llm-ingestion-okf/tests/test_tie_shared_rank.py
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 36c201cc8a chore(ruff): the acceptance was whatever the default happened to be [skip-docs]
`uv sync --frozen` resolved ruff 0.15.22 and the tree read clean. A loose
install resolves 0.16.6, under which the SAME untouched code reports 148
findings -- 4 more than round 9 counted, because this round added four files.
All of them are new rules rather than new defects: 0.16 widened the default
rule set to whole families (YTT, ASYNC, PL, ISC, C4, UP, B, SIM, FURB, ...).

(`[skip-docs]` is for CLAUDE.md, which a lint-configuration change does not
reach. README's developer section IS updated in this commit.)

THE DEFECT IS NOT THE 148, IT IS THAT NOBODY CHOSE THEM. `[tool.ruff]` set only
`line-length` and `target-version`, so the acceptance was ruff's default, and
the tree stayed green only as long as the lockfile froze an old ruff. `select`
is now written down: `E4`, `E7`, `E9`, `F` (the historical default), `I`
because this tree already keeps imports sorted, and `RUF100` so a `noqa` that
has stopped meaning anything is caught rather than left as decoration. Pin
`ruff>=0.9` -> `ruff>=0.16.6,<0.17`.

Per rule, before -> after: RUF100 50 -> 0, I001 20 -> 0, ISC004 19, PLW1510 8,
C408 8, EXE001 6, RUF007 5, PLE2515 4, UP031 3, B017 3, and fourteen more with
2 or fewer -- the families out of the declared set are 0 by selection, and 148
is the number to start from if they are adopted, which is a separate decision
and not one to take inside a version-pin commit. 57 were auto-fixed; one E402
was reintroduced by the import-sorting fix merging a block away from its
`noqa`, and got the directive back rather than a bare one.

`S` IS MEASURED OUT, NOT ASSUMED OUT: it reports 2657 `S101` on a suite whose
every assertion is an `assert`, and `S603` flags 19 subprocess calls of which
one was ever marked -- selecting it buys 18 suppressions and no defect. Two
`noqa` directives naming non-selected rules were dropped with that reason
recorded in the configuration instead.

THE TWO FILES 0.16 WOULD REFORMAT ARE MARKDOWN, NOT PYTHON: `README.md` and
`docs/2026-09-08-blindsone-below-k-k2.md`. 0.16 formats fenced Python inside
markdown, and both blocks are RECORDS -- the second is a quotation of
`COST_VOCABULARY` as it stood when that measurement was taken. Reformatting a
quotation makes it stop being one, so markdown is excluded from the formatter
and `ruff format --check .` stays in the acceptance over `.py`.

`tools/okf_consume_measure.py` is fenced by the order as run-not-edited, so its
three findings are exempted by path with the reason and the debt named, and its
bytes are untouched.

THE LOCKFILE TRAP IS CLOSED, NOT AVOIDED. `uv.lock` predated the `[ocr]` extra,
so any unlocked resolve wrote that extra's transitive tree back into it -- 681
insertions over 4 deletions, twice now, and round 9 recorded the cause as
`uv run` OUTSIDE the project when it is `uv run` without `--frozen` INSIDE it.
The relock is complete for every declared extra (703 insertions, 26 deletions),
and measured after it, an unfrozen `uv run` leaves the file alone.

`ruff check src tests tools`, `ruff format --check .` (0.16.6), `mypy src` over
21 files and 1535 tests, all green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-09 23:15:17 +02:00

189 lines
8.3 KiB
Python

"""The fusion's tie-break, measured rather than assumed.
`concept_scores` fuses three signals by RRF, and RRF consumes RANKS ONLY. A
rank is therefore produced for every concept in every signal -- including a
signal that does not separate them. The tie-break is declared
(`(-score, concept_id)`), so when a signal gives 269 of 270 concepts the same
score, that signal's contribution to the fusion is the concepts' own ids in
lexicographic order: a UUID, which is noise, weighted exactly as heavily as
the two signals that did the measuring.
MEASURED 2026-09-08 on the N500 bundle (270 concepts, `feae0c8`), for the
question about `vann- og frostsikring` in a subsea tunnel: the document prior
has **two** distinct values over the bundle, and 269 concepts share one of
them. The best covering concept answered **7 of 7** question tokens and led
the body signal at rank 6, and it fused to rank **14** -- outside the cut --
while concepts answering fewer tokens fused ahead of it on nothing but an
earlier id.
This file holds the two halves apart:
- The matcher is CHARACTERISED, not fixed. `normalise` already resolves the
hyphen-and-`og` coordination, so the alternative that would have widened the
tokeniser has nothing to widen. That is asserted here so the choice stays
falsifiable rather than remembered.
- The fusion gets one rule, behind one flag, off by default.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
sys.path.insert(0, str(PROJECT_ROOT / "tools"))
import okf_consume # noqa: E402
QUESTION = "Hvilke krav gjelder vann- og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel?"
_FRONTMATTER = (
"---\ntype: reference\ntitle: {title}\nsource_file: {slug}.md\n"
"source_sha256: {digest}\ningested_at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z\n"
"adjudication: proposed\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n"
"verified: [{{ by: process:okf-check, at: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z }}]\n---\n\n"
)
def _tie_bundle(root: Path, *, fillers: int = 30) -> Path:
"""One document, so the document prior cannot separate anything.
The gold concept's id sorts LAST and the fillers' ids sort first, which is
what makes the degenerate signal's tie-break work against the concept that
answers the question. The fillers answer `krav`, `gjelder`, `vann` and
`tunnel`; only the gold answers `frostsikring` and `undersjoeisk` too.
"""
(root / "krav").mkdir(parents=True)
(root / "index.md").write_text(
"---\nokf_version: 0.2\nbundle_id: tie-fixture\n---\n\n- [krav (index)](krav/index.md)\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
entries: list[str] = []
def add(slug: str, title: str, body: str) -> None:
entries.append(f"- [{title}]({slug}.md) — adjudication: proposed\n")
(root / "krav" / f"{slug}.md").write_text(
_FRONTMATTER.format(title=title, slug=slug, digest="1" * 64) + f"## {title}\n\n" + body,
encoding="utf-8",
)
add(
"zz-gull",
"Krav om vann- og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel",
"Kravet gjelder vannsikring og frostsikring i undersjoeisk tunnel.\n" * 4,
)
for number in range(1, fillers + 1):
add(
f"aa-{number:02d}",
f"Krav om tunnel og vann {number:02d}",
"Kravet gjelder tunnel og vann i anlegget.\n" * 4,
)
(root / "krav" / "index.md").write_text("".join(entries), encoding="utf-8")
return root
def _gold_rank(root: Path, *, tie_shared_rank: bool) -> int:
concepts = [
okf_consume.read_concept(
root / f"{concept_id}.md", bundle_root=root, root_bundle_id="tie-fixture"
)
for concept_id in okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
]
ranked = okf_consume.concept_scores(
concepts,
QUESTION,
okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION),
tie_shared_rank=tie_shared_rank,
)
for position, (concept, _, _) in enumerate(ranked, start=1):
if concept.concept_id.endswith("zz-gull"):
return position
raise AssertionError("the gold concept is not in the ranking at all")
# --- The half that is characterised, not fixed --------------------------------
def test_the_hyphen_and_og_coordination_is_already_resolved_by_the_tokeniser() -> None:
# CHARACTERISATION, green on HEAD. This is the measurement that ruled the
# tokeniser out as the site of the fix: there is no coordination left to
# resolve, so a rule widening it could not have moved the miss.
assert okf_consume.normalise("vann- og frostsikring") == ("vann", "frostsikring")
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("frostsikring", "frostsikringen")
assert okf_consume.tokens_match("vann", "vannsikring")
def test_a_signal_that_separates_nothing_still_ranks_every_concept(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
# CHARACTERISATION of the defect's mechanism: one distinct score, and one
# rank per concept all the same. The second number is the noise.
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
prior = okf_consume.document_scores(root, QUESTION)
concepts = okf_consume.enumerate_concepts(root)
scores = {prior[concept_id.split("/", 1)[0]] for concept_id in concepts}
assert len(scores) == 1
assert len(concepts) == 31
# --- The half that gets the rule ----------------------------------------------
def test_shared_rank_lifts_the_concept_the_measuring_signals_lead(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
# Two DIFFERENT numbers, not one predicate two branches share: the concept
# answering every question token sits at 8 while the degenerate signal
# orders by id, and at 1 once that signal stops ordering.
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=False) == 8
assert _gold_rank(root, tie_shared_rank=True) == 1
def test_the_payload_is_byte_identical_with_the_flag_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""The rule became the default 2026-09-10; saying so explicitly changes nothing.
The assertion is unchanged in kind -- the implicit and the explicit value
must produce the same bytes -- only the value it names moved.
"""
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
without = okf_consume.serialise(okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION))
explicit_on = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, tie_shared_rank=True)
)
assert without == explicit_on
def test_the_opt_out_reproduces_the_order_the_default_used_to_give(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
"""The other half: a consumer needing the pre-2026-09-10 order can have it.
Load-bearing rather than symmetric. `--no-tie-shared-rank` is the only
thing standing between a consumer pinned to the old excerpt order and a
silent reordering, so the opt-out needs a test that goes red if it stops
being a real alternative -- which it would be if it produced the same
bytes as the default on the very fixture built to separate them.
"""
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
default = okf_consume.serialise(okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3))
opted_out = okf_consume.serialise(
okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3, tie_shared_rank=False)
)
assert default != opted_out
def test_the_flag_changes_the_payload_it_is_meant_to_change(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
off = okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3, tie_shared_rank=False)
on = okf_consume.build_payload(root, question=QUESTION, k=3)
delivered_off = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in off["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
delivered_on = [excerpt["concept_id"] for excerpt in on["excerpts"]] # type: ignore[index]
assert not any(str(cid).endswith("zz-gull") for cid in delivered_off)
assert str(delivered_on[0]).endswith("zz-gull")
def test_the_cli_exposes_the_flag_and_defaults_it_on(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
root = _tie_bundle(tmp_path / "bundle")
parsed = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION])
assert parsed.tie_shared_rank is True
parsed_off = okf_consume.parse_args([str(root), "--question", QUESTION, "--no-tie-shared-rank"])
assert parsed_off.tie_shared_rank is False
# `--withheld-titles` did NOT move with it, asserted here so the two are
# one measurement rather than two files' worth of trust: it is off for a
# reason of BYTES, which nothing this round touched.
assert parsed.withheld_titles is False