to the brief's open questions - *Where does the plan live?* At a caller-supplied path, parsed by the caller and passed in. The library loads nothing from a fixed location — the same division D5 makes for values. - *Is `source_offset` readable?* Not this round. It is write-only until the structured reader (D1b) lands. Nothing built here has to be torn out when it does. - *Does a plan cover a whole run?* No — one plan, selected by content hash. Every other dropped file in the same run keeps today's one-concept rule. ## Known gaps, stated rather than left to be discovered 1. ~~**`derived` marks a declared title as inferred.**~~ **Closed 2026-09-01.** A segmented concept's `title` is DECLARED by the adjudicator, but structure derivation ran over the segment body and added `title` to `derived`. The marker pointed the wrong way in the one direction this repo cares about — a consumer that distrusts derived fields would have distrusted a fact the producer stated. `title` is now dropped from `derived` when a segment is present, and only then. The fix is scoped to `title` alone and pinned that way: an inferred `number` still marks itself on a segment, because nothing about segmentation makes a derived document number declared, and blunting the marker would be the opposite defect. The `SEGMENTED_V1` golden moved with it; the four others were measured byte-identical to baseline. 2. ~~**A plan matching no dropped file is silent.**~~ **Closed 2026-09-01.** A typo'd `source_sha256` segmented nothing and reported nothing, which is the silent skip this library refuses elsewhere. `process_inbox` now refuses fail-fast with `segmentation_plan_unmatched` before any disk mutation. Two sharper questions had to be settled to make the refusal correct rather than merely loud. It asks whether a covering plan was **found**, not whether every file was examined, so an unreadable drop cannot suppress it. And coverage is recorded at **selection**, not after path validation: the first cut asked the later question, and a plan whose hash matched but whose entry paths were then refused looked identical to a plan that matched nothing — the operator would have been sent to check a hash that was already right. An existing collision test caught it; the case now has its own test, verified red against the earlier form. 3. **`status: deprecated` has no producer.** `status` is named as a facet key and nothing writes it, so a deprecated parent cannot carry one. 4. **An unchanged round still rewrites.** `write_bytes` writes unconditionally; the bytes are identical, so no contract is broken, but "an unchanged round writes nothing" is not true today. 5. ~~**Six new error codes live in `tests/test_segmentation.py`, not `tests/test_error_codes.py`.**~~ **Closed 2026-09-01.** The baseline pin forbade editing the registry file while it was the voyage's verification mechanism. The gate run above released it, so the registry convention — one test per code, this file IS the conformance suite — applies again, and the codes were migrated. A conformance suite split across two files stops being one quietly, which is why this was carried as an obligation rather than a preference. ## The end-to-end gate run, and its one failure `/trekexecute` verifies per-step manifests; the plan's `Verification` section holds twelve gates that cross step boundaries and none of them had been run. They were run 2026-09-01 against the tree at `63565bd` with the baseline at `770d8d4`, before any new commit — measuring the tree afterwards would have let the gates score the very work they exist to bound. **Denominator: twelve gates, eleven passed, one failed.** The failure is gate 7, "no existing test weakened": `git diff` against baseline returns one hunk, in `tests/test_profile.py::test_a_profile_is_assembled_from_its_policies`, whose closed field set on `BundleProfile` gained `"segmentation"`. The plan's assumption A4 — that no existing test file would be edited — was falsified during execution and the edit was ratified by the operator. The gate's mechanism is byte-equality against baseline; the property it stands for is that no assertion was loosened, and that property was measured directly rather than inferred: removing `"segmentation"` from the set makes the test fail. The assertion is a closed set with one more legitimate member. The gate stays recorded as failed rather than rewritten to pass, because a gate edited until it is green has stopped answering the question it was written for. Two of the plan's mandatory known-positive controls fired, and both would otherwise have produced a false absence. `git cat-file -e "$SHA:examples/..."` lost its leading `e` to the zsh `:e` history modifier and reported the wrong error for every path; an unquoted `for f in $NEW` did not word-split under zsh and collapsed ten separate checks into one that could only ever fail. Neither was visible in the result — each looked like an answer. The remaining controls confirmed that `git diff` can find a change, `comm` can report a missing test id, the `sed` count pattern can match, `pytest -rs` prints `SKIPPED` against an injected mark, and `grep` returns 2 on a path error and 0 on a planted match. Measured across the suite: 853 tests collected against a baseline of 728, 125 of them in the ten new modules, none skipped, no baseline test id missing, `comm`'s stderr empty, four golden directories byte-identical to baseline, and the run path free of any model or subprocess reference across thirteen source files. ## Relation to the two orders - `…2527032751` (identity) — executed. Form (c) built, form (a) measured as already present at Door A. - `…3790625395` (index ordering) — untouched by design. `_index_sort_key` is the single named seat a consumer-controlled ordering would occupy, so that decision stays a parameter change rather than a refactor.