An independent review of `0b00de4` found the judge was a calculator over a
report the judged writes: `account()` compared BOOKED NUMBERS with the
witness's counts and never opened a concept file. Reproduced here first --
a report that changes not one byte of the bundle and books every element as
carried gave `GATE GREEN`, exit 0, and so did booking every element as
rejected.
The witness now gives every element THE PIECES OF TEXT IT IS MADE OF, and
the gate looks for each of them in the concept bodies the run wrote. Pieces
and not one joined string: a reader writes a heading's marker and a
picture's pointer block between the parts of a container, so a section is
never one contiguous run even when every word of it is there.
Also in the judge, each with a test driving it from both sides:
- a negative booking, a document declared persisted that no concept names,
a document declared rejected that the bundle holds, a rejection code
outside a closed list, and an `accounting_version` the gate does not read
are each REFUSED rather than summed;
- a document the build PERSISTED whose report carries nothing from it is
never clean ("everything rejected" was);
- an asset proves a carry only when its BYTES hash to the source's and it
stands under the name the layout gives it. The check was a name check, so
a zero-byte file called `<sha12>-x.png` read as a carry (m-1).
NOT ONE ELEMENT COUNT MOVED: the 13 fixture documents' counts are identical
before and after, so this commit changes what the gate CHECKS and nothing
about what the witness counts. `texts` is additive in the committed fasit.
The rtf text scanner reads `\uN` escapes and skips `{\fonttbl}`-class
groups, or a fixture's font table reads as the first paragraph of its prose;
xlsx cell text is resolved through `sharedStrings.xml`, where a
spreadsheet's words actually live; a PDF page carries its own text lines,
which no row could see before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
656cbe5d02