llm-ingestion-okf/tests/test_tie_shared_rank.py
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 9d1f4b14ed test(fixtures): replace sector-specific example material with generic, fictitious examples — green
Every fixture, test document, tool example and document now uses an invented
kitchen-and-baking handbook series, written in this repository. The package's
behaviour is unchanged; src/ changes are comments and help text only.

- Generated fixtures are regenerated from their generators. Their structural
  counts are identical before and after: elements, images, rows, cells,
  headings, bookmarks and the witness inventory's per-document totals. The
  image-inbox and accounting documents are renamed kapittel-84-*.
- tools/okf_accounting_gate.py: the two options that named one real corpus
  each are replaced by a generic, repeatable --corpus PATH with no default.
  Row 5 compares the PDF pair alone. Gate verdict unchanged: RED rows 2, 3, 6.
- tools/okf_witness.py: the STS JSON reader for one publisher's delivery is
  removed, along with its three twins and five tests. The mutation harness
  loses W09.
- docs/: 13 dated reports that documented runs on a retired reference corpus
  are removed, and 40 are neutralized. Dead links are removed, and no new
  dangling path is introduced.
- The synthetic MCP-gate corpus and the residual probe words are neutral.

Valgt: keep the `okf quality --fasit` bar value (the measured fraction, one corpus) and
rewrite only its provenance, because the verdict stays unchanged and the
number names nothing.

Term check with the local list: 0 of 411 tracked files, 0 file names, 0 of
27 binary fixtures. Suite after git add: 2457 passed, 1 skipped. The base
tree had 2460 passed and 2 skipped; five tests went with the JSON reader and
four were added by the term check. ruff, ruff format and mypy --strict src/
are clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-23 14:52:02 +02:00

198 lines
8.6 KiB
Python

"""The fusion's tie-break, measured rather than assumed.
`concept_scores` fuses three signals by RRF, and RRF consumes RANKS ONLY. A
rank is therefore produced for every concept in every signal -- including a
signal that does not separate them. The tie-break is declared
(`(-score, concept_id)`), so when a signal gives 269 of 270 concepts the same
score, that signal's contribution to the fusion is the concepts' own ids in
lexicographic order: a UUID, which is noise, weighted exactly as heavily as
the two signals that did the measuring.
MEASURED 2026-09-08 on a 270-concept third-party bundle (`feae0c8`), for a
question about `vann- og fuktsikring` in a buried cellar: the document prior
has **two** distinct values over the bundle, and 269 concepts share one of
them. The best covering concept answered **7 of 7** question tokens and led
the body signal at rank 6, and it fused to rank **14** -- outside the cut --
while concepts answering fewer tokens fused ahead of it on nothing but an
earlier id.
This file holds the two halves apart:
- The matcher is CHARACTERISED, not fixed. `normalise` already resolves the
hyphen-and-`og` coordination, so the alternative that would have widened the
tokeniser has nothing to widen. That is asserted here so the choice stays
falsifiable rather than remembered.
- The fusion gets one rule, behind one flag, off by default.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
sys.path.insert(0, str(PROJECT_ROOT / "tools"))
import okf_consume # noqa: E402
QUESTION = "Hvilke krav gjelder vann- og fuktsikring i nedgravd kjeller?"
_FRONTMATTER = (
"---\ntype: reference\ntitle: {title}\nsource_file: {slug}.md\n"
"source_sha256: {digest}\ningested_at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z\n"
"adjudication: proposed\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n"
"verified: [{{ by: process:okf-check, at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z }}]\n---\n\n"
)
def _tie_bundle(root: Path, *, fillers: int = 30) -> Path:
"""One document, so the document prior cannot separate anything.
The gold concept's id sorts LAST and the fillers' ids sort first, which is
what makes the degenerate signal's tie-break work against the concept that
answers the question. The fillers answer `krav`, `gjelder`, `vann` and
`kjeller`; only the gold answers `fuktsikring` and `nedgravd` too.
"""
(root / "krav").mkdir(parents=True)
(root / "index.md").write_text(
"---\nokf_version: 0.2\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n---\n\n- [krav (index)](krav/index.md)\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
entries: list[str] = []
def add(slug: str, title: str, body: str) -> None:
entries.append(f"- [{title}]({slug}.md) — adjudication: proposed\n")
(root / "krav" / f"{slug}.md").write_text(
_FRONTMATTER.format(title=title, slug=slug, digest="1" * 64) + f"## {title}\n\n" + body,
encoding="utf-8",
)
add(
"zz-gull",
"Krav om vann- og fuktsikring i nedgravd kjeller",
"Kravet gjelder vannsikring og fuktsikring i nedgravd kjeller.\n" * 4,
)
for number in range(1, fillers + 1):
add(
f"aa-{number:02d}",
f"Krav om kjeller og vann {number:02d}",
"Kravet gjelder kjeller og vann i anlegget.\n" * 4,
)
(root / "krav" / "index.md").write_text("".join(entries), encoding="utf-8")
return root
def _gold_rank(root: Path, *, tie_shared_rank: bool) -> int:
concepts = [
okf_consume.read_concept(
root / f"{concept_id}.md", bundle_root=root, root_bundle_id="tie-fixture"
)
for concept_id in okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
]
ranked = okf_consume.concept_scores(
concepts,
QUESTION,
okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION),
tie_shared_rank=tie_shared_rank,
)
for position, (concept, _, _) in enumerate(ranked, start=1):
if concept.concept_id.endswith("zz-gull"):
return position
raise AssertionError("the gold concept is not in the ranking at all")
# --- The half that is characterised, not fixed --------------------------------
def test_the_hyphen_and_og_coordination_is_already_resolved_by_the_tokeniser() -> None:
# CHARACTERISATION, green on HEAD. This is the measurement that ruled the
# tokeniser out as the site of the fix: there is no coordination left to
# resolve, so a rule widening it could not have moved the miss.
assert okf_consume.normalise("vann- og fuktsikring") == ("vann", "fuktsikring")
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("fuktsikring", "fuktsikringen")
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("vann", "vannsikring")
def test_a_signal_that_separates_nothing_still_ranks_every_concept(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
# CHARACTERISATION of the defect's mechanism: one distinct score, and one
# rank per concept all the same. The second number is the noise.
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
prior = okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION)
concepts = okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
scores = {prior[concept_id.split("/", 1)[0]] for concept_id in concepts}
assert len(scores) == 1
assert len(concepts) == 31
# --- The half that gets the rule ----------------------------------------------
def test_shared_rank_lifts_the_concept_the_measuring_signals_lead(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
# Two DIFFERENT numbers, not one predicate two branches share: the concept
# answering every question token sits at 8 while the degenerate signal
# orders by id, and at 1 once that signal stops ordering.
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=False) == 8
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=True) == 1
def test_the_payload_is_byte_identical_with_the_flag_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""The rule became the default 2026-09-10; saying so explicitly changes nothing.
The assertion is unchanged in kind -- the implicit and the explicit value
must produce the same bytes -- only the value it names moved.
"""
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
without = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion")
)
explicit_on = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion", tie_shared_rank=True)
)
assert without == explicit_on
def test_the_opt_out_reproduces_the_order_the_default_used_to_give(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""The other half: a consumer needing the pre-2026-09-10 order can have it.
Load-bearing rather than symmetric. `--no-tie-shared-rank` is the only
thing standing between a consumer pinned to the old excerpt order and a
silent reordering, so the opt-out needs a test that goes red if it stops
being a real alternative -- which it would be if it produced the same
bytes as the default on the very fixture built to separate them.
"""
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
default = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion", k=3)
)
opted_out = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(
root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion", k=3, tie_shared_rank=False
)
)
assert default != opted_out
def test_the_flag_changes_the_payload_it_is_meant_to_change(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
off = okf_consume.build_payload(
root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion", k=3, tie_shared_rank=False
)
on = okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, ranking="fusion", k=3)
delivered_off = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in off["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
delivered_on = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in on["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
assert not any(str(cid).endswith("zz-gull") for cid in delivered_off)
assert str(delivered_on[0]).endswith("zz-gull")
def test_the_cli_exposes_the_flag_and_defaults_it_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
parsed = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION])
assert parsed.tie_shared_rank is True
parsed_off = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION, "--no-tie-shared-rank"])
assert parsed_off.tie_shared_rank is False
# The withheld cap did NOT move with it, asserted here so the two are one
# measurement rather than two files' worth of trust: it is a number chosen
# for reasons of BYTES, which nothing this round touched.
assert parsed.withheld_nearest == okf_consume.WITHHELD_NEAREST_DEFAULT
assert parsed.withheld_full is False