Round 6 left two things behind: a measured coverage hole with the repair built
but not the number to move it, and a retrieval regression that kept two
spreadsheet rules off the default. Both are measured; four defaults move.
THE HOLE IS BIGGER THAN THE RULE BUILT FOR IT. Measured over the 39-document
corpus, the pre-move default left 207 435 characters -- 11.92 % -- in no
segment: 163 804 above the first entry, 26 041 between entries, 17 590 after
the last. `--first-span-from-zero` closes the first part entirely, 79 % of the
whole, leaving 43 631 (2.51 %) over 8 of 32 documents. It adds no boundary and
the K2 concept count is identical with and without it (425 = 425); hit@8 holds
[1,1,1,1,1,-] under both tie-breaks and the 12-position reference does not move
one cell.
THE RANKER WAS PUNISHING FINE-GRAINING FOR BEING FINE-GRAINED. Round 6 held
`--sheet-section-rows --keep-table-heading` back because on a bundle built with
them row 1 fell rank 1 -> 2, and ruled out the document prior because its rank
over 39 DOCUMENTS was 1 on both bundles. RRF reads a rank over CONCEPTS:
splitting the gold document 1 -> 12 puts its own twelve concepts in that
signal's whole top tie group, so the one leading the body signal takes position
11, contributing 1/71 where the undivided concept contributed 1/61. A signal
that scored them all EQUALLY still emitted twelve ranks, ordered by concept_id,
and the fusion read alphabetical order as a measurement.
AND THE REPAIR WAS ALREADY IN THE TREE, OFF FOR A COST THAT HAD BEEN REMOVED.
`--tie-shared-rank` shipped off 2026-09-08 because hit@8 fell 5 of 6 to 4 of 6.
Swept over 2 prior exponents x 3 bundles x 6 rows: that fall exists only at
DOCUMENT_PRIOR_EXPONENT 1.0. Round 6 moved the exponent to 0.5 for an unrelated
reason and correctly reported it moved no hit@8 row -- nobody measured the
pair. A flag's "off by measurement" is a measurement of a CONFIGURATION, not a
property of the flag.
Shipped, each with an explicit opt-out and both directions measured rather than
asserted: --no-first-span-from-zero --no-sheet-section-rows
--no-keep-table-heading reproduces the previous bundle byte for byte (diff -rq,
0 differences), and the no-flag build equals the explicit-flag build.
--no-tie-shared-rank reproduces the previous excerpt order -- the one change
here that alters a payload with no bundle changing.
K2 default: 436 concepts / 832 files, digest 8dff8a8e6c15d2f7..., hit@8 5 of 6
ranks [1,1,1,1,1,-]. The pin now holds its own known-negative on those bytes:
read with --no-tie-shared-rank the same bundle gives [2,1,1,1,1,-], so the
green assertion names its cause. Consumer cost is a re-run: 425/810 -> 436/832
on the reference corpus, 15/30 -> 26/52 on a five-document folder.
pptx and md measured end to end for the first time, on two hand-built
documents: md recovers 3 of 4 declared headings, pptx segments per slide only
where the converter recognised a title placeholder. A converter attribute leaks
into titles ({#slide-N}, {#sheet-1}) on 2 of 810 K2 files and 1 of 30 on a
five-document folder -- not fixed, because a filename is reduced from its title
and the fix renames concept ids a consumer has cited.
Suite 1486 (1478 before), ruff and mypy --strict clean over 21 files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
190 lines
8.3 KiB
Python
190 lines
8.3 KiB
Python
"""The fusion's tie-break, measured rather than assumed.
|
|
|
|
`concept_scores` fuses three signals by RRF, and RRF consumes RANKS ONLY. A
|
|
rank is therefore produced for every concept in every signal -- including a
|
|
signal that does not separate them. The tie-break is declared
|
|
(`(-score, concept_id)`), so when a signal gives 269 of 270 concepts the same
|
|
score, that signal's contribution to the fusion is the concepts' own ids in
|
|
lexicographic order: a UUID, which is noise, weighted exactly as heavily as
|
|
the two signals that did the measuring.
|
|
|
|
MEASURED 2026-09-08 on the N500 bundle (270 concepts, `feae0c8`), for the
|
|
question about `vann- og frostsikring` in a subsea tunnel: the document prior
|
|
has **two** distinct values over the bundle, and 269 concepts share one of
|
|
them. The best covering concept answered **7 of 7** question tokens and led
|
|
the body signal at rank 6, and it fused to rank **14** -- outside the cut --
|
|
while concepts answering fewer tokens fused ahead of it on nothing but an
|
|
earlier id.
|
|
|
|
This file holds the two halves apart:
|
|
|
|
- The matcher is CHARACTERISED, not fixed. `normalise` already resolves the
|
|
hyphen-and-`og` coordination, so the alternative that would have widened the
|
|
tokeniser has nothing to widen. That is asserted here so the choice stays
|
|
falsifiable rather than remembered.
|
|
- The fusion gets one rule, behind one flag, off by default.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import sys
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, str(PROJECT_ROOT / "tools"))
|
|
|
|
import okf_consume # noqa: E402
|
|
|
|
QUESTION = "Hvilke krav gjelder vann- og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel?"
|
|
|
|
_FRONTMATTER = (
|
|
"---\ntype: reference\ntitle: {title}\nsource_file: {slug}.md\n"
|
|
"source_sha256: {digest}\ningested_at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z\n"
|
|
"adjudication: proposed\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n"
|
|
"verified: [{{ by: process:okf-check, at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z }}]\n---\n\n"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _tie_bundle(root: Path, *, fillers: int = 30) -> Path:
|
|
"""One document, so the document prior cannot separate anything.
|
|
|
|
The gold concept's id sorts LAST and the fillers' ids sort first, which is
|
|
what makes the degenerate signal's tie-break work against the concept that
|
|
answers the question. The fillers answer `krav`, `gjelder`, `vann` and
|
|
`tunnel`; only the gold answers `frostsikring` and `undersjoeisk` too.
|
|
"""
|
|
(root / "krav").mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
(root / "index.md").write_text(
|
|
"---\nokf_version: 0.2\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n---\n\n- [krav (index)](krav/index.md)\n",
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
entries: list[str] = []
|
|
|
|
def add(slug: str, title: str, body: str) -> None:
|
|
entries.append(f"- [{title}]({slug}.md) — adjudication: proposed\n")
|
|
(root / "krav" / f"{slug}.md").write_text(
|
|
_FRONTMATTER.format(title=title, slug=slug, digest="1" * 64) + f"## {title}\n\n" + body,
|
|
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
add(
|
|
"zz-gull",
|
|
"Krav om vann- og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel",
|
|
"Kravet gjelder vannsikring og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel.\n" * 4,
|
|
)
|
|
for number in range(1, fillers + 1):
|
|
add(
|
|
f"aa-{number:02d}",
|
|
f"Krav om tunnel og vann {number:02d}",
|
|
"Kravet gjelder tunnel og vann i anlegget.\n" * 4,
|
|
)
|
|
(root / "krav" / "index.md").write_text("".join(entries), encoding="utf-8")
|
|
return root
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _gold_rank(root: Path, *, tie_shared_rank: bool) -> int:
|
|
concepts = [
|
|
okf_consume.read_concept(
|
|
root / f"{concept_id}.md", bundle_root=root, root_bundle_id="tie-fixture"
|
|
)
|
|
for concept_id in okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
|
|
]
|
|
ranked = okf_consume.concept_scores(
|
|
concepts,
|
|
QUESTION,
|
|
okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION),
|
|
tie_shared_rank=tie_shared_rank,
|
|
)
|
|
for position, (concept, _, _) in enumerate(ranked, start=1):
|
|
if concept.concept_id.endswith("zz-gull"):
|
|
return position
|
|
raise AssertionError("the gold concept is not in the ranking at all")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- The half that is characterised, not fixed --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_hyphen_and_og_coordination_is_already_resolved_by_the_tokeniser() -> None:
|
|
# CHARACTERISATION, green on HEAD. This is the measurement that ruled the
|
|
# tokeniser out as the site of the fix: there is no coordination left to
|
|
# resolve, so a rule widening it could not have moved the miss.
|
|
assert okf_consume.normalise("vann- og frostsikring") == ("vann", "frostsikring")
|
|
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("frostsikring", "frostsikringen")
|
|
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("vann", "vannsikring")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_signal_that_separates_nothing_still_ranks_every_concept(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
# CHARACTERISATION of the defect's mechanism: one distinct score, and one
|
|
# rank per concept all the same. The second number is the noise.
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
prior = okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION)
|
|
concepts = okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
|
|
scores = {prior[concept_id.split("/", 1)[0]] for concept_id in concepts}
|
|
assert len(scores) == 1
|
|
assert len(concepts) == 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- The half that gets the rule ----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_shared_rank_lifts_the_concept_the_measuring_signals_lead(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
# Two DIFFERENT numbers, not one predicate two branches share: the concept
|
|
# answering every question token sits at 8 while the degenerate signal
|
|
# orders by id, and at 1 once that signal stops ordering.
|
|
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=False) == 8
|
|
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=True) == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_payload_is_byte_identical_with_the_flag_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The rule became the default 2026-09-10; saying so explicitly changes nothing.
|
|
|
|
The assertion is unchanged in kind -- the implicit and the explicit value
|
|
must produce the same bytes -- only the value it names moved.
|
|
"""
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
without = okf_consume.serialise(okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION))
|
|
explicit_on = okf_consume.serialise(
|
|
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, tie_shared_rank=True)
|
|
)
|
|
assert without == explicit_on
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_opt_out_reproduces_the_order_the_default_used_to_give(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""The other half: a consumer needing the pre-2026-09-10 order can have it.
|
|
|
|
Load-bearing rather than symmetric. `--no-tie-shared-rank` is the only
|
|
thing standing between a consumer pinned to the old excerpt order and a
|
|
silent reordering, so the opt-out needs a test that goes red if it stops
|
|
being a real alternative -- which it would be if it produced the same
|
|
bytes as the default on the very fixture built to separate them.
|
|
"""
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
default = okf_consume.serialise(okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3))
|
|
opted_out = okf_consume.serialise(
|
|
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3, tie_shared_rank=False)
|
|
)
|
|
assert default != opted_out
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_flag_changes_the_payload_it_is_meant_to_change(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
off = okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3, tie_shared_rank=False)
|
|
on = okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3)
|
|
delivered_off = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in off["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
|
|
delivered_on = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in on["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
|
|
assert not any(str(cid).endswith("zz-gull") for cid in delivered_off)
|
|
assert str(delivered_on[0]).endswith("zz-gull")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_cli_exposes_the_flag_and_defaults_it_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
|
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
|
|
parsed = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION])
|
|
assert parsed.tie_shared_rank is True
|
|
parsed_off = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION, "--no-tie-shared-rank"])
|
|
assert parsed_off.tie_shared_rank is False
|
|
# `--withheld-titles` did NOT move with it, asserted here so the two are
|
|
# one measurement rather than two files' worth of trust: it is off for a
|
|
# reason of BYTES, which nothing this round touched.
|
|
assert parsed.withheld_titles is False
|